Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 18 of 18

Thread: Warning to Minimax CU300 owners, and possibly other sliders with scoring blades

  1. #16
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    SE PA - Central Bucks County
    Posts
    65,842
    I didn't realize that the OEM scoring blade is trapezoidal...I've never used it as I somehow also ended up with a fixed width scoring blade that's .125" and matches my Forrest blades exactly. I only raise the scoring blade just enough to...um, score...the material.
    --

    The most expensive tool is the one you buy "cheaply" and often...

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Central WI
    Posts
    5,666
    A conical scorer is a good choice if there are stops on the adjustment lever so the blade can be lowered and then returned to the correct height easily. If the height is adjusted with a wrench in the cast iron top and has no stop, the split scorer is the best choice. I mark the lateral adjustment so I don't use it in error but then the scorer can be any height and work. If the ply isn't tight to the table, the scorer needs more height and still might go fuzzy. I use Mac's clamps and that means the scorer doesn't need to protrude much. Dave

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Houston, Texas area
    Posts
    1,308
    Quote Originally Posted by Jim Becker View Post
    I didn't realize that the OEM scoring blade is trapezoidal...I've never used it as I somehow also ended up with a fixed width scoring blade that's .125" and matches my Forrest blades exactly. I only raise the scoring blade just enough to...um, score...the material.
    i measured my scoring blade with calipers. It is trapezoidal. Like David said, the best height is also a function of the flatness of the stock.
    Mark McFarlane

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •