Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 23

Thread: Is there a cheap MFT out there?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Upstate NY
    Posts
    3,789

    Is there a cheap MFT out there?

    Now that a number of companies have copied Festool's tracksaw, has anyone copied the MFT?
    It is a great tool, but $625 is a lot of money.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    San Francisco, CA
    Posts
    1,408
    I haven't seen one. The cheap alternative to buying one is to try to make it yourself - but it's sort of a pain if you want to make one that works exactly like Festool's and with all the Festool accessories.

    There are CNC templates available out there for the top. The frame can be made from 80/20 extrusions.

    I'd be curious to hear how much money people actually save by making their own MFT that has the same clamping and guide rail functionality, and is possibly compatible with Festool's clamps and accessories (which require 20mm holes and a top no thicker than 3/4").

    Most who own the MFT say it's one of their top Festools...I'm heavily invested in Festool but personally haven't been able to justify the MFT.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Columbia, MO
    Posts
    63
    If you just want to do square cross cutting, you can buy an MFT replacement top and work with qwas dogs to make use of the predcise square pattern. The MFT feels like a lot of money to fork out for a collapsible table, but I enjoy working with it. However, I looked long and hard into making my own version. That is the route I would have gone. It may work for other track saws too.

  4. #4
    This question has been on my mind this last month. Thinking of ditching the TS altogether and thinking about investing some serious time and effort into some kind of MFT. I haven't actually seen one up close. Can somebody tell me in 50 words or less, what the table "does?" Hope this question isn't terribly out of line, but I have time, lumber, and the ability to design tables, so it might be a worthy enterprise.
    thanks
    russ

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    santa clarita ca.
    Posts
    155
    what's an MFT

  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by larry senen View Post
    what's an MFT
    Multi Function Table

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Northeast Ohio
    Posts
    582
    As Victor indicated, the MFT is one of my most useful tools. I thought long and hard about buying it but decided to in the end.

    For me, It enabled me to make flat panels. In combination with the track saw, I was also able to get square panels and components. It makes a nice large flat surface that I use when finishing (after covering the top with plastic sheeting). It holds items nicely when using the router. I prefer to cut my dados with a router for that reason. It is the most frequently used tool and one I would not wish to do without.

    I should add that my shop is very small (<180 sq ft) so it has become a comfortable place to work from. I've adjusted my process around the MFT. For me, it was a good decision.

  8. #8
    My reading of the posts on the big Festool group is that most people who tried to build their own MFT - with most of the functionality - end up spending just as much doing so, and I believe that's without their time being figured in. There's a lot of discussions out there about building your own MFT/3. Do a search for "MFTC Festool plans", and you'll see what I think is pretty much the state-of-the art for DIY MFT alternatives. Also search for "Ron Paulk Ultimate Work Bench" to see another popular design. Both guys sell plans for these tables/benches, and both are active members in the Festool community.

    As for the MFT/3 itself: The holes are more precisely located than most of us could do - though whether or not that is necessary, is another question. Off-hand, I can't think of a how I would use the precise spacing - what's really important is that the lines of holes are parallel or at right-angles to each other, and the Festool holes are. That's what allows the system to cut straight and square panels.

    If you want to save money, and perhaps even if you don't need to, I might recommend you look at buying the MFT/3 Basic. That's the one without the extra doo-dads like angle unit. Frankly, with the advent of Qwas dogs and rail dogs (and the copies of same), they're mostly useless - I know I haven't pulled any of my accessories out in forever. Having said that, you will need a guide rail (unless you have a rail from another track saw), and after accounting for the cost of the guide rail, the Full MFT/3 is only a few dollars more than the Basic. Note that the Makita guide rails are (mostly?) compatible with Festool - so if you have a Makita saw and rail, I'd probably recommend just the Basic MFT/3. Not sure about Dewalt's saw or the rest of the Makita stuff.

    I definitely wouldn't buy the FS/SYS.

    If I had to do it all over again - and needed to save my pennies, I'd buy a Basic and some dogs. Whatever you do, buy some dogs designed for the MFT/3 AND some rail dogs. They work way faster and more accurately for the vast majority of operations most of us might have to do. IMO, Steve Qwas totally changed the way most people will work with their MFTs. Lee Valley also just released a cool set of MFT dogs and clamping accessories in a nice box, but IIRC there are no rail dogs.

    And once you're freed from the accessories, then the side extrusions become far less important - whereas they're crucial for the full range of operations with the "full" MFT/3 set. With just the Basic set, you can still use the side extrusions for general clamping, but you could lay regular t-track or Kreg clamp track on the side of a bench and do the same thing.

    So at the heart of it, what the MFT gives you is a work surface with holes that are precisely arranged as to spacing and geometry. As far as I am concerned, if you can get the latter part right, you get most of the functionality. I'm at the point where I'm tired of spending my shop time building things for my shop, so I'd still probably buy.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    SF Bay Area, CA
    Posts
    15,332
    The KEY to the MFT is the precision spacing and arrangement of the holes in the top. The top is carefully CNC machined to be very precise. Someone mentioned QWAS and the Qwas dogs and Qwas rails. Combine these two excellent (albeit spendy) tools and you have one helluva precise, square, parallel surface to reference off of to build your projects. I have TWO MFT1080: one I bought new 9 years ago and another I picked up off of Craigslist for $300 a few years later. I like the ease with which it is to move around and put away.

    Take a look at these videos and decide for yourself:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cXCatsDERM0 (Overview of the MFT1080)

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AKHNEBpKnSI (Part 2, goes more into mods and Qwas)

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ipJQlcl3cHk (Part 3, more Qwas stuff)
    Wood: a fickle medium....

    Did you know SMC is user supported? Please help.

  10. #10
    Quote Originally Posted by Chris Padilla View Post
    The KEY to the MFT is the precision spacing and arrangement of the holes in the top
    Chris,

    I agree that the arrangement is key - I just don't see the importance of the particular spacing. As long as the lines of holes are parallel and at right angles to the columns of holes, I don't think the precise spacing is important. When is it ever important that one dog hole is some increment of 96mm from the next, in this context (except for maybe using the holes to cut 45s)?

    If the holes were centered 90 or 100mm apart, what would change about the way one uses the system ? If nothing, I think recognition of this makes the task of possibly building one's own MFT much easier. If something, I'd be happy to be enlightened.

    Further, you could still make square cuts with rail dogs and dogs if the spacing between rows and columns of holes *varied* between rows and columns, as long as rows were perpendicular to columns. You couldn't cut 45s, but could do everything else.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    San Francisco, CA
    Posts
    1,408
    Quote Originally Posted by Kelly Colin Mark View Post
    Chris,

    I agree that the arrangement is key - I just don't see the importance of the particular spacing. As long as the lines of holes are parallel and at right angles to the columns of holes, I don't think the precise spacing is important. When is it ever important that one dog hole is some increment of 96mm from the next, in this context (except for maybe using the holes to cut 45s)?

    If the holes were centered 90 or 100mm apart, what would change about the way one uses the system ? If nothing, I think recognition of this makes the task of possibly building one's own MFT much easier. If something, I'd be happy to be enlightened.

    Further, you could still make square cuts with rail dogs and dogs if the spacing between rows and columns of holes *varied* between rows and columns, as long as rows were perpendicular to columns. You couldn't cut 45s, but could do everything else.
    One example of the spacing being important (or planned) is that the Kapex can be secured on the MFT grid (its feet fit into the holes). I'm not sure if there are other such uses of the 96mm grid pattern, but that's one that comes to mind. Not that that by itself is a big deal...

    By the way, spacing at 96mm is super easy if you also happen to use Festool's LR32 system.

  12. #12
    Awesome response for me. A+ on the essays with bibliographies. I haven't tried making a shelf pin template on my smallish vertical mill with no digital readout. It would probably be more accurate than my last one that was done with the most precise possible manual layout and a drill press. But I would guess it still wouldn't touch a CNC-drilled layout.

    ( BTW, I was just thinking about this yesterday. Remember how difficult blue book exams could be in college sometimes? Look how enjoyable and easy they are now in our adulthood! )
    Thanks,
    Russ

  13. I just remembered that (I believe) one can order replacement MFT/3 tops. So if one wanted the precision-spaced holes but didn't want to have it CNC'ed themself, they should be purchasable from a Festool dealer.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Pleasant Grove, UT
    Posts
    1,503
    Quote Originally Posted by Kelly Colin Mark View Post
    Chris,

    I agree that the arrangement is key - I just don't see the importance of the particular spacing. As long as the lines of holes are parallel and at right angles to the columns of holes, I don't think the precise spacing is important. When is it ever important that one dog hole is some increment of 96mm from the next, in this context (except for maybe using the holes to cut 45s)?
    96mm is a multiple of 32mm, ergo, working within the 32mm Euro cabinetry standard is simplified. Would this be critical? Dunno.
    It came to pass...
    "Curiosity is the ultimate power tool." - Roy Underhill
    The road IS the destination.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Mercer Island
    Posts
    185
    I'm working up to doing an MFS (Multi Function Slab). There's a longish discussion of this on the FOG.

    I have a quote from a local (Seattle) CNC shop for $75 for the slab, and they can source the Lightweight MDF sheet for $58.

    And I have a couple of the (surprisingly expensive but highly regarded) 36" metal Storehorses in-coming.

    There's one challenge with a longish span of MDF / Lightweight MDF, and that is sag. I have purchased a 100m roll of fiberglass rodding and plan to practice on some built-in shelving that has some sag first.

    The last remaining issue is how to secure the MFS to the Storehorses...

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •