[OP]
Contributor
In trying to view some posts from 2013 the page is requesting me to log in. When viewing more current pages I am already logged in.
The archived page will not accept my log in information.
The page giving me a problem is > https://www.sawmillcreek.org/showthread.php?211786
Not sure if other archived pages are having a problem.
It may be others are having a similar problem. My first attempt was to send a PM to Keith and found his mailbox is full.
Thanks for any help,
jtk
"A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty."
- Sir Winston Churchill (1874-1965)
[OP]
Contributor
This problem seems to have been fixed during a read of the pages.
It is kind of a strange experience to see that happen as it happens.
jtk
"A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty."
- Sir Winston Churchill (1874-1965)
It did the same thing for me, but I could see all the photos and posts even though I wasn't supposedly signed in. The other thing I noted was that when I first went to the linked post it showed there were several pages of posts. However, as I scrolled down the page it changed the view automatically to my preferred viewing format and the pages went away.
Last edited by Lee Schierer; 04-17-2020 at 2:03 PM.
Lee Schierer
USNA '71
Go Navy!
My advice, comments and suggestions are free, but it costs money to run the site. If you found something of value here please give a little something back by becoming a contributor! Please Contribute
Contributor
Jim the link to the archived spokeshave thread was "on" www.sawmillcreek.org. The main page and current pages are all "on" sawmillcreek.org. (Usually a server is configured so these are synonyms, but I guess it doesn't have to be that way.)
Anyway, following the www. link, I wasn't logged in. Deleting the "www." and reloading got me to the page with my login and formatting preferences.
Administrator
David is correct. I'm not sure what happened, possibly a software bug.
The first picture in the post looks like it a dead link.
If anyone finds other instances where the page link is incorrect please let me know.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote