Interesting, I almost had the same thought after using a friend's L-N #5....I've used the same Vintage Stanley for the last 25 years or so, and its done fine as a Jack plane...The L-N plane I really lust after is the 5 and 1/4 "Junior Jack" as I think it would be nice as a small jointer. Since I tend to build stuff a little on the smaller side, and since I use my regular #5 Stanley to Joint with, and Jack with....a 5 and 1/4 might do nicely for me at some point.
Ralph, I have a couple of old street planes - smoother and jack. I also have an Ohio tools wooden try. I thought I was set with these but found I had trouble holding the front in use. I have a union #5 with a tote that was damaged in shipping (threaded rod won't screw down) that I found much more comfortable to use and started me looking.
Another thought to add to my confusion; when I called they suggested I try a low angle jack (#62)? I know we talked about it a little before but...
That's what I keep coming back to. LV just seems to have a better grasp of the small things that make it more enjoyable for me.
I order an extra blade for the 4 1/2 to grind with a camber.
LV is creating revolutionary innovations in plane design.That's what I keep coming back to. LV just seems to have a better grasp of the small things that make it more enjoyable for me.
LN is making replicas of Stanley planes at a higher quality than Stanley ever considered.
They are both making very fine tools for different markets.
My LN #62 works great in my shop, even with the need to occasionally tap the side of the blade with a small mallet.
jtk
"A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty."
- Sir Winston Churchill (1874-1965)
This whole discussion seems rather subjective. Better for you is not better for me. I love the LV products especially the router plane and chisels. On the other hand, I really dislike the totes on the LV planes. For my hands, the LN totes are far more comfortable.
On the other hand, to me a difference in a jack plane is relatively unimportant. Stanleys or others do fine for me. Smoothers, on the other hand, I use a a precision instrument (one might legitimately argue that my skills are not commensurate to the instrument). I care far more there (he says having three smoothers - (1) LN with standard frog, (1) with HAF or gnarly grain, & an old Stanley type 11, #4.
Shawn
"no trees were harmed in the creation of this message, however some electrons were temporarily inconvenienced."
"I resent having to use my brain to do your thinking"
Hilton,
Either you have a "unique" style all your own or you need to turn off your automatic sub spell checker.
Makes for some entertaining reading from our angle though.
(maybe you shouldn't turn it off)
I agree with you though.
Last edited by Winton Applegate; 07-25-2013 at 12:39 AM.
Sharpening is Facetating.Good enough is good enoughButBetter is Better.
You are right of coarse that every body has to judge for them selves . . . how ever . . .I really dislike the totes on the LV planes
Do you own any of the LV planes ?
The reason I ask is BEFORE I bought and used an LV long term I thought the totes on LVs were plane Jane and they just cut corners.
AFTER
I spent a great deal of time on both LN and LV I can "testify" (he said quaking and eyes rolling heavenwards palm out stretched; fervor on his lips)
The LVs ain't bad. Better than pretty good, they are fine FOR ME and actually the LN bevel up jack's beautifully curvaceous and larger handle hurts my palm with a chronic bruising that I finally had to adapt to.
For any one on the fence I would recommend buying at least one LV and giving it heck for a few weeks before writing them off.
PS: photos are of my LV BU large finish plane. LOVE THAT PLANE.
I made this bubbinga table in my shop, moved it up stairs into the living space and it changed enough I had to re flatten it before finish planing it. I planed on finish planing it after I moved it because it is so heavy I figured I would mar it up a bit just moving it. Anyway LVBU and I have spent quite a bit of time together.
Pretty much not going to put more force through the handle than on this extra hard sheee . . . wood. (whoa almost lost another point there).
PPS: David W and David B,
This here's what "real" sharpening looks like boys.
Last edited by Winton Applegate; 07-25-2013 at 1:36 AM. Reason: PSS: to David W and David B
Sharpening is Facetating.Good enough is good enoughButBetter is Better.
This does seem to be a trend strangely enough. Although nothing like a rasp to fix the shape of the tote hey? It seems infinitely easier than trying to retrofit another brand of plane with the niceties that Veritas throws in. They even give you free templates to show you where to correctly drill the appropriate holes for the mounting bolts. Nothing stops you modifying the overall shape after that.
"If you have all your fingers, you can convert to Metric"