Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: UK vs USA methods of joining rectangular sheet metal ducts

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Las Cruces, NM
    Posts
    2,040

    UK vs USA methods of joining rectangular sheet metal ducts

    Methods of joining rectangular sheet metal ducts used in the UK, as shown on http://www.ductstore.co.uk/acatalog/...r_ducting.html seem simpler than the method using drive cleats still common in the USA. (e.g. at 1:09 in https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JIBIyf0JdPM ). What keeps the drive-cleat method in business?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2019
    Location
    The old pueblo in el norte.
    Posts
    1,899
    Quote Originally Posted by Stephen Tashiro View Post
    Methods of joining rectangular sheet metal ducts used in the UK, as shown on http://www.ductstore.co.uk/acatalog/...r_ducting.html seem simpler than the method using drive cleats still common in the USA. (e.g. at 1:09 in https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JIBIyf0JdPM ). What keeps the drive-cleat method in business?
    I'm going to venture to guess... habit. The method of connecting electrical wiring differs greatly between the US and Europe as well (you don't see wire nuts often in Europe, mostly Wagos) There are pluses and minuses to both, but it tends to resort to that which the installers and inspectors are more used to.
    ~mike

    happy in my mud hut

  3. #3
    What keeps the drive cleats in business, the cost of labor. Any idiot can assemble duct using "Pittsburgs" and drive cleats, plus you don't have sealant in the joints in case of future remakes, or add ons.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Fort Smith, Arkansas
    Posts
    1,988
    I generally credit difference between how the two countries do things like this to the long history of English craft guilds and long apprenticeships. Opposed to the more American “time is money” attitude. Not saying either is better or correct. When I was doing neon as a hobby i was amazed to find out some differences in how the how the glass is formed into the final shape. The English method being much more difficult and time consuming to learn as well execute. It made for impressive substantial signage. End result otherwise made little difference in practical results. Reminds me of the “good enough vs overkill” thread
    Last edited by Michael Weber; 06-18-2020 at 10:51 AM.
    My three favorite things are the Oxford comma, irony and missed opportunities

    The problem with humanity is: we have paleolithic emotions; medieval institutions; and God-like technology. Edward O. Wilson

  5. #5
    Google "ductmate". Industry has been using that and TDF connections for 40? Years. Before that, it was government lock. Talk about time consuming!

    On small duct we still use slip and drive because it's faster and it takes up less room. TDF measures 1 7/8" each side, it wouldn't fit in a wall cavity or joist bay.

    Note: according to SMACNA standards ALL transverse seems must be sealed. Longitudinal seems get sealed after 3" w.c., I think (we seal all longs). I would rather pry apart TDF than beat off a drive that is caulked .

    Stan

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •