Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: Splay Legged Table, Butternut and Ash

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Location
    Cleveland, OH
    Posts
    59

    Splay Legged Table, Butternut and Ash

    I recently finished a splay legged table. It was actually practice for a coffee table I plan on making. And since I am a beginning carver I tried carving the aprons.

    The purpose was to angle the ends of the aprons and get the legs to splay. So that was succesful. I also completed the carvings and used pins and drawbores for the first time.

    But mostly I’m unhappy the top is so big and has so much overhang. It’s basically the same size as the footprint, it’s just the legs are angled so the apron is tucked up underneath.

    I was under the impression I shouldn’t make the top smaller than the footprint, otherwise it might be a tripping or stumbling hazard. Does that sound right or am I making that up?

    This top is chamfered and lacquered so I think it would be too much trouble to alter it. It would be easier to make a new top. But that doesn’t get high on my list of woodworking priorities, so I’ll let it sit for a while and see how I feel in the future.

    blog posts:
    https://jkmwoodworking.net/2024/02/2...-legged-table/
    https://jkmwoodworking.net/2024/03/2...able-2-aprons/
    https://jkmwoodworking.net/2024/03/2...ue-up-and-top/
    https://jkmwoodworking.net/2024/03/2...le-4-finished/

    06 plum.jpg
    02 top view.jpg

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    McKean, PA
    Posts
    15,651
    Blog Entries
    1
    It's an interesting table. It is hard to see from the photos, but it would appear that you could cut down the top a little bit, maybe an inch or so and still leave the top larger than the base.
    Lee Schierer
    USNA '71
    Go Navy!

    My advice, comments and suggestions are free, but it costs money to run the site. If you found something of value here please give a little something back by becoming a contributor! Please Contribute

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    SE PA - Central Bucks County
    Posts
    65,893
    I like the design of your legs and apron for sure...that was a VERY successful project for you. Relative to the top, you have to "throw out" supposed "conventions" like the top shouldn't be smaller than the base because in the end, it's about visual proportion and the splayed base affects that. Suggestion: Remove the top and set it aside. Get some cardboard or inexpensive MDF and made several sample tops of various sizes so you can zero in on the size that looks the best to you. I strongly suspect you're going to be happier with smaller; probably something that's more along the size of the base at about 50-65% of the height rather than at the floor. Keep making test pieces and then change the size of the actual top to match your decision
    --

    The most expensive tool is the one you buy "cheaply" and often...

  4. #4
    Jim's suggestion about cardboard mockups is a good one. Trust your eyes. They will tell you when you have it right.
    Dave Anderson

    Chester, NH

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Lewiston, Idaho
    Posts
    28,549
    It's an interesting design and somewhat intriguing for it's unusual shape. The two woods play well together.
    Ken

    So much to learn, so little time.....

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    SE PA - Central Bucks County
    Posts
    65,893
    I'll add one more thing for you to experiment with on this particular design...the angles that the splayed legs bring to the eye might provide an opportunity to have a variable thickness top once you have the size zeroed in...with a taper on the underside from full thickness at the borders of the base that the top sits on tapering to thinner at the edge. It brings the visual of the base angles onto the top design. You can mock that kind of thing up, too, to see if you like it.
    --

    The most expensive tool is the one you buy "cheaply" and often...

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Location
    Cleveland, OH
    Posts
    59
    Good ideas, thank you.

    As for convention or rule of thumb I agree that making it look better is more important. I guess I'll redo it, just put it in the queue as I process wood for other things. I definitely have 4/4 ash, not sure if I have any thicker.

    In some cases I don't like something and figure nobody will notice or it's not worth messing with. Then in some cases it's "That's gonna upset me every time I look at it".

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    SE PA - Central Bucks County
    Posts
    65,893
    Can't you just resize the existing top once you determine the size that looks the best?
    --

    The most expensive tool is the one you buy "cheaply" and often...

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    2,776
    Declare it a learning experience and move on.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    SE PA - Central Bucks County
    Posts
    65,893
    Quote Originally Posted by Tom Bender View Post
    Declare it a learning experience and move on.
    Why? It's a great table design that the OP just needs to zero in on a proportional top size.
    --

    The most expensive tool is the one you buy "cheaply" and often...

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Location
    Cleveland, OH
    Posts
    59
    I think I'll rework it. It's eating at me more than a gappy dovetail or something lesser.

    As for redoing the top I guess I was hesitant for two reasons. One is the underside is chamfered and would have to be redone, which seemed like a hassle to get right. But no more than starting from scratch I guess. Second is it's lacquered with minwax spray lacquer and I'd have to rework that, too, which I've never done.

    I'll give it a try and update whenever I get a break.

  12. #12
    Here's a vote to leave it as it is. I think it looks great and I wouldn't have thought about the overhang unless you told me. Your grain match on the top, your leg splay and taper, the carving. It's a thoughtful piece that does not scream to me "bad design".

    If it were mine, I'd leave it as is.

  13. #13
    I like it as is. Look in some old books on antiques, nothing odd about it . Modern tables often have smaller tops , and it’s not for looks .

    It’s to keep them cheap. Your table is just right for games, and drinks. Make sure friends know how to use coasters.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •