Quote Originally Posted by Damien Falgoust
Well, that is a shame.

You know, I've been thinking about this thread and it raises an interesting question, namely: what makes for good moderation?

Are there principles we should use in evaluating the quality of moderation (as we have been asked to do by the OP)? What are those standards?

I've got my own thoughts on that, of course, but I'm going to chew on it a bit before I post them. I'd be interested in hearing what other folks think on the topic, though.
First off you got to have thick skin