Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Pricing 8/4 versus 13/16

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Hatfield, AR
    Posts
    1,170

    Pricing 8/4 versus 13/16

    Maybe someone can shed some light on this for me.

    My distributor charges for per board foot of 8/4 red oak than 13/16. Both quotes are planed and straight lined. A board foot is a board foot. I could see a higher price if they were charging lineal feet.

    What gives?
    -Lud

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    N.E, Ohio
    Posts
    3,029
    Quote Originally Posted by Justin Ludwig View Post
    Maybe someone can shed some light on this for me.

    My distributor charges for per board foot of 8/4 red oak than 13/16. Both quotes are planed and straight lined. A board foot is a board foot. I could see a higher price if they were charging lineal feet.

    What gives?
    I assume you are saying he charges more per board foot of 8/4 than he does per board foot of 13/16. This is common where I purchase my material also and I have used various dealers..
    George

    Making sawdust regularly, occasionally a project is completed.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Hatfield, AR
    Posts
    1,170
    I got an answer from my distributor that seems to make sense.

    "The 8/4 needs considerably more air-drying time... has to be cut from significantly larger logs (which cost more).... needs to stay in the kiln longer... has more D-grade that is pulled out. So yes, production costs are WAY higher... including the green buying costs."
    -Lud

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Deep South
    Posts
    3,970
    I would say that pricing strategy is pretty much normal. It's like buying extra wide boards.

  5. #5
    When traveling, I look for nice 8/4. It's usually more.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Escondido, CA
    Posts
    6,224
    It is a little more difficult to get thicker boards out of a tree, so they charge a little more per board foot.
    Veni Vidi Vendi Vente! I came, I saw, I bought a large coffee!

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Tyler, Texas
    Posts
    2,041
    "The 8/4 needs considerably more air-drying time... has to be cut from significantly larger logs (which cost more).... needs to stay in the kiln longer... has more D-grade that is pulled out. So yes, production costs are WAY higher... including the green buying costs."

    This.
    Cody


    Logmaster LM-1 sawmill, 30 hp Kioti tractor w/ FEL, Stihl 290 chainsaw, 300 bf cap. Solar Kiln

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    South Central Pennsylvania, USA
    Posts
    761
    Yep - thinner, narrower, shorter lumber will always be cheaper than thicker, wider, longer lumber because the thicker, wider, longer lumber has less stock to pull from and requires more care and attention to bring to a usable state.

  9. #9
    It takes 2.5 times as long to dry a 8/4 board than a 4/4 board. Plus, the thicker stock generally will have more drying defects like splits, cracks, and checks. In the wholesale market, 8/4 stock sells for about 1.25 -1.35 times the price per board foot versus 4/4 of the same species. That is the nature of the market.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •