Last edited by Jim Becker; 10-29-2017 at 8:33 PM. Reason: fixed quote tagging
See, I still disagree with that. I'm sure the codes exist to have standards on removing moisture, but they are definitely installed to remove odors, too.
I work as the maintenance tech in an historic courthouse. The building had a major renovation completed just over 25 years ago. A small part of that renovation was to install an extensive network of ventilation fans--there is nary a shower in the building, and sinks/toilets/urinals don't generate much moisture. If one of the fans goes down, the complaints begin to roll in about the smells. On top of that, in a prior life, I was a painting contractor--I painted quite a few bathrooms that had a separate W.C.--with its own fan.
Agree with Jason. Odors are of no concern to the code writers so they don't mention them. Few fans would be sold with
"keeps your bath room from smelling like a sewer! ". At least the companies that make "personal lubricants" have not decided to advertise their product is "great for those who have to clean heating ducts".
While this will not help settle the purpose of a bathroom fan, for confined space safety, the main concern is asphyxiation due oxygen displacement/depletion. You generally use positive pressure to ventilate a confined space because you fix the source of the replacement gas and can be assured that it has sufficient O2 to sustain life. In negative ventilation, the source of the replacement gas is unknown--you may be drawing in gas that has lower levels of OZ than the confined space.