Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 19

Thread: How much of a gap for a spring joint?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Lubbock, Tx
    Posts
    1,490

    How much of a gap for a spring joint?

    Chasing my tail a little for jointing the boards of my table top. Right now the boards are 102”. How much of a gap is acceptable for a spring joint?
    IMG_0585.jpg
    IMG_0586.jpg

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Connecticut Shoreline
    Posts
    339
    Back before I bought good clamps I used spring joints all the time. I still do. First I would shoot the boards so when offered to one another there are no visible gaps. Then I would run a No. 7 plane along the joint starting a quarter-inch or so from the near end and letting it lift off a quarter of an inch or so from the far end. I'd do this once or twice. So the gap would be roughly 0.003-inches, depending on how thick a shaving I was taking off.

    Note: I should mention that while taking this hollowing cut, I bear lightly at the beginning and end of the cut, then bear more firmly in the center.

    I read an article in fine woodworking where the author suggested 1/32-inch. I never tried it, but that seems like too much to me. If you have to force the boards that far to close it seems like it would introduce a great deal of stress. But since your boards are so long, I imagine a bigger gap would be acceptable. I still wouldn't go 1/32-inch, but you could certainly try it out and see. It's easy enough to shoot it back straighter if need be.

    What was nice about the joint, is that a single clamp in the middle will hold it while the glue sets. These days I shoot the boards flat on my bench sitting on top of, (and overhanging a bit) a nice, flat and parallel pad of wood or plywood, about 1/4-inch thick, using the bench top itself like a long shooting board. It's easy to control the cut this way without worrying about keeping the plane square to the cut. My final pass, once I am taking full width and length shavings all along the edge introduces the spring cut. Then I run match planes on the edges, mostly to help with alignment.

    I think for a long table top, I'd be tempted to glue it up in a couple of sections, not all at once, particularly since I don't have a large assembly bench.

    Good luck with it!

    DC
    Last edited by David Carroll; 05-04-2023 at 3:47 PM. Reason: Added note

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Dayton Ohio
    Posts
    964
    Mostly agree with what David said. You might try this: Put a clamp on it in the middle, without glue. How much effort are you using to close the joint. Depending on the type of clamps and the leverage they impart, you should be able to close with a medium amount of force. But, you also need to consider how dry the boards are. If they are still somewhat wet, I would wait before final planing and glueing.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Lubbock, Tx
    Posts
    1,490
    Quote Originally Posted by Eric Brown View Post
    Mostly agree with what David said. You might try this: Put a clamp on it in the middle, without glue. How much effort are you using to close the joint. Depending on the type of clamps and the leverage they impart, you should be able to close with a medium amount of force. But, you also need to consider how dry the boards are. If they are still somewhat wet, I would wait before final planing and glueing.
    Definitely dry. Put a medium duty F clamp and it closed up with two-ish full turns of the handle at the point of clamping.

  5. #5
    The point is to counteract any tendency for the ends to open up, not to build tension in to the piece.

    If there are five joints with a fat 1/32" gap each, and it is all glued up at once, the table could be 1/4" narrower in the middle than the ends.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Peoria, IL
    Posts
    4,529
    For me it is just seeing a bit of light in the center. Never measured it. I usually check it by putting one board on top of the other and trying to pivot the board on top. If it pivots easily, the center is only touching. If it really drags at first, the ends are touching. Another thing I do is lay out the boards and then mark the mating boards at a joint with inside and outside of the fence. That cancels out any angular error between the table and fence. One board might be 89 degrees and the other 91 degrees, but the joint will be perfectly flat. Use any steep grain boards as a guide for which direction that extreme board should be fed.

  7. #7
    I’ve put as much as an 1/8 “ at center of length on boards 4 and 1/2 feet long. Mainly with soft pines and poplar. Less with harder woods. I have NEVER had
    an end open up . Gap would be less with stuff like maple. I used to put a bounty ,10 ,15 dollars, for anyone who could show me
    an open end. Never had a claim. Used to routinely face, plane ,joint ,and glue, would not use helper. Sprung joints go way back .
    Hot shot new foremen would sometime “ that ain’t necessary “. Real boss always overruled them.

  8. #8
    In recent years there have been a number of online comments such as, “With todays modern glues sprung joints are no longer needed”.
    Most likely posted by guys seeking an office job.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Lubbock, Tx
    Posts
    1,490
    Quote Originally Posted by Richard Coers View Post
    For me it is just seeing a bit of light in the center. Never measured it. I usually check it by putting one board on top of the other and trying to pivot the board on top. If it pivots easily, the center is only touching. If it really drags at first, the ends are touching. Another thing I do is lay out the boards and then mark the mating boards at a joint with inside and outside of the fence. That cancels out any angular error between the table and fence. One board might be 89 degrees and the other 91 degrees, but the joint will be perfectly flat. Use any steep grain boards as a guide for which direction that extreme board should be fed.
    I did match plane plane them after first doing the Charlesworth straightening (where you use stop cuts to get it to stop planing) technique. First time I’ve worked with boards that long.

  10. #10
    Quote Originally Posted by Mel Fulks View Post
    In recent years there have been a number of online comments such as, “With todays modern glues sprung joints are no longer needed”.
    Most likely posted by guys seeking an office job.
    Spring joints were not used in the hand tool era. They arose around 1890 and were originally used on boards that had been jointed by machine. I haven' t used a jointer machine in over forty years and don't understand the mechanics of why they would have spring joints.

    18th century cabinetmaker Peter Nicholson says the edges "must be brought as straight as possible" and talks about using rub joints with "very hot" hide glue, no clamps.

  11. #11
    Sure Warren is right about time periods. The Nicholson news was most assuredly right ,given the choices available in those days. But
    I’m not persuaded that spring joints have any drawbacks. They were using air dried material. I think sprung joints were used in 19 th
    century . Not gonna try to buy a mule to hitch to the buck-board…. unless it’s for a good paying job in a Western movie. And why did
    Doctors stop using leeches? They did good work !

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2019
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Posts
    854
    A skilled joiner would have produced a straight edge with hand tools, and so can a skilled practicioner today. A rub joint is an efficient and simple method to glue two boards together, not even clamps are needed.

    A spring joint works too, but from its description it is a joint that rather relies in a bit of brute force. The Charlesworth method is fiddly and you still need a clamp. I would not describe it as a better or advanced method.

    I can routinely make seamless joints without purposely creating the hollow for a spring, rather aim for a straight edge. The plane I use is a no. 7 that I took special care to flatten the sole. The last passes are end to end shavings, I don't do the stopped planing of the DC method. I do use clamps.

  13. #13
    Nothing wrong with old ways . Rubbed joints are still used ,but mainly on just short stuff. Brute force is only used by young easily
    bored employees. The old workers knew the wood had to be warm . I’ve seen guys bring in wood from a small shed , and glue it up
    quickly! “Boss says he needs it fast ! Sprung joints were used on air dried wood, you don’t want the ends to pop open. And sprung
    joints make sure they won’t. Some architects plans specifically call for sprung joints, or state that glued up stuff with open ends will
    not be accepted. You are not gonna find any holes in the old ways, but you might find faster ways .

  14. #14
    I disagree that sprung joints were all late . They have been found on Cremonese violin tops.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Perth, Australia
    Posts
    9,497
    I do not use spring joints on the whole, only very occasionally. A straight edge and rubbed joint is my preference. I think that the reason for some using a spring joint is when the edge is difficult to get straight, and a slight hollow is better than a high spot, and more likely to close flat.

    Regards from Perth

    Derek

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •