Originally Posted by
Jim Murphy
I read up on this proposed Consumer Product Safety Commission issue a few months ago. The answer is #2. The proposed regulation would not require incorporating SawStop's proprietary technology, but manufacturers would have to incorporate technology which would have a similar ability to prevent a deep cut should flesh contact the blade while operating.
The critical question in play is:
Given the way patents are being (mis)interpreted these days, is it even possible to develop "technology which would have a similar ability to prevent a deep cut should flesh contact the blade while operating" without violating one or more of the SS patents?
Yoga class makes me feel like a total stud, mostly because I'm about as flexible as a 2x4.
"Design"? Possibly. "Intelligent"? Sure doesn't look like it from this angle.
We used to be hunter gatherers. Now we're shopper borrowers.
The three most important words in the English language: "Front Towards Enemy".
The world makes a lot more sense when you remember that Butthead was the smart one.
You can never be too rich, too thin, or have too much ammo.