Page 2 of 9 FirstFirst 123456 ... LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 126

Thread: Switch to Metric? Yes or No

  1. #16
    I have worked in Inches for so long it's just easier for me, but could work metric if needed. For woodworking I will stick with inches until I find a real advantage to metric. They are all just numbers in the end.

  2. #17
    As I've noted in other thread, I've switched to metric for CNC work, but use Imperial for all hand work --- esp. if it involves dividing by thirds / sixths / twelfths, &c. If need be, I break out a desktop publishing points ruler to get 72 points per inch which pretty much always guarantees that distances will be some nice even number as opposed to the irrational values which dividing into thirds using metric usually results in.

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Helensburgh, Australia
    Posts
    2,710
    Quote Originally Posted by Ron Citerone View Post
    I have worked in Inches for so long it's just easier for me, but could work metric if needed.
    Everyone in every country that has converted has said similar things including me. I don't know of anyone in Oz who has regretted changing systems.
    Chris

    Everything I like is either illegal, immoral or fattening

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    5,582
    Quote Originally Posted by William Adams View Post
    As I've noted in other thread, I've switched to metric for CNC work, but use Imperial for all hand work --- esp. if it involves dividing by thirds / sixths / twelfths, &c. If need be, I break out a desktop publishing points ruler to get 72 points per inch which pretty much always guarantees that distances will be some nice even number as opposed to the irrational values which dividing into thirds using metric usually results in.
    What benefit do you see in using metric for CNC? I'm not seeing it.

    The ONLY reason I'd switch would be for some as yet unidentifiable customer or material reason.
    Last edited by Pat Barry; 02-06-2018 at 8:26 PM.

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Location
    Tasmania
    Posts
    2,162
    As I may (well, certainly) have mentioned some time back, the country that put men on the moon did not do it alone. That county's eyes and ears for half the time were on the other side of the globe. So please don't trot out irrelevant excuses.

    More to the point, use whatever system you want. Australia changed systems as a nation when I was in school. We all got over the shock, and the sky didn't fall on our heads. I learnt both systems and understand both systems but use metric because that is the official system. It's like I speak English because that is our official language but it doesn't stop me understanding Polish (especially the curses....!).

    I believe the key to the change in Australia was that there was clear leadership with the issue. Also, Australia adopted units in multiples of 1000 ie microns, millimetres, metres and kilometres. Centimetres are not official and never appear on technical drawings. That way everything has up to 3 decimal places for each unit. If you want to go smaller than microns, be my guest.

    We have an extensive range of CNC machining centres here. Most of our operators are in the 55-70 age bracket. They all learnt machining in imperial and much prefer working in metric.

    I do recall my boss back in about '74 commenting how measurement errors dropped markedly when metric was introduced. That was in residential construction.Cheers
    Every construction obeys the laws of physics. Whether we like or understand the result is of no interest to the universe.

  6. #21
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Edmonton, Canada
    Posts
    2,479
    Quote Originally Posted by Martin Wasner View Post
    There's two kinds of countries. Those that put a man on the moon, and those that use the metric system....
    One of the most ..... comments I've read here.

  7. #22
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Location
    Marietta, GA
    Posts
    275
    I work with Russian plywood all the time and it's definitely metric. 18 mmish by 1220 mm by 2440 mm. Says so right on the label. Now grab your calculator and see if it's the supplier or the consumer that's determining the size of the "metric" plywood.

    I've run into all kinds of stuff in construction that's "metric" but when you convert you find that it's based on an imperial standard. Not just construction either. If you know anything about firearms you've heard of the AK47 round which is 7.62x39. That's a bullet diameter of 7.62 mm. Guess what that converts to. 0.300", which is "30 caliber".

    Since base 10 is so much better when are we all going to change our method of telling time?

  8. #23
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Location
    Marietta, GA
    Posts
    275
    Quote Originally Posted by mreza Salav View Post
    One of the most ..... comments I've read here.
    Accurate??

  9. #24
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    NE Iowa
    Posts
    1,237
    For woodworking measurements, which are almost all about length, I am pretty indifferent - either works equally well for me. Sometime the binary fractions are handier, sometimes the decimal. If, for example, I am working a Golden Ratio in a design, or need to subdivide a length by anything that isn't a power of 2, I use metric for ease of calculation. For most woodworking measurements, though, decimal has no particular advantage. As a result, I sometimes use both on the same project. For everything else, the SI measurements make so much more sense because of the overall logic of how the different measurements relate. I of course use the Imperial measurements for volume and weight to buy food and gasoline, because that's how stuff is packaged and sold for the most part. But I'd prefer metric, and I do everything involving any physics more complicated than volume in SI.

  10. #25
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Sterling, Virginia
    Posts
    645
    I agree it does not matter which system but choose one for the job and stick to it. The problems start with "what's metric for 15/32?"

  11. #26
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    New Westminster BC
    Posts
    2,999
    Quote Originally Posted by Walter Plummer View Post
    I agree it does not matter which system but choose one for the job and stick to it. The problems start with "what's metric for 15/32?"
    and ends with what's imperial for 12mm?

  12. #27
    I recently did a construction job (about a year worth of work) that had metric plans. The only place we really measured in metric was for the block walls. 40cm per course, couldn't do the conversion on my head for more than one course. Then we switched over immediately to a job with imperial measurements on the plan. I'm not going to lie, it took some focus to mentally switch gears.

  13. #28
    When doing cabinets, I use metric almost exclusively. Decimal inches are a close second, but I've given up on fractions for anything where I need to add and subtract a bunch of numbers (overlays, reveals, etc.). Too much time and too many errors.

    I do find mm a little easier and little more intuitive than decimal inches. Maybe because it's a completely different system whereas with inches I keep reverting to trying to think in terms of fractions.

    For furniture, I'll use either system. Sometimes it's inches for the conceptual stuff and then mm and story sticks when it comes time to build, or sometimes all inches.

  14. #29
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    NE Ohio
    Posts
    7,015
    My $19.99 Harbor Freight Imperial/metric/decimal/fractional caliper makes switching back and forth just a simple matter of touching a button ......plus...it measures things too!
    "Life is what happens to you while you're busy making other plans." - John Lennon

  15. #30
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Perth, Australia
    Posts
    9,489
    I use both systems, and often use them alongside one another ... that can be confusing for some who read my notes!

    Metric is definitely easier when one has to add together what otherwise would involve fractions. For example, 2.5mm + 2.75mm vs 2 1/2" + 2 3/4".

    Metric is easier when working from my European machines, especially the thicknesser (planer), which is Metric. It does not make any difference with the Festool Domino machine, since an exact position (in numbers) is not important.

    Imperial raises its head because I must allow for the fact that all my hand tool joinery planes and chisel blades are in Imperial (e.g. plough plane, router plane, mortice chisels, dado plane).

    Also, it is easier to visualise 6 feet than 1828.8mm or 1.828m!

    My tape measures contain both sets of numbers.

    Much of the time tape measures are for rough work anyway. Most of my measuring is done with a cutting gauge or from parts.

    Regards from Perth

    Derek

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •