Originally Posted by
Paul Shaffer
........ I am taking this said stock to a lumberyard that has a 30" surfacing planer and separate thickness to get it close to final thickness
I don't know what species you are using, but.............
From my personal book of Lessons Learned: Along with your panels, take an extra representative example - width more important than the actual length, IMO. Have that run thru the surfacing planer......inspect it.....run thru thickness planer......inspect it. Then commit to whatever you decide on the panels.
There is the potential for some breathtaking tearout, depending on the equipment, knife sharpness, care in inspecting the grain direction and proper orientation thru the equipment, and your species..
Originally Posted by
Jim Foster
Drum Sander. I can attest to the fact they do not work without dust collection....
Well said, Jim.
That is true of planers and jointers as well. If you can't pull the waste stream, you can't run the equipment effectively. An extreme example:
One of my company's [well, the company I work for] manufacturing plants has a tremendous business opportunity that requires a moderate speed [150 - 200 LFPM] 5 or 6-head molder. The numbers don't pencil out to justify a 9-head 300 - 400 LFPM molder.
They asked me "how much for a solid used molder and the infeed/outfeed material handling equipment?"
Me: "Wrong question. The correct question is 'How much will it cost to upgrade the dust system to handle the waste stream, so we can even consider the molder? The answer to which is "$50 grand minimum, more likely $75K+.' "
Audible "GULP"
When I started woodworking, I didn't know squat. I have progressed in 30 years - now I do know squat.