Thanks for all the reply's.
This is the first time I have heard construction lags (i.e. spax, timeberlox, etc.) down talked over traditional lags. I have always understood it that construction lags/screws are a harder steel, therefor thinner gauge, but with sharper and larger threads. Old lags just have a sloppy look compared to construction lags to me. Thick, dull, and with flaky galvanized coatings. But I am no metalurgist so I don't really have a clue.
I do know that the Benchcrafted plans calls for tapped threads and bolts in the vise installation, but for the top to upper rail joining calls for spax. Not sure the specific reasoning to use tapped bolts in one application and spax in another, but that is what's called for.
"There's no space needed for clearance in the mortises.
Those are glue joints - expansion forces are directed elsewhere."
I am not sure I know what you mean Jim. The tenon joining the stretchers to the legs, and the tenons joining legs into the top have grain oriented 90 degrees to their accompanying mortises . So movement in the cheeks of the tenons are at 90 degrees to movement in the mortise walls and could over power a glue joint if sufficient.
The point about tradition roubo's with their 'bridle dovetail-esque' leg to top joint and how the leg vise would push on the leg itself is interesting. I never thought of that. With the Benchcrafted design the top does attach with large mortise tenons though, which should be more than sufficient to stay put (so long as those mortise tenons stay relatively tight, hence the question about tenon movement).