What I don't get, is why the tool companies would be against it. It's a legitimate excuse to raise the prices of your products. Sure, they'll cost more to make, but the profit margins will increase as the overall costs increase, and you'll get more profit from them. That's exactly why the auto industry no longer makes affordable cars. It's not because they can't. It's because it's more profitable to make more expensive cars. And it's not like they'll cost so much more that it'll have a big impact on sales. I guess it might for the first year or two while customers adjust. But it's not expensive to implement technology. And it's not like table saws are impulse buys for most people. Most people who buy a new table saw do so because they need a new table saw. Not because they were buying 2x4's and saw a table saw at a good price and decided it was too cheap to pass up.
Plus, according to Sawstop, there are 65,000 table saw accidents in the US every year. And the average cost of an amputated finger is over $130,000. Which, I'm guessing, means whatever it costs to implement this new technology into their saws will most likely be offset, and then some, by the reduced number of lawsuits they face. Even if they win every lawsuit brough against the, you're still paying a ton of lawyer's fees to defend yourself against people who probably don't have any assets to recover those fees from after you've won. So it's probably cheaper for them to settle in most instances.
Yeah, I get that no one likes being told what they can and can't do. And by human nature, we tend to have a visceral reaction to that. But perhaps instead of reacting emotionally, the tool companies should slow down and think about this logically over the long term. It benefits them and puts more money into their pockets.
That makes sense to me, improving table saw safety on new machines is a good idea.
In my opinion, much of this is brought about by users who remove existing safety devices, or fail to use safe operating methods.
One negative improvement on modern saws has been the change from the multi function rip fence such as the Delta Unifence, or Euro 4 function fence in favour of the Biessemeyer style fence.
That change increased the hazard of ripping solid wood, and narrow strips
Regards, Rod
I sure don't want to pay extra for it, I just keep my hands out of the blade, just like every other tool in my shop!
I agree and would add to it, "compounded by their naivety that being aware of hazards and their brain will keep them safe".
To paraphrase a comment you posted somewhere, sometime ago, "Just because you've done something unsafe 1000 times without incident doesn't make it safe".
With repect to all the members, I will say;
This topic will be around for a long time as more details emerge. There are many facets of this decision that are not immediately know, not to mention the unintended consequences.
For those that don't like these safety mandate discussions, there are plenty of other great discussion at SMC to participate in. No need to be grumpy in this thread.
I feel a whole lot more like I do now, than I did a little while ago.
EXCUSE ME!!!! I did not offer any opinion concerning the technology, only a link to a news article concerning the POSSIBLE requirement for NEW saws sold. Why all the the discord on a site that is supposed to be congenial?
I practice social distancing with my saw blade