Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Mini Max FS 35 knife guard

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    folsom, california
    Posts
    104

    Mini Max FS 35 knife guard

    i recently helped a friend buy a used fs 35 ($800.) now today, he calls me and tells me a piece of wood fell on the plastic guard and broke it. are parts for this machine still available, or has someone else had this problem and made their own? do they have pictures?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    SE PA - Central Bucks County
    Posts
    65,680
    Parts are available at https://www.scmgroup.com/en_CA/scmwood/spare-parts

    He might also want to consider replacing the "pork chop" with a Euro "bridge guard". I did that after blowing up two of the plastic "pork-chops" and much prefer the bridge guard. The are not inexpensive, are easy to use and don't swing out in front of the machine like the "pork chops" do.
    --

    The most expensive tool is the one you buy "cheaply" and often...

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    folsom, california
    Posts
    104
    jim,

    thank you for the link, and for the guidance.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Toronto Ontario
    Posts
    11,247
    I agree with Jim on the bridge guard, I really like using it.

    If you have a business, the bridge guard is not allowed under OSHA regulations in the US.......Regards, Rod

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Alberta
    Posts
    2,162
    Rod ,I wonder what the heck they are thinking ? I made my own bridge guard for a 16" jointer that I bought this summer. In the short time I have used it I would say that I never want to see a pork chop guard again. Cutterhead covered and clearly visible with a clear definition of exactly where it is, versus a guard that leaves a nasty chunk of cutterhead exposed at the end as a board goes through when face jointing.I am sure they have there reasons ,yet I wonder what they are ?

  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by Mike Kees View Post
    Rod ,I wonder what the heck they are thinking ? I made my own bridge guard for a 16" jointer that I bought this summer. In the short time I have used it I would say that I never want to see a pork chop guard again. Cutterhead covered and clearly visible with a clear definition of exactly where it is, versus a guard that leaves a nasty chunk of cutterhead exposed at the end as a board goes through when face jointing.I am sure they have there reasons ,yet I wonder what they are ?
    I have a pork chop on a FS41, and had one on a RIDGID 6" jointer. The 6" jointer's guard was much more sturdy made of metal, and didn't come out too far. On the 16" the guard can come out quite a bit; and just kind of flops all over. I wonder if really, different widths of machines should have different types of guards. On an even wider jointer, I can only see the pork chop getting even more unwieldily.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Alberta
    Posts
    2,162
    I think you are right Charles. I had a 8'' Delta before I bought the machine I have now and the guard on it worked fine. When I was trying to make a guard for my new one I mocked up the shape with scrap plywood pieces and a "pivot" that I welded up and clamped on my machine to experiment. It took about three shapes and one hour to figure out this was not working. The bridge guard is so basic and works very well on wider machines. I adjusted to using it in about a day as well.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    WNY
    Posts
    9,647
    I had an Inca with a bridge guard on it for over 25 years. Now I have an FS-35 with a pork chop guard, which I prefer by far. When edge jointing with the Euro guard the blade is always exposed by at least the thickness of the board you are jointing. When face jointing the Euro guard must always be lifted up by at least the thickness of the board and when working with 8/4 stock that's a lot. It requires you to reposition your hands from behind the guard as you begin face jointing to the other side of the guard as you push the board over the tables. The pork chop guard completely covers the blade before the board is jointed, whether edge or face jointing. It exposes the blade as the rear of the board clears the cutterhead, to be sure, but if your hands are on the board, or on push blocks, it seems perfectly safe to me. Further, you can move your hands, or not, as you choose, not as the guard demands. My two cents.

    John
    Last edited by John TenEyck; 02-05-2019 at 8:58 AM.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Toronto Ontario
    Posts
    11,247
    Quote Originally Posted by Mike Kees View Post
    Rod ,I wonder what the heck they are thinking ? I made my own bridge guard for a 16" jointer that I bought this summer. In the short time I have used it I would say that I never want to see a pork chop guard again. Cutterhead covered and clearly visible with a clear definition of exactly where it is, versus a guard that leaves a nasty chunk of cutterhead exposed at the end as a board goes through when face jointing.I am sure they have there reasons ,yet I wonder what they are ?
    Hi Mike, OSHA doesn’t mandate a pork chop, they mandate that it be spring closed (or I presume closed automatically like a Suva guard).

    My post was not correct, and no, I can’t understand why they don’t allow a manual bridge guard.......Regards, Rod.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •