Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 26 of 26

Thread: Comparing shop vac and dust extractor performance (data included)

  1. #16
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Okotoks AB
    Posts
    3,499
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by Larry Frank View Post
    The difference is that with a HEPA filter you only have that and says nothing else about air and dust leaks. My Festool HEPA vac is well sealed everywhere on it with modest escaping. With my Ridgid vac with HEPA filter, the lid leaks and is not tight.
    With the Ridgid vac, at least, the only place for particulates to get past the filter is right where the filter fits onto its seat. Pretty easy to make sure there are no leaks there. If the lid is leaking, it's only allowing air to bypass the suction hose, not the filter.

  2. #17
    Interesting thread. I have two Rigid shop vacs, one for in the shop equipped with a dust deputy and auto-start switch and another for use outside the shop. But my favorite shop vac right now is a cordless Ryobi. It is not as powerful but does a really nice job cleaning the car. I also use it with a floor sweep to clean the floors in the house. Works better, or at least as well, as my house vacuum. And not having to plug and un-plug is great.

    Each of my three serves a purpose. I'm sure Festool shop vacs are nicer but I'd rather spend the money on other tools.

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Northern VA
    Posts
    100
    I have 3 shopvac "professional" vacs (model 5872510) with HEPA filters that are very small and rated at 200 CFM (with a normal filter). I also have a CT36. The shopvacs cost just over $125 each and are very portable. The CT36 costs $800 and is not so portable. For the cost of one CT36, I can obviously buy several shopvacs...even dedicating some to specific tools (e.g., the Kapex). I measured the CFM's with the vacs connected to my Kapex and there was little difference. If I had it to do over again, I wouldn't buy the CT36. The shopvacs are not only cheaper, but more useful to me due to their portability.

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Toronto Ontario
    Posts
    11,274
    Quote Originally Posted by Dan Friedrichs View Post
    100% agree, Rod. I'm actually thinking of getting a new CT-26 because it's quieter and you can add that neat bluetooth on/off button at the end of the hose
    I wish we lived closer, I'm trying to sell my CT26 which is in like new condition.

    I really want a Midi which is what I had at first, however it was recalled by Festool and they gave me a CT 26 with handle and a box of 5 bags.

    Regards, Rod.

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    NW Indiana
    Posts
    3,085
    I would like to understand how people measured the cfm of their shop vac. Measuring cfm with such a small hose is difficult to get accurate information.

  6. #21
    Quote Originally Posted by Rod Sheridan View Post
    I wish we lived closer, I'm trying to sell my CT26 which is in like new condition.

    I really want a Midi which is what I had at first, however it was recalled by Festool and they gave me a CT 26 with handle and a box of 5 bags.

    Regards, Rod.
    Well, at least you got a good deal in that exchange!

    I actually bought a CT-26 last week and put my Mini on craigslist.

    The new hose design is REALLY nice.

  7. #22
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Deep South
    Posts
    3,970
    The variation in velocity from the center to the edge of the cross section of a duct is not negligible. CFM calculations based on center measurements only will be considerably higher than reality. I'm not sure what you can do about it with such a small cross sectional area to measure. Relative comparisons should still be useful if not exactly accurate.

  8. #23
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    North Dana, Masachusetts
    Posts
    489
    It's interesting to see some numbers on shop vac performance.

    I turned my Rigid shop vac into a central vac by parking it outside, and running solid plastic central vac pipe into the shop. 2 1/2" hose goes right on the end of the pipe. Reading this post, I guess I have been turning my "Rigid-central vac" into a "dust extractor" by putting a small hose on it for a sander. I did put a 55 gallon drum cyclone right before the shop vac, so only the finest dust ever makes it into the shop vac.

    If I ever had to use that screamer indoors, I would be looking at a decibel chart, as well as a cfm chart. I don't have neighbors.

  9. #24
    I have a craftsman shop vac and a CT26; but pretty much never use the shop vac anymore. I don't know if the CT26 moves as much air; but it is quieter, has a more convenient footprint, and the integrated auto on feature is nicer than the separate plug-in one I was using before for the miter saw. I found that the D27 hose it came with would get jammed on any serious cleanup task, but after I bought a D36 hose and cleaning set I've not had any complaints. I did buy a CT MIDI afterwards to get something that is easier to go up and down stairs (and I wanted a second one so that I could have one in the shop and another in the garage where I'll break down plywood or other place that I'm working).

  10. #25
    Thanks for doing the research on this- always interesting to see real-world data. I'm wondering- did you create the apparatus and essentially leave it alone while switching hoses or did you have to adjust the apparatus each test? I don't know much about fluid flow but it seems that a slight change in position in such a small tube could yield significantly different results? That is a question, btw. and not a statement! You guys know WAY more than I do.

  11. #26
    Randy, when I did my tests, at least, I put the hot wire anemometer in a hole in a 5' section of PVC pipe, then just swapped vacs. So hopefully any test-to-test variation due to experimental set up was minimized.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •