Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 19

Thread: Talk to me about saws

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    51

    Talk to me about saws

    So this week's project was a rack to hold various spools of wire taking up space all over my garage. It was pretty simple, 4 boards to form an open box, slots cut into the sides to receive dowels which hold the spools, and a french cleat across the back. Inspired by James Pallas' hand tool speed thread, I kept an eye on the clock to see how long this project took. It took 7 hours and 15 minutes total, which I thought was pretty good, especially considering: A) much of the design was done on the fly, by physically placing the spools on the boards and marking from there, and B) I'm not in a hurry when woodworking, I do it for relaxation.

    In my post-game analysis, I identified two areas that I felt were unnecessarily slow; planing end-grain, and making rip cuts.

    About my saws: When I started this hobby, I knew that I couldn't cut in a straight line if my life depended on it, so I wasn't about to run out and waste money on nice saws. Instead I bought a Stanley Sharp Tooth 20 inch saw for dimensioning, and a little Marples Japanese-style saw for joinery. One day something clicked and I could suddenly saw straight and square. I felt finally that the Marples saw was holding me back, not my ability, and treated myself to a Veritas dovetail saw. My joinery improved immensely with the Veritas saw.

    On to the Stanley... It is a crosscut pattern, and I can crosscut through an 8-inch wide 4/4 Poplar board in about 30 seconds. Again, I'm in no hurry, so for another point of reference, the saw moves through about 1/2 (or a bit more) of material with each push stroke. However, when ripping, I'm lucky to get 1/4 inch per stroke. I estimate I spent an hour or more making the 5 rip cuts that this project required; If I could rip at the same rate that I crosscut, that time would have been reduced to 15 minutes or less. I've decided its time for a dedicated rip saw.

    Sorry for the ramble, now for the questions!

    Can I expect the same sort of performance from a similarly toothed rip saw? In other words, the Stanley is 8 tpi, will an 8 tpi rip saw move through 1/2 or so per stroke? Or is ripping just a slower method of sawing, and I need a coarser toothed saw to move at the same speed?

    Rather than buy another new saw, I have several old warranted superior saws given to me by my father-in-law. All are in need of a good clean-up and sharpening. My plan is to learn how to sharpen using these saws (I'll have to learn eventually anyway,) and give myself a rip saw in the process. I've read several threads about saw sharpening, and watched a few Youtube videos... but I'm still a bit confused about rake angles, fleam, etc... Are there any idiot-proof tutorials out there? Or, dare I ask, any good advice for a novice sharpener?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Location
    Forest Lake MN
    Posts
    340
    Its not bad to have rip saws in a few different tooth sizes, my rougher one is 5.5 and cuts faster than my x-cut saw x-cut. Smaller tooth are slower but cut cleaner.

    Filing a saw rip is pretty easy, close to zero rake and zero fleam. X-cut is much harder to do. An x-cut can be made rip in a few file strokes.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Longview WA
    Posts
    27,461
    Blog Entries
    1
    A crosscut saw is usually pretty poor at ripping. Crosscut teeth are filed to cut across the wood fibers. When they cut in the same direction as the fibers they sort of just slide along with them.

    Rip filed teeth are like little chisels severing the wood fibers and ripping them away. A rip saw can cut well when used to cross cut. It usually leaves a bit rougher surface depending on the tooth count and the set.

    One of the members here also has a fine site with information on saw sharpening:

    www.vintagesaws.com

    On the left side of the screen is a menu of saws. Click on the Library for the good stuff. Currently there is a server error, that should be back up soon.

    Here is another site with such information:

    http://norsewoodsmith.com/?q=content...ning-hand-saws

    With several saws to choose from you have an opportunity to try different filings. Especially if a few of the saws have the same tooth count. Try different rake angles to see which works better for you.

    jtk
    "A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty."
    - Sir Winston Churchill (1874-1965)

  4. #4
    Do it. There are several videos online that will teach you how. Wood by Wright has a good one, but there are several. I sharpened a rip cut saw on my first try. It cuts like a scalded cat. I know I probably got a few of the teeth "wrong" technically, but it cuts straight, true and like butter. Mine is 8ppi, and leaves a pretty nice edge.
    It is well worth your time to clean up one of those Warranted Superiors and give it new life. For rip, IMO pick the longest blade you've got.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    Edmond, Oklahoma
    Posts
    1,752
    Steve,

    A couple of thoughts. First, your Stanley saw is designed to cut extremely fast, compared to a standard cross cut saw. However, there is of course no free lunch. They are not designed to make smooth finish cuts. Even a very sharp 8 point cross cut saw with a standard tooth sharpening will cut quickly, but not that quickly. A very sharp 12 point finish cross cut will cut even more slowly. Back when I was carpentering we used an 8 pt CC for framing and a 10 or 12 point CC for finish work. I had a 4&1/2 point rip, and a 7 point rip, the 7 point for finish work.

    So, you are looking at a comparison that really isn't a very apples to apples comparison. If you were ripping a 4/4 poplar piece of lumber with 2 or 3 point rip saw it would cut fairly quickly, which would be a little closer to an apples to apples comparison to your Stanley, but I would not want to use such a saw for fine woodworking as the cut would be pretty rough. On the other hand if you make a comparison of say an 8 point standard crosscut saw vs a 5&1/2 point rip saw, or a 12 point crosscut saw with a 7 point rip, you have a more equivalent comparison.

    My experience with those comparisons is that the crosscuts cut more quickly than he rip saws, that is in doing the cuts that they were designed to do. In other words, the crosscut saw cutting across the grain compared to the rip saw employed in a rip cut. Jim explained the "why" that this is the case in his post up above.

    Neither of these will cut a quickly as the saw you describe.

    However, I can tell you that trying to do ripping with a cross cut saw is a slow and painful task. A rip saw will cross cut far better than a crosscut saw will rip. When ripping with a cross cut saw, the saw easily wanders away from the line you are trying to cut to, and cuts very slowly.

    In short, yes, convert at least one of those cross cut saws you have into a rip saw. For me a 4&1/2 or 5 point rip is for rough work or for thick stock. A 7 point rip is good for finish work. I think it is good to have one of each. Will it cut as quickly as your Stanley cross cuts.....no, but I think it will be a big improvement over what you experienced.

    One other thought, you do woodworking for enjoyment. I can tell you it is a LOT more pleasant to rip with an actual rip saw than to use a cross cut saw to rip with.

    Stew
    Last edited by Stew Denton; 04-29-2018 at 11:58 PM.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    2,534
    One of the important factors that can influence speed of cut is volume within the gullets. Where the ppi and forward rake angle is already determined, the volume within the gullets can be further inhanced by the addition of crosscut fleam. As an example, the following is a 7 ppi handsaw freshly sharpened to a rip tooth profile. (nil fleam)



    After completing 3 x20 full strokes of the saw on a test board of Aust. Jarrah, the rip teeth were then refiled with crosscut fleam.



    The same 3x20 full strokes of the saw were again repeated, and the following shows the difference gained in speed of cut by increasing gullet volume.



    Last edited by Stewie Simpson; 04-30-2018 at 1:30 AM.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Missouri
    Posts
    2,152
    Steve my take is like this. 3 to 6 for rip, 5 to 8 for cross cuts. 6 to 10 gets into the controversial panel saws. Above 10 are finish saws. I have used very few of the newer do everything saws and probably haven't touched one newer than the 1990s. I was not impressed. Of late I have taken to using Japanese saws. Because of back issues I can't saw on a saw bench any longer. I much prefer western saws, most likely because I used them more.
    Jim

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Pacific NW
    Posts
    14
    Perhaps this is not applicable, but nobody has mentioned this so I will. On your Stanley saw, are the teeth induction hardened? Many saws today the teeth are induction hardened and not suitable for resharpening. The teeth are too hard for the file to cut. Induction hardened teeth appear blackened or blued. I did a quick web search of these saws, some have hardened teeth, some don't. YMMV.

    JJ

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Longview WA
    Posts
    27,461
    Blog Entries
    1
    After completing 3 x20 full strokes of the saw on a test board of Aust. Jarrah, the rip teeth were then refiled with crosscut fleam.
    How many degrees of fleam?

    My experience is a little bit of fleam can help a rip saw. Enough fleam for a smooth cutting crosscut saw diminishes the ability to rip. One of my small saws has 5º fleam with the same rake. It cuts fairly well rip or crosscut.

    jtk
    Last edited by Jim Koepke; 04-30-2018 at 6:33 PM. Reason: spelling as usual
    "A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty."
    - Sir Winston Churchill (1874-1965)

  10. #10
    Quote Originally Posted by Jim Koepke View Post
    How many degrees of fleam?

    My experience is a little bit of fleam can help a rip saw. Enough fleam for a smooth cutting crosscut saw diminishes the ability to rip. One of my small saws has 5º fleam with the same rake. It cuts fairly well rip of crosscut.

    jtk
    I have a small cross cut panel saw. Think I will file it rip, and then give 'er about 5 degree of fleam. What could it hurt?
    Thanks for the idea.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Dickinson, Texas
    Posts
    7,655
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by Jim Koepke View Post
    How many degrees of fleam?

    My experience is a little bit of fleam can help a rip saw. Enough fleam for a smooth cutting crosscut saw diminishes the ability to rip. One of my small saws has 5º fleam with the same rake. It cuts fairly well rip or crosscut.

    jtk
    Showoff!

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    2,534
    Quote Originally Posted by Jim Koepke View Post
    How many degrees of fleam?

    My experience is a little bit of fleam can help a rip saw. Enough fleam for a smooth cutting crosscut saw diminishes the ability to rip. One of my small saws has 5º fleam with the same rake. It cuts fairly well rip or crosscut.

    jtk
    Jim; I applied a 15 degrees fleam angle.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    2,534
    A replacement handle for this saw is underway.




  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    twomiles from the "peak of Ohio
    Posts
    12,184
    Maybe try this stye, instead?
    IMG_4076 (640x480).jpg
    26" long, 10 ppi, skew back..iron/steel bolts
    IMG_4077 (640x480).jpg
    I haven't been able to work on them tiny teeth...but..
    IMG_4078 (640x480).jpg
    The saw as is leave a glass-like cut. Just wish I know who MADE the saw...

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    2,534
    Steven; have a look at pages 52 - 54 in the following 1922 Hibbard,Spenser,Bartlett & Co Catalogue.

    https://archive.org/details/HibbardS...ettCatalogNo69

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •