Originally Posted by
Doug Garson
It appears the difference in the "True cost to own" between the two vehicles fluctuates each year which I don't understand, I would have expected it to trend towards zero if the more expensive vehicle had lower operating costs.
Note that "true cost to own" includes (or certainly should include) depreciation. The difference will clearly vary as different make/model cars go through out-of-synch upgrade/redesign cycles, and in any case is working from old data.
Yoga class makes me feel like a total stud, mostly because I'm about as flexible as a 2x4.
"Design"? Possibly. "Intelligent"? Sure doesn't look like it from this angle.
We used to be hunter gatherers. Now we're shopper borrowers.
The three most important words in the English language: "Front Towards Enemy".
The world makes a lot more sense when you remember that Butthead was the smart one.
You can never be too rich, too thin, or have too much ammo.