Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 27

Thread: LV low angle jack...pmv or O1?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    463

    LV low angle jack...pmv or O1?

    I'm going to order the LV low angle Jack. I'd like to use it on the shooting board and for whatever else. (I want the ability to shoot right or left handed as I'm not sure how my right shoulder is going to hold up, so going this route versus the shooting plane.)

    Is the pmv11 advantageous in this case? I have come to prefer my O1 Stanley blades over the A2 in my Woodriver plane. Will pmv11 still be easy to sharpen and retain the edge a bit better? If it's not a significant advantage I'd just order O1.

    Thanks

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Perth, Australia
    Posts
    9,467
    I'd suggest either PM-V11 or A2. Either will serve you well with a 25 degree bevel on a 12 degree bed.

    I used an A2 blade for many years, and it never chipped. More recently I completed comparisons of the Veritas and LN shooting planes with a variety of blades. Both the PM and A2 blades performed superbly. O1 is not in the running for shooting end grain.

    Article: http://www.inthewoodshop.com/ToolRev...tingPlane.html

    Regards from Perth

    Derek

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    463
    Pmv11 it is. Thanks, Derek.

  4. #4
    What sort of sharpening equipment do you have? If you already own and use diamond plates or Scary Sharp - you will be able to sharpen either. If you have conventional Arkansas and India stones - I recommend you purchase the O1 iron so you can sharpen it with what you already have.

    If you can sharpen anything - then the next cut is the sort of wood you work 98% of the time....

    Soft woods like Spruce, Cedar, and Pine - O1. Hair popping sharp is the primary determinate.

    Medium density hardwoods like mahogany, maple, and walnut - either will work fine. The PM steel has the edge on life between sharpenings.

    Hard, dense, abrasive exotics - PM steel all the way.

    I very highly respect LV and all that Leonard Lee has done for the woodworking community... But forever now - every 5 or 10 years, the best ever new steel comes out and the whole world goes Ga-ga for it.... I have a stack of HSS irons I hate because I bought into that in the mid 2000's....

    And yes yes yes - this time it is different..... But the reality is still that nobody has ever been able to really unseat the Standard good properly heat treated high carbon steel - Because it works well and is easy to sharpen.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    463
    I've got diamonds for sharpening. Mix of soft and medium woods. I like the idea of the longer edge life on the pmv11.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Longview WA
    Posts
    27,347
    Blog Entries
    1
    My experience with PM-V11 is one blade that seems to stay sharp for a very long time.

    (I want the ability to shoot right or left handed as I'm not sure how my right shoulder is going to hold up, so going this route versus the shooting plane.)
    My situation is similar to yours from an old shoulder injury. My main shooting board is double sided. Tried looking for my old thread on this. Didn't have any luck and it is about time for me to run into town.

    Maybe it can be found later.

    jtk
    "A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty."
    - Sir Winston Churchill (1874-1965)

  7. #7
    Would you consider buying both irons... Their prices are quite reasonable... And that way - if you change your mind (or if something happens to LV) you will have the O1 iron..

    If it was a standard Stanley pattern - no problem.. They are available aftermarket...

    The only reason I keep going on about this is that I just bought a Stanley Made in China iron to replace the Made in England Stanley iron I cut up and tipped with HSS - and then didn't like it..

    And there are tons of people here who bought A2 irons and didn't like them either..

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Michiana
    Posts
    3,046
    I have the A2 blades with mine. No complaints.
    Sharp solves all manner of problems.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Location
    Dublin, CA
    Posts
    4,119
    Quote Originally Posted by Rob Luter View Post
    I have the A2 blades with mine. No complaints.
    LV's A2 irons are as good as anybody's in my experience. I suspect that they austenitize "hot" and then cryo treat just like LN, Hock, and everybody else with access to professional heat-treating. With that said the PM-V11 irons are as good or better in every respect except for cost. They're easier to hone on "slow" media like Arks, hold an edge longer, are less prone to tracking. and as a bonus they're stainless.

    I have several planes that use the same "05P34" iron family that you're asking about (LA jack, LA jointer, BU smoother, shooter) and I have those irons in both O1 and PM-V11. I think that the O1 irons are slightly more resistant to carbide chip-out and tracking when sharpened at low angle (~25 deg secondary), so I use them for final smoothing of cooperative grain at 37 deg where even the slightest hint of tracking is intolerable [*]. The PM-V11 irons are also capable of track-free results for low-angle final smoothing, but in my experience the O1 irons last a bit longer before they have to be rehoned in that specific application, because they dull more uniformly and continue to leave a more uniform finish even as they start to degrade. Both O1 and PM-V11 are better than A2 in that regard IMO.

    Other than that it's pretty much all PM-V11, all the time in those planes.
    [*] If I'm smoothing at such a low angle then that means I'm trying for maximum sheen/reflectivity, which in turn tends to show up any striations that the plane may leave.
    Last edited by Patrick Chase; 02-16-2018 at 11:02 PM.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Perth, Australia
    Posts
    9,467
    Quote Originally Posted by John C Cox View Post
    Would you consider buying both irons... Their prices are quite reasonable... And that way - if you change your mind (or if something happens to LV) you will have the O1 iron..

    If it was a standard Stanley pattern - no problem.. They are available aftermarket...

    The only reason I keep going on about this is that I just bought a Stanley Made in China iron to replace the Made in England Stanley iron I cut up and tipped with HSS - and then didn't like it..

    And there are tons of people here who bought A2 irons and didn't like them either..
    John, have you actually used the Veritas blades? Your comments appear predicated on an experience with HSS blades. I apologise if I am going to come across strong and insistent, but the comparison with HSS muddies the waters.

    My advice for the LAJ with the various blades comes from over a decade of use in the shop with the LAJ, as well as testing them specifically for longevity. I have used PM-V11 from before it was offered for sale. To emphasise what I said earlier, both A2 and PM- V11 will perform exceptionally well at 25 degrees when shooting end grain (which is not something I would recommend for either steel if they were used in a BD plane). I recommend them over O1. If cost is a factor, go for the A2. My preference is PM-V11.

    I would agree with you that abrasion resistant steel is better honed on media designed for this purpose. However .. I hollow grind all my blades. This leaves a miminal amount of steel to sharpen. Even less-than-ideally-suited media, such as oil stones, will work as a result.

    Regards from Perth

    Derek

  11. #11
    Quote Originally Posted by Nathan Johnson View Post
    I'm going to order the LV low angle Jack. I'd like to use it on the shooting board and for whatever else. (I want the ability to shoot right or left handed as I'm not sure how my right shoulder is going to hold up, so going this route versus the shooting plane.)

    Is the pmv11 advantageous in this case? I have come to prefer my O1 Stanley blades over the A2 in my Woodriver plane. Will pmv11 still be easy to sharpen and retain the edge a bit better? If it's not a significant advantage I'd just order O1.

    Thanks
    Not going to argue with anyone who prefers O1 or A2. The fact is I got rid of all my O1 and most A2 blades and am using mainly PMV11 for ALL my planes. I have diamond stones and water stones and my sharpening regime has not changed due to the switch.

    If you want to listen to a practitioner and not a theorist or academic, get the PMV11 for that LAJ. It is NOT that more expensive as some may have put it. I like to say this: If that small difference hurts, forget about woodworking and take up reading as a hobby because 99% of other things in woodworking would cost more than that tiny difference. Lumber is one of them.

    One (type of) blade, one sharpening routine, just different angles. Period.

    Some people say PMV11 is harder to sharpen, they are not good at sharpening. I hone all PMV11 free hand and none will take more than 2 mins (1 min. or less in most cases)...just make sure you don't wait till it is too blunt. I don't strop by default either unless certain cuts demand it.

    Simon
    Last edited by Simon MacGowen; 02-16-2018 at 7:29 PM.

  12. #12
    I'd say that PMV11 is actually progress.

    While I'm not sure about the HAP40 in Stu's Tsunesaburo planes (don't have one), I find that the PMV11 sharpens pretty easily on ceramic stones...not as easy as 01, but easier than A2 (to me) and *much* easier than the HSS on the mujingfang planes.

    If you can sharpen A2...you can definitely sharpen PMV11

    For a lazy guy that doesn't like resharpening plane blades mid-project, I think that PMV11 is a winner...and usually just costs $10 more than the A2 offering.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    463
    The $12 difference isn't a concern in this case. It was a question of function in use.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Location
    Dublin, CA
    Posts
    4,119
    Quote Originally Posted by Derek Cohen View Post
    To emphasise what I said earlier, both A2 and PM- V11 will perform exceptionally well at 25 degrees when shooting end grain (which is not something I would recommend for either steel if they were used in a BD plane).
    This is very true. End-grain places a premium on wear resistance, and in my experience both A2 and PM-V11 are much better than O1 in that regard.

    O1's "special power" is that it dulls very uniformly and gradually even when honed at very low angles, which is beneficial when surface uniformity is a bigger concern than outright sharpness. PM-V11 is also good in that respect, and better than any A2 I've seen. End grain doesn't really test that attribute. Final smoothing can, depending on the circumstances.

    Quote Originally Posted by Derek Cohen View Post
    I would agree with you that abrasion resistant steel is better honed on media designed for this purpose.
    I think that depends on how large the carbides are. PM-V11's grain structure is tight enough that it can be brought to a good edge on basically anything, Arks included. A2, not so much. PM-V11 is noticeably slow on silicate media like Arks and Washitas, though.
    Last edited by Patrick Chase; 02-16-2018 at 11:03 PM.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Location
    Dublin, CA
    Posts
    4,119
    Quote Originally Posted by Derek Cohen View Post
    John, have you actually used the Veritas blades? Your comments appear predicated on an experience with HSS blades. I apologise if I am going to come across strong and insistent, but the comparison with HSS muddies the waters.
    Amplifying what Derek is saying here: The things that make steels both abrasion-resistant and difficult to hone are the carbides. PM-V11 contains very different carbides than HSS, so they're literally incomparable in terms of ease of sharpening.

    A2 and PM-V11 both derive their wear resistance from Chromium carbide, which has a Knoop hardness of ~1700. That's harder than the Quartz abrasive in an Ark (~800 Knoop) but softer than the Alumina in most synthetic waterstones and ceramic media such as Spyderco (~2100 knoop).

    In my experience the most common HSS alloys in hand tools are M2 and M4. Both contain Vanadium carbide, with M4 containing over twice as much V as M2. Vanadium carbide has a Knoop hardness of ~2700, and is immune to basically everything but CBN (Knoop hardness of ~5000) and diamond (~7000). John, your bad experiences with HSS were almost certainly caused by those Vanadium carbides, and are completely irrelevant to PM-V11. I wouldn't recommend CPM-3V or CPM-10V for you, though :-).

    The other thing that comes into play is grain size. When the abrasive you use is softer than the carbides in your steel, the abrasive ends up "eroding" the ferrite matrix around the carbides until they fall out. You can actually produce a perfectly good edge that way, but only if the carbides are similar in size to or smaller than the finest abrasive that you use to hone. That's true of PM-V11 most of the time, which is why a lot of people are perfectly happy with the results they get honing it on Arks and other silicate (quartz) media. It is generally not true of A2.
    Last edited by Patrick Chase; 02-16-2018 at 11:04 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •