I've seen threads discussing the pros and cons of straight-sided versus bevel-sided mortise chisels. The big takeaways seem to be
1. Straight sides encourage a straight mortise with less chance of side-to-side wander
2. Chisels with angled sides are easier to extract after a chop and aren't so prone to splintering wood where the sides of the mortise meet the top
There are many examples of each, including those from modern premium makers (beveled: Lie-Nielsen, Veritas, Narex; straight: Blue Spruce, Sorby) and there are defenders of each on the forums. One thought is to combine the best features of each!
Some years ago, I bought my first mortise chisel--it was from Ray Isles. The business end was a sloppy mess, like someone had been on a bender all weekend and couldn't see straight when he (she?) fashioned this chisel on Monday morning. I sent it back and received a replacement that was worse. The indentation from Rockwell hardness testing went all the way through the metal, twisting and distorting the edge. It went back, too.
Exasperated, I bought a vintage Sargent VBM mortise chisel for $22 and was pleased to find out that it held a good edge and performed well.
IMG_1769.jpg
This chisel was made between 1908 and approximately 1918. Interestingly, one edge is straight and the other is angled, as you can see in the following photos.
IMG_1774.jpg IMG_1765.jpg
(The bevel is to the left in each case.) These are original to the chisel, so far as I can tell. I only own two mortise chisels and don't chop enough mortises to tell if design this tracks better than a chisel with two angled sides and is simultaneously easier to extract than one with two straight sides, but I can say that it's an interesting design that works well.
EDIT: changed Ashley Isles to Ray Isles