Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 31 to 45 of 45

Thread: Schooling on dados

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Poughkeepsie, NY
    Posts
    207
    Quote Originally Posted by Stewie Simpson View Post
    The following measurements were taken from a dedicated 3/8" (9.52mm) wooden dado plane.

    9.01MM (sole width.)

    9.32MM (cutting iron width.)

    9.60MM (spur width)
    In case anyone is wondering, 0.3MM is approximately 1/85 of an inch.

  2. #32
    I made two dados this morning using a combination plane. Both dados had the same iron, but had different spacing of nickers and skates. One dado was .504 wide, the other was .569 wide. Here are the measurements:
    .
    Blade .476
    Skates .472
    Nickers .504

    Blade .476
    Skates .537
    Nickers .569

    If the nickers are not wider than the skates, the skates will rub the sidewalls and become tight. If the nickers are not wider than the iron, the edge of the iron will rub the side walls als a problem.

    Those who suggest that the iron ought to line up with the nickers or that the nickers ought to line up with the skates, probably don't have much experience.

  3. I believe the biggest issue the OP faced relates to the sliding section position, which causes the skate to bottom out preventing the cutter from reaching the "meat" and the shifting the blade guide knob screw away from the blade, leaving it unstable laterally.

    Wide blades (over 3/16") have to be supported by both skates. If the sliding section is too far from the plane body, its skate will not support the blade and the blade guide knob screw will not support the blade laterally.

    Hopefully this picture clarifies beyond what prose can achieve. I'm not addressing the spur positioning, which is secondary to the skate and sliding section positioning (it's still important, but if you don't place the sliding section in the right place, the spurs don't even come into play).

    Click to enlarge.

    Combo plane.jpg
    Last edited by Philippe Grant; 03-08-2019 at 11:36 AM.

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    2,534
    Quote Originally Posted by Philippe Grant View Post
    I believe the biggest issue the OP faced relates to the sliding section position, which causes the skate to bottom out preventing the cutter from reaching the "meat" and the shifting the blade guide knob screw away from the blade, leaving it unstable laterally.

    Wide blades (over 3/16") have to be supported by both skates. If the sliding section is too far from the plane body, its skate will not support the blade and the blade guide knob screw will not support the blade laterally.

    Hopefully this picture clarifies beyond what prose can achieve. I'm not addressing the spur positioning, which is secondary to the skate and sliding section positioning(it's still important, but if you don't place the sliding section in the right place, the spurs don't even come into play).
    Phillippe; then explain to me why you chose to designate the position of the sliding skate (shown in example 2) as being Acceptable.


  5. #35
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Longview WA
    Posts
    27,453
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by Stewie Simpson View Post
    Phillippe; then explain to me why you chose to designate the position of the sliding skate (shown in example 2) as being Acceptable.

    Not Philippe, but that looks like a set up for with grain plowing and not for cutting a dado.

    jtk
    "A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty."
    - Sir Winston Churchill (1874-1965)

  6. Quote Originally Posted by Stewie Simpson View Post
    Phillippe; then explain to me why you chose to designate the position of the sliding skate (shown in example 2) as being Acceptable.

    I made the diagram to illustrate the correct skate alignment and then contrast the effect of shifting the sliding section closer or further from the plane body.
    So why is it "acceptable"? Well, it's not the best sliding section alignment, but you should be able to do a nice cut if you make the right adjustments to your spurs (i.e. if the gap marked by the left pointing arrow is not too wide). Also your blade is supported laterally, and the skate doesn't bottom out into the wood you actually want to cut.

    what do you think?

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Longview WA
    Posts
    27,453
    Blog Entries
    1
    what do you think?
    My thought is that is okay for plowing grooves with the grain and even needed when cutting a rabbet/rebate narrower than the blade being used. Doing this when cutting a dado is likely to leave one edge ragged.

    jtk
    "A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty."
    - Sir Winston Churchill (1874-1965)

  8. #38
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    2,534
    A question for users of the Veritas Combination Plane. Is there an adjustment that allows the user to set the cutting edge outside the line of the fixed skate for rebate work.
    Last edited by Stewie Simpson; 03-09-2019 at 7:42 PM.

  9. #39
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Perth, Australia
    Posts
    9,494
    Quote Originally Posted by Stewie Simpson View Post
    A question for users of the Veritas Combination Plane. Is there an adjustment that allows the user to set the cutting edge outside the line of the fixed skate for rebate work.
    Yes - each nicker has a set screw that opens the nicker out from the skate. Further, only one skate is "fixed". The other slides on the fence rods.

    However, one does not use a nicker for rebates. Instead, the plane blade is extended a smidgeon outside the wall of the plane body. This allows it to cut into the corner of the rebate. On the Veritas plough planes, both the Small and the Combo, one does this by angling the blade (very slightly).

    Regards from Perth

    Derek
    Last edited by Derek Cohen; 03-09-2019 at 10:36 PM.

  10. #40
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    2,534
    The reason I asked, is its not considered common practice to engage the nicker when working long grain rebates.

  11. #41
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Perth, Australia
    Posts
    9,494
    I took a few photos yesterday to show a few set up details, along with their results, in keeping with the original questions at the start of this thread. Setting up the Veritas Combo Plane for a dado takes me about 1 minute, perhaps less. I will show this.

    The other factor is that of positioning the nickers. I consider this to be at the heart of setting up a dado plane, be it of the combination plane style, where there are individual nickers, and placed at either side of the plane body. A combination plane extends the width of the body using two skates. There is a second type of nicker system, which is a single nicker divided into two cutting sides. This is the version used by many vintage woodies and, more recently, HNT Gordon. From my review ...





    Close up of the nicker …




    With the Veritas, there is a nicker on the outside of each skate ...




    This is adjustable, using a set screw, which pushes the nicker/blade away from the body.

    My preference (which runs against the recommendation of Veritas) is to remove the set screws (because they fall out and get lost otherwise) and set the nicker for minimal (more on this in a moment) projection from the skates. As mentioned before, I rounded the tips of the nickers (they came pointed). There were two reasons for this. Firstly, the original tips of my pre-production plane were fragile and broke off. I hardened them. Secondly, the rounded edge seems to me to slice more easily than a pointy tip, and the plane cane be drawn back of the work piece as well as pushed through it. In other words, it is less directional.

    The depth of cut is not really a number. Numbers are starting points. Say 1/16". We really want the nicker to be set a smidgeon more than the depth of cut, as it needs to slice the cross grain ahead of the blade. Too deep and the nickers will just make the plane harder to push.



    Now warren made an important point at the start of this thread when he wrote that, because the nickers must lie outside the side of the blade, they cannot leave a dado the width of the blade. I agree with this, and it becomes the main topic here.

    If using power tool methods, it is possible to prepare boards (to fit) and the dados in an interchangeable order, since they can be made to the same width. For example, a 1/2" power router bit creates a 1/2" dado, and one can thickness 1/2" thick boards quite separately. On the other hand, if using hand tools, it is relevant to create the dado first and the board thickness second - based on the width of the dado.

    The question is "how close to 1/2" can we create a dado?". In other words, assuming a 1/2" wide dado blade (straight or skewed), what is the minimal amount of dado projection we can get away with before the side walls begin to spelch?

    So I set up a simple examination (this took far less time than the write up!). Veritas and HNT Gordon planes and a small piece of Radiata Pine scrap ...



    The Veritas blade is exactly 1/2" (as one might expect) ..



    Now I have stated before that I set up the nickers flush with the sides of the skate (and then adjust the skates outside the blade). This is not quite accurate. Indeed I set them up this way ...





    Why I say that this is not quite accurate is that my nickers have been used with the set screw, and this has deformed them very, very slightly. So now, when I try and set them flat against the side of the skate, they do not sit flush, and project very, very slightly. I cannot measure the amount of projection, only feel it with a finger tip. This has a bearing on the set up and the results. More in a short while.

    Here is a tool needed for planing dados - a straight edge. Traditionally, one would simply nail a wooden fence to the work piece. The nail holes would be either filled or ignored. The Veritas requires the fence to be a 1/4" high. So I have a straight edge with non-slip and a square reference at one edge ...



    If the work piece is held firmly, it becomes a simple matter to clamp down the straight edge ...



    I then pull the plane back against the fence, but very lightly. All I want is a positioning of the outside nicker ...



    Nickers are not always the cleanest cutters - not sharp enough - for leaving a pristine side wall. And so I prefer to knife them in ...



    Now go ahead and plane the dado, beginning at the far end. The depth stop will keep it level (note that I have not relieved the end of the dado here, as I generally would to prevent spelching. This example is about the nicker, not the finish at the end of the dado. I am not even using the depth stop).




  12. #42
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Perth, Australia
    Posts
    9,494
    How wide is this?





    That is 0.55mm/0.02" wider than the blade. mmmm .... not that great a result as far as I am concerned. I am sure it is possible to do better.

    The HNT Gordon dado plane is my reference here. It is set up in a similar way, but stock standard. The blade was previously measured also as exactly 1/2" (12.71mm on this occasion). It has a skewed blade, but that only affect the cleanness of cut (the skewed blade leaves a cleaner finish). The nickers protrude from the body of the plane, but again I can only feel this with fingertips as it is not obvious.

    A clean slate ...



    Planed ...



    Measured ...





    That is a better result than the Veritas. So, let's try the Veritas again, with the skates set up a tad closer together ...




    That is a tighter fit for a 1/2" thick board, and visually it looks good in that there is no spelching. As I look at the photo now, I can see compression on the right sidewall. It is not present on the left sidewall. Is that from knifing the line, or from the nicker?

    In conclusion, as one moves the nicker closer to the blade, the leeway for error is lowered. One question is "Is it worth it?". I guess the answer is that one needs to recognise that hand tool work is best done in a specific order. Power tool thinking needs to be set aside here. It is evident that one can get pretty damn close to the width of the blade - the amounts exceeded here are unlikely to be registered visually - and that the amount of leeway can be pretty damn small.


    Regards from Perth

    Derek

  13. Quote Originally Posted by Stewie Simpson View Post
    A question for users of the Veritas Combination Plane. Is there an adjustment that allows the user to set the cutting edge outside the line of the fixed skate for rebate work.
    Nope, that is not possible.

  14. Quote Originally Posted by Jim Koepke View Post
    My thought is that is okay for plowing grooves with the grain and even needed when cutting a rabbet/rebate narrower than the blade being used. Doing this when cutting a dado is likely to leave one edge ragged.

    jtk
    I'm with you Jim.

  15. #45
    Quote Originally Posted by Philippe Grant View Post
    Nope, that is not possible.
    Philippe, you may have misunderstood what Stewie meant. For grooves or rabbets the blade cuts the sidewall of the rabbet and needs to protrude a small amount for clearance, so the skate does not rub the side wall. I don't think he was thinking it would be outside the line by very much.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •