Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 22 of 22

Thread: Random Orbital Sander vs Palm Sander

  1. #16
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Wayland, MA
    Posts
    3,667
    I still have my longe beloved PC330, which was the go-to palm sander for decades. I never use it any more, I only keep it for sentimental reasons. My Deros and Festool sanders sand rings around it.

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    22,512
    Blog Entries
    1
    I have a Makita and a Bosch 1/4 sheet sander. The Makita I use with a syntho pad when cleaning cast iron surfaces. The Bosch probably has less than an hours use on it; had it well over 10 years.
    "A hen is only an egg's way of making another egg".


    – Samuel Butler

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Apr 2018
    Location
    Cambridge Vermont
    Posts
    2,289
    There's a number of tools that still exist simply because some people feel that there's always an option of a power tool to save time in doing something by hand. I suspect that those buying them are not woodworkers but carpenters.

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Okotoks AB
    Posts
    3,499
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by Alex Zeller View Post
    There's a number of tools that still exist simply because some people feel that there's always an option of a power tool to save time in doing something by hand. I suspect that those buying them are not woodworkers but carpenters.
    Or mostly home handy persons. The don't have the knowledge set to choose tools that will be truly useful & those that won't.

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Issaquah, Washington
    Posts
    1,320
    I us a Festool DTS 400 EQ for inside corners and edges. that's what is was designed for and it does a really good job. My only complaint is that it will not accept the square base, that sucks.

  6. #21
    I will try a different way to make the point I tried to make earlier. It isn't the shape of the pad that determines whether a sander is useful, it is the action of the pad. Linear motion leads to very slow progress and is to me a useless sander. I'd rather sand by hand. A square pad sander with orbital or random orbit motion is useful. Orbital will leave scratches, however. But they can be removed with a little hand sanding. A round pad random orbit sander is not better or worse than a square pad random orbit sander. The square pad can be an advantage in the corners.

  7. #22
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Okotoks AB
    Posts
    3,499
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by Jim Dwight View Post
    I will try a different way to make the point I tried to make earlier. It isn't the shape of the pad that determines whether a sander is useful, it is the action of the pad. Linear motion leads to very slow progress and is to me a useless sander. I'd rather sand by hand.
    Precisely this.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •