Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 31 to 42 of 42

Thread: Maka stv vs oliver 91d?

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Williamstown,ma
    Posts
    996
    If you are going to be running old US or UK chisel and bit sets, the collets will work, as the bores are standardized to the drill diameters. If you are going to use some of the current Japanese tooling, you will find a drill chuck setup invaluable. The newer stuuf is less standardized, and drill diameters are off. Also, newer drills are generally too short to run properly in the collets.

    Interestingly, the Oliver is patterned after, or used the castings/design of the Greenlee manual machines for the most part.

  2. #32
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Northern Virginia
    Posts
    1,370
    Blog Entries
    3
    Quote Originally Posted by Joe Calhoon View Post
    Jared,
    i think a chuck would be an advantage. Also, the premium Japanese chisel sets have odd auger sizes that don’t fit the standard bushings. If you can make your own or have access to a machine shop that also solves the problem. I believe a chuck would be faster for tooling changes though.
    Fortunately I owned a milling machine and lathe long before I owned a circular saw. That fact has worked out well when I've accidentally bought slightly broken machines.

    The collets/bushings would be very easy to make, though if the Japanese stuff varies that much a chuck would be the way to go.

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Woodstock, VA
    Posts
    1,006
    How hard is the chuck conversion on a 91?

  4. #34
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Northern Virginia
    Posts
    1,370
    Blog Entries
    3
    Quote Originally Posted by Jeff Bartley View Post
    How hard is the chuck conversion on a 91?
    From just a quick observation it Looks like the rotor has to come out to be cut down and a internal taper cut.

  5. #35
    Quote Originally Posted by Jeff Bartley View Post
    How hard is the chuck conversion on a 91?
    I will try to take some pictures of how the one I have is done. It's all apart currently

  6. #36
    Quote Originally Posted by Jared Sankovich View Post
    From just a quick observation it Looks like the rotor has to come out to be cut down and a internal taper cut.
    You add a spacer between motor and chisel cone.

  7. #37
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Northern Virginia
    Posts
    1,370
    Blog Entries
    3
    Quote Originally Posted by Darcy Warner View Post
    You add a spacer between motor and chisel cone.
    That would be easier

  8. #38
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Northern Virginia
    Posts
    1,370
    Blog Entries
    3
    Wiped it down, it looks better than I expected.
    20190204_212256.jpg

  9. #39
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Woodstock, VA
    Posts
    1,006
    Looks good Jared. I have a 91 also but mine is 440 only, haven't decided what to do about that yet. Hopefully I'll get to it later this month.

  10. #40
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Ouray Colorado
    Posts
    1,400
    Here is a picture of a Oliver with a chuck. I looked at this one at the Forest Products lab in Madison. Not the best picture of the chuck.
    Oliver mortiser.jpg
    Oliver mortiser 1.jpg

  11. #41
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Northern Virginia
    Posts
    1,370
    Blog Entries
    3
    Quote Originally Posted by Joe Calhoon View Post
    Here is a picture of a Oliver with a chuck. I looked at this one at the Forest Products lab in Madison. Not the best picture of the chuck.
    Oliver mortiser.jpg
    Oliver mortiser 1.jpg
    I believe most of the small oliver mortisers had chucks

    194d
    Ralph_Rye_194-2.jpg

  12. #42
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Ouray Colorado
    Posts
    1,400
    My bad, I forgot about the 194..

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •