Originally Posted by
Frank Pratt
Can you provide a reference for that? I'm not arguing, just curious from a Canadian point of view. The CEC & NEC are increasingly harmonized with each code edition & at present are not that far apart. The CEC requires AFCI protection only for receptacle circuits, not for lighting or hardwired equipment. The whole reason for implementing AFCIs is because of the fire hazard due to defective cords & extension cords. Fires started by arcing in the building wiring is extremely rare. Any point of connection in the building wiring must be in an approved enclosure so that if there's a connection failure the resulting arcing will be contained. But cords exist 'in the wild' and are run under carpets, pinched behind furniture legs, subject to foot traffic and worse. That's where the protection is needed.
The arcing is also the basis for horsepower rating for disconnects on motors, has little to do with the size of the wiring. Motors are just generators backwards and can continue to produce a charge as it spins down.
The disconnect must be able to contain a possible arc: snap switch, arc shield, pin and sleeve... something.
Comments made here are my own and, according to my children, do not reflect the opinions of any other person... anywhere, anytime.