Although I spent significant time looking at how people recommend flattening Arkansas stones, I have never done it myself because none of my Arkansas stones are out of flat and the ones that I did buy that were out of flat turned out to be misrepresented and were not Arkansas stones and not worth flattening.
It was my intent to to use loose carbide on a glass plate to do it (with water), but I have seen (in videos) people do it on concrete. If mine were out of flat, I would start with one to see how it went and go for it. One concern is that you are indeed introducing scratches and then the question becomes, how fine should you go after flattening the stone. I know that for a while, it was recommended that you purchase a nice Washita stone and then lap the two different sides at different grits so that they would cut differently. So, understand that if you do lap these stones, you may end up changing the cutting characteristics. I have zero experience with this, it is just something that I expect to happen. This was mentioned in passing in a previous post.
"Best Arkansas Stones" (A brand / company) looked at scratch patterns to find equivalent "micron" sizes for their stones (this is or was on their web site, no idea if it is still there), but, they claimed
- soft = 12 micron = 1200 grit
- Hard = 10-11 Micron = 1500 Grit
- Black = 7 - 7.5 micron = 2300-2500 Grit
- Translucent = 5.5-6 micron = 3500-4000 grit.
I should use the "approximate" symbol rather than the "equals" symbol, but it is not on my keyboard and the non-scientists or mathematicians in the group probably prefer to see =.
I do own a sets from Preyda, Dan's, and Best. Nobody agrees on "equivalent" grit. Preyda claims:
- Soft = 400 - 600 grit
- Hard = 600 - 800 grit
- Hard Black = 2000 - 3000 grit
- Translucent = 4000 - 6000 grit
- Surgical Black = 8000 - 1000 grit
Then Dan's steps in and says (listed in order of what they think will leave the finest edge):
Soft = 400 - 600 grit
Hard = 600 - 800 grit
True Hard = 1200+ grit
Translucent = 1200+ grit
Black = 1200+ grit
Preyda and Dan's both agree that their finest stone is not the translucent. I own only a few translucent stones.
I have had good luck with all of these stones but the general consensus seems to be that Dan's is the fastest cutting (or maybe the best) but I am in no position to agree or disagree with that since I feel that I have too little experience to say this. I have, however, managed to get good results from all of these stones. Initially I had poor luck with my Best stones so I bought some Dan's stones and received advice here on how to use them and then I started seeing good results from all of them. Oh, I have also had pretty good luck with a stone that I accidentally purchased that the seller called a Washita but does not look like any washita I know. It seems to cut similar to what I expect from a Washita. I realized immediately I had purchased the wrong stone but it is one of my favorites; go figure!.