Originally Posted by
Eric Rathhaus
I don't really think using the PSA lapping films and a flat surface is more expensive in the long run. I think very few workers who switch to stones buy just a few. Most end up with a collection of stones that cancels out any of the claimed savings.
Originally Posted by
Warren Mickley
Many questionable posts in this thread, this is but one example.
"Switch to stones"? I have been sharpening seriously since 1962. I never tried sandpaper, not entirely sure what lapping films are. However, my cost is about $0.0008 per tool sharpened. And I sharpen carving tools, turning tools, molding planes, knives, razors, and more. How do your costs compare?
In my case more has been spent on stones than abrasive sheets. My case would be one to make Eric's case. My basic set of water stones set me back less than $200. This was many years ago. Since then a set of slip stones has been added along with a few other grits of stones purchased used. To add to this well beyond a full set of oilstones has also been added to my sharpening equipment. My finest water stone is a Norton 8000 (3µ). My desire for a finer stone has been abated over the years.
The big problem with 'Scary Sharp' is more about the inconvenience of finding fine grit sandpaper. Most retail outlets do not carry abrasive sheets beyond a 600 grit. The retailers catering to those who do automotive painting usually only carry up to a 2000 grit. My tools will need sharpening on a regular basis and running around town to purchase sandpaper isn't my idea of woodworking. If finer papers or films are needed, my project might have to wait for them to arrive from an online order.
Now, in my shop, abrasive sheets are only used when something rough has to be cleaned up. They aren't even used on wood much with the exception of on the lathe.
jtk
"A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty."
- Sir Winston Churchill (1874-1965)