Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Adjusting overscan on Ruida?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Location
    Helena, MT
    Posts
    186

    Adjusting overscan on Ruida?

    Is it possible to adjust the amount of overscan on a ruida 644x controller? I've got two different lasers running ruida controllers, and one of them has a ton more overscan at similar speeds than the other, which leads to taking almost double the time to do a similar engraving project. Would like to see if I can tweak the overscan down a bit hopefully, just not sure where to look for the settings, or if it's even available.

    Thanks!
    Epilog Fusion Pro 48 - 120 Watt
    OMG Laser 60W JPT MOPA Fiber
    Mimaki UJF-6042MkII e UV Printer

  2. #2
    Exactly what do you mean by 'overscan' ?
    I can guess, but I might by wrong.
    Is it scan interval in config, or X & Y offset in user parameters, or misalignment between scans and vector cust, or what, precisely?
    I have our ruidas tuned pretty finely. but it took some work.
    Best wishes,
    Ian



    ULS M-300, 55w made 2002 with rotary. Goldenlaser 130 watt, 1300x700 made 2011.
    Flat bed 2500x1300 150/90watt 2 tube laser, 2018 model.
    Esab router, 1989, 4.5 x 2.0 m, conv. to Tekcel, and modded a 2nd time.
    HP L260-60". Roland PNC-1410. Mimaki GC-130 SU.
    Screenprinting carousel 6x4 and 7x4 ft 1-arm bandit vac table.
    Corel Draw X3, Illy, Indesign & Photoshop CS2 & CS5, Enroute 4
    Pencil, paper, paintbrush, airbrush & dagger-liners & assorted other stuff.

  3. #3
    I believe he's talking about the distance the laser travels beyond the extreme edges of what's engraving, not sure what controller is in my Triumph but at 800mm/second the 'overscan' (over-run?) was almost 4" on each end! --contrast that to my Gravograph machines, even running at 80" per second the over-run is less than 1/16" inch...

    Awhile back I changed a few of my speed settings in the 'parameters' sections, those settings no one seems to know what they mean? Like Min-Acc, Cut-Acc, Cut-Acc-Acc, etc... Anyway, lowering some numbers made for nicer curve cuts, and I believe what I changed also affected the amount of over-run, but (a) I couldn't tell you what I changed exactly, and (b) I'm not REALLY sure it DID help!

    I know what CAN help, depending on what you're engraving; in particular, the length of the engraving you're doing... example, if you're running 1" x 4" plates by column, running at 500mm/s may seem faster than 250mm/s, but at 250 the over-run is MUCH less than at 500, so 250 will likely engrave faster. Just be sure to adjust power...

    If you're running long lengths in one sweep with little 'white space', then run as fast as practical...
    ========================================
    ELEVEN - rotary cutter tool machines
    FOUR - CO2 lasers
    THREE- make that FOUR now - fiber lasers
    ONE - vinyl cutter
    CASmate, Corel, Gravostyle


  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Location
    Helena, MT
    Posts
    186
    Quote Originally Posted by Kev Williams View Post
    I believe he's talking about the distance the laser travels beyond the extreme edges of what's engraving, not sure what controller is in my Triumph but at 800mm/second the 'overscan' (over-run?) was almost 4" on each end! --contrast that to my Gravograph machines, even running at 80" per second the over-run is less than 1/16" inch...

    Awhile back I changed a few of my speed settings in the 'parameters' sections, those settings no one seems to know what they mean? Like Min-Acc, Cut-Acc, Cut-Acc-Acc, etc... Anyway, lowering some numbers made for nicer curve cuts, and I believe what I changed also affected the amount of over-run, but (a) I couldn't tell you what I changed exactly, and (b) I'm not REALLY sure it DID help!

    I know what CAN help, depending on what you're engraving; in particular, the length of the engraving you're doing... example, if you're running 1" x 4" plates by column, running at 500mm/s may seem faster than 250mm/s, but at 250 the over-run is MUCH less than at 500, so 250 will likely engrave faster. Just be sure to adjust power...

    If you're running long lengths in one sweep with little 'white space', then run as fast as practical...
    Kev is 100% correct, I'm talking about the distance the head travels past the edges of the engraving. Our CamFive machine at 500mm/s will travel about 1/2" past but our Boss laser will travel about 3" Makes a huge difference in engraving time. Have only had Lightburn on our Boss, so going to fire up the factory RDWorks and dig around in settings today and see what I can figure out to try and tighten it up a bit.
    Epilog Fusion Pro 48 - 120 Watt
    OMG Laser 60W JPT MOPA Fiber
    Mimaki UJF-6042MkII e UV Printer

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Location
    Helena, MT
    Posts
    186
    Quote Originally Posted by Steve Utick View Post
    Kev is 100% correct, I'm talking about the distance the head travels past the edges of the engraving. Our CamFive machine at 500mm/s will travel about 1/2" past but our Boss laser will travel about 3" Makes a huge difference in engraving time. Have only had Lightburn on our Boss, so going to fire up the factory RDWorks and dig around in settings today and see what I can figure out to try and tighten it up a bit.

    OK, wanted to follow up on this. Sat down with both lasers and started comparing things yesterday. Not the easiest thing, as one uses SmartCarve as it's native software and the other RDWorks. But, I did find an answer. Messed around with some parameters in the password protected settings section, and didn't seem to make any difference. Then, I started playing with the acceleration numbers in the User settings tab in RDWorks. Turns out that the Acceleration on our CamFive machine is set to 10,000mm/s2, which appears to be the max acceleration that is allowed by what's programmed in the controller from the factory. The acceleration on the Boss was set to 2,000mm/s2. Cranked it up to 10,000 which is also the max acceleration allowed, and it now has much less overscan and the time to engrave is almost identical to the other laser.
    Epilog Fusion Pro 48 - 120 Watt
    OMG Laser 60W JPT MOPA Fiber
    Mimaki UJF-6042MkII e UV Printer

  6. #6
    Well, THAT'S cool, that you figured out what some of those sets of numbers mean!

    I haven't played with those high-accel numbers myself, going to have to experiment!

    --do yourself a favor and verify the engraving quality- that you need at least- isn't affected by the reduced startup/slowdown times you changed. The stepper's SHOULD handle the extra shock, but if they try to move or stop the lens head too quickly, the weight of the head could cause the stepper to skip...
    ========================================
    ELEVEN - rotary cutter tool machines
    FOUR - CO2 lasers
    THREE- make that FOUR now - fiber lasers
    ONE - vinyl cutter
    CASmate, Corel, Gravostyle


  7. #7
    Sorry, I've not been back to check up on this, but now I understand what you meant, I could have answered your question: the higher the possible acceleration, the shorter the turn-around space needed. But there can be compromises, depending on other variables in your system, like overshoot when cutting.

    I did a big analysis and posted it in the facebook Lightburn group about 4 or 5 months ago, as I was tuning out big laser into compliance - on our case, with high accelerations came appalling wobble and lack of accuracy in fine text or fine shapes when vector cut.
    I also did some engraving, (as in 8 ft x 4 ft approx) and worked out, from memory, depending on the power, speeds above 350 mm/s were ineffective in reaching the end of the job more quickly, or in getting greater detail. Lesser speeds took longer and gave no better detail. Higher speeds lost detail, and did not really improve on total time by more than a few percent. For our 2 chinese machines that is.

    Eg one scanning job took 32 minutes to complete at 350 mm/s, but took 30.5 minutes at 400 mm/s. Not much time gain for a 12% speed increase - because it relates to acceleration - and I needed accuracy more than speed there.

    A lot of the oddly named user parameters and vendor settings, I figured out also, and had to tweak them one at a time to achieve the accuracy I needed.
    It was a LONG learning curve, and much step retracing...
    Best wishes,
    Ian



    ULS M-300, 55w made 2002 with rotary. Goldenlaser 130 watt, 1300x700 made 2011.
    Flat bed 2500x1300 150/90watt 2 tube laser, 2018 model.
    Esab router, 1989, 4.5 x 2.0 m, conv. to Tekcel, and modded a 2nd time.
    HP L260-60". Roland PNC-1410. Mimaki GC-130 SU.
    Screenprinting carousel 6x4 and 7x4 ft 1-arm bandit vac table.
    Corel Draw X3, Illy, Indesign & Photoshop CS2 & CS5, Enroute 4
    Pencil, paper, paintbrush, airbrush & dagger-liners & assorted other stuff.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Location
    Helena, MT
    Posts
    186
    Quote Originally Posted by Kev Williams View Post
    Well, THAT'S cool, that you figured out what some of those sets of numbers mean!

    I haven't played with those high-accel numbers myself, going to have to experiment!

    --do yourself a favor and verify the engraving quality- that you need at least- isn't affected by the reduced startup/slowdown times you changed. The stepper's SHOULD handle the extra shock, but if they try to move or stop the lens head too quickly, the weight of the head could cause the stepper to skip...
    That was all part of my testing process as well, doing some test engravings to ensure that I wasn't messing with engraving quality, etc. Overall, I'm happy with the changes, has cut the engraving time down to acceptable times, and everything looks on par with what it was before.
    Epilog Fusion Pro 48 - 120 Watt
    OMG Laser 60W JPT MOPA Fiber
    Mimaki UJF-6042MkII e UV Printer

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Location
    Helena, MT
    Posts
    186
    Quote Originally Posted by Ian Stewart-Koster View Post
    Sorry, I've not been back to check up on this, but now I understand what you meant, I could have answered your question: the higher the possible acceleration, the shorter the turn-around space needed. But there can be compromises, depending on other variables in your system, like overshoot when cutting.

    I did a big analysis and posted it in the facebook Lightburn group about 4 or 5 months ago, as I was tuning out big laser into compliance - on our case, with high accelerations came appalling wobble and lack of accuracy in fine text or fine shapes when vector cut.
    I also did some engraving, (as in 8 ft x 4 ft approx) and worked out, from memory, depending on the power, speeds above 350 mm/s were ineffective in reaching the end of the job more quickly, or in getting greater detail. Lesser speeds took longer and gave no better detail. Higher speeds lost detail, and did not really improve on total time by more than a few percent. For our 2 chinese machines that is.

    Eg one scanning job took 32 minutes to complete at 350 mm/s, but took 30.5 minutes at 400 mm/s. Not much time gain for a 12% speed increase - because it relates to acceleration - and I needed accuracy more than speed there.

    A lot of the oddly named user parameters and vendor settings, I figured out also, and had to tweak them one at a time to achieve the accuracy I needed.
    It was a LONG learning curve, and much step retracing...

    At least in the Ruida controllers, there are separate acceleration numbers for Scanning and cutting. I was only changing the numbers in the scanning section, so I don't think it should make any difference in cut precision in my case, or at least I haven't seen any differences yet. Thanks for the input though. Would like to see your analysis you did if you would be able to send private or something, as I don't facebook.
    Epilog Fusion Pro 48 - 120 Watt
    OMG Laser 60W JPT MOPA Fiber
    Mimaki UJF-6042MkII e UV Printer

  10. #10
    Steve, I'd need to start afresh, as it grew into a thread of about 35 or 45 posts, with photos and explanations...
    but maybe I can redo it, and make it more concise, and post it here - good idea.
    (but it won't be this week!)
    Best wishes,
    Ian



    ULS M-300, 55w made 2002 with rotary. Goldenlaser 130 watt, 1300x700 made 2011.
    Flat bed 2500x1300 150/90watt 2 tube laser, 2018 model.
    Esab router, 1989, 4.5 x 2.0 m, conv. to Tekcel, and modded a 2nd time.
    HP L260-60". Roland PNC-1410. Mimaki GC-130 SU.
    Screenprinting carousel 6x4 and 7x4 ft 1-arm bandit vac table.
    Corel Draw X3, Illy, Indesign & Photoshop CS2 & CS5, Enroute 4
    Pencil, paper, paintbrush, airbrush & dagger-liners & assorted other stuff.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Location
    Helena, MT
    Posts
    186
    Quote Originally Posted by Ian Stewart-Koster View Post
    Steve, I'd need to start afresh, as it grew into a thread of about 35 or 45 posts, with photos and explanations...
    but maybe I can redo it, and make it more concise, and post it here - good idea.
    (but it won't be this week!)
    Completely understand. Thanks.
    Epilog Fusion Pro 48 - 120 Watt
    OMG Laser 60W JPT MOPA Fiber
    Mimaki UJF-6042MkII e UV Printer

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •