Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 32

Thread: combination table saw blade vs switching blades out

  1. #16
    Quote Originally Posted by Jim Becker View Post
    Simon, all of the Forrest blades I've owned have been dead on 1/8" kerf...it's one of the things that actually keeps me from trying other brands because so many of them are slightly different width of kerf. I don't want to have to deal with that since the Forrest is dead on lined up with both my riving knife and my scoring blade which is exactly 1/8" kerf. I'm using the 12" WW-II 48T most of the time now, but also have a couple of 10" 40T and the aforementioned 20T ripping monster.
    Thanks. A quick search found it...It is cheaper than a 40T, but it says it is for stock over 2" thick. In your experience, is it as good for 1" stock (50% of the lumber I use fall into this spec.) as a 40T WWII is?

    Simon

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    Posts
    4,717
    Quote Originally Posted by Simon MacGowen View Post
    That is interesting. Is 30T WWII available in 1/8" kerf?

    My riving knife is set to the right towards the fence side and I don't want to reset the riving knife when I use different blades; mine is a 40T WWII.

    Simon
    Yes....available in both 3/32" TK and 1/8" full kerf.
    Happiness is like wetting your pants...everyone can see it, but only you can feel the warmth....

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    SE PA - Central Bucks County
    Posts
    65,859
    Simon, I have been buying my Forrest blades from SilversMill these days as their pricing is a lot more attractive than "direct". And yes, you can use the blade for thinner stock, just understanding that the aggressive cutting action designed to power through thicker material isn't going to leave as smooth of a surface as you will get with more teeth on the 1" stock..
    --

    The most expensive tool is the one you buy "cheaply" and often...

  4. #19
    One advantage of a straightup rip is the flat tooth makes a square bottom kerf which is nice for cutting splines in boxes and such. Not a reason alone to have one, but an added perk.

    I did woodworking on the cheap most of my life and there is nothing wrong with going that way. Now that I am older, I still watch to dollar, but like to splurge on some quality stuff now that I can afford it. Prioritize!

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Location
    Central Missouri, U.S.
    Posts
    1,263
    Quote Originally Posted by Ron Citerone View Post
    One advantage of a straightup rip is the flat tooth makes a square bottom kerf which is nice for cutting splines in boxes and such. Not a reason alone to have one, but an added perk.

    I did woodworking on the cheap most of my life and there is nothing wrong with going that way. Now that I am older, I still watch to dollar, but like to splurge on some quality stuff now that I can afford it. Prioritize!
    Don't want to die with too much money in the bank. Somebody might spend it foolishly!

  6. #21
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Location
    Northern Illinois
    Posts
    950
    The April, 2018 issue of Fine Woodworking has a review of 40-tooth full kerf combination blades. It might be worth reading. The bottom line results were that the Freud Premier Fusion produced the best cross and rip cuts, but made ripping 8/4 hard maple slow. The next choice would be the Forrest WWII or Ridge Carbide TS2000, but these did not produce cuts that were as "perfect" as the Freud blade. I have a couple of Freud blades and always found their Fusion blades to be great for the majority of cross and rip cuts. Freud blades are generally reasonably priced also. However, no matter which blade I've used, if I'm ripping 8/4 hardwood, a good quality rip blade makes the job much easier and probably a little safer. I usually clean my rip cuts up on the jointer anyway.

  7. #22
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Winterville, NC (eastern NC)
    Posts
    2,365
    Just get another saw and use a cross cut on one machine and a rip on another.
    I currently have a sliding table saw and a conventional cabinet saw. Kind of overkill for a small shop, but what can I say; I'm a tool junkie. I switch out between a rip blade and a combination on the cabinet saw, and keep a cross cut on the slider.
    Change over on the cabinet saw is just a 2 minute drill. I believe your best cut quality will come from using a blade for it's intended purpose.
    Kind of a pain switching around, but it forces you to think ahead to your cutting operations.

  8. #23
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Toronto Ontario
    Posts
    11,274
    Quote Originally Posted by Simon MacGowen View Post
    Thanks. A quick search found it...It is cheaper than a 40T, but it says it is for stock over 2" thick. In your experience, is it as good for 1" stock (50% of the lumber I use fall into this spec.) as a 40T WWII is?

    Simon
    Simon, do you use your ripped material without any further processing such as jointing or planning?

    I don't so I use a 24T rip blade, material after that is jointed or planed.

    Regards, Rod.

  9. #24
    I find that a cross cut or general purpose or combination blade does a passable job on rip cuts < 1.5". On thicker material, these blades just don't work that well.

    A rip blade, however (30/24t) cuts thick stock all day long, effortlessly, and does a passable (for me) job on cross cuts, so my saw is permanently chucked with a ripping blade.

    I am running a 3hp saw.
    Last edited by Prashun Patel; 03-10-2018 at 8:28 AM.

  10. #25
    Quote Originally Posted by Rod Sheridan View Post
    Simon, do you use your ripped material without any further processing such as jointing or planning?

    I don't so I use a 24T rip blade, material after that is jointed or planed.

    Regards, Rod.
    Almost without exceptions, I edge joint boards (mostly 3/4" and 1" hardwood) on the tablesaw with a WWII 40t and go direct to clamping. Any machine marks on outside edges are handplaned off. Dominoes are also often used for large pieces.

    Simon

  11. #26
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Location
    Landenberg, Pa
    Posts
    431
    I've been running a Freud Premier Fusion for cross cuts and rips up to 8/4 (might get a dedicated rip blade if I keep up the 8/4 work), and a WWII flat tooth grind for cross cuts and flat bottomed grooves and such. These two in a pair seem to cover a lot my needs.

  12. #27
    Just got home from work, wow what a great response. Thanks for all the info.

    I feel the time spent changing blades will be worth it. I rip alot and cross cut just the same. So having to change blades will be and standard practice till I can get two cabinet saws. Lol.

  13. #28
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Central WI
    Posts
    5,666
    I have several saws and lots of industrial blades but I have to admit the WW2 stays on the big saw most of the time. Not because I think it to be the best brand, but because the scoring blades are matched to them. I spent a couple of hours ripping 4" oak with a 40T WW2 ( 16" and 9/64 ) and it worked well enough that I didn't bother with the rip blade. I rip faster with more teeth and have 9 hp so that helps but I also use the blade for panels with scoring and don't see enough difference with my panel blades to change either. Dave

  14. #29
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Central Illinois
    Posts
    81
    Buy another saw.

  15. #30
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Wakefield, MA
    Posts
    509
    Quote Originally Posted by Simon MacGowen View Post
    That is interesting. Is 30T WWII available in 1/8" kerf?
    Yes, it is. I've had one for several years, and it rips well and crosscuts almost as well as the 40-tooth.
    Last edited by Jim Becker; 03-10-2018 at 8:11 AM. Reason: fixed quote tagging

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •