Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 28

Thread: Toyota Tundra

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Cincinnati Ohio
    Posts
    4,734

    Toyota Tundra

    Like to hear from owners of the Toyota Tundra. The good, the bad and the ugly.
    Just kinda in the research stage of looking at new trucks. I now own a 1997 F-150 Love the truck. Had to replace the engine at 74K. Just like to drive something different.

    Interested in what engine size you have and what kinda gas mileage they get.

    What about the rusted frame issue, Is this no longer a problem?
    Last edited by Dave Lehnert; 01-11-2011 at 1:03 AM.
    "Remember back in the day, when things were made by hand, and people took pride in their work?"
    - Rick Dale

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Olathe, Kansas
    Posts
    251
    I have an '05 Tundra (last/smaller body style) with over 60K miles. The only thing I've done is change the oil. It has a V8 (4.7L I think) and gets in the neghborhood of 20 mpg hwy at speed limit. Don't know anything of a rusted frame issue. I'll watch this thread to learn more.

    Andy

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Hot Springs, VA
    Posts
    765
    Just give to my son my 2006 Tundra Limited and bought 2010 Tundra Limited. I loves this car. Milage on my old with 5.7 L engine were about 12-14 in the city, new one around 15 with same engine. Never have any problem. New one little bit bigger body with smaller turn radius. Very soft, smooth driving. I have nothing at all to complain about. One of my friend after driving my new car - replaced his F-150 to Toyota Tundra.

    Ed.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Washington's Coast
    Posts
    1,767
    I have an 07 Tundra with the 4.7l V8. I get about 14/19 but can push it up to 20 by keeping it <60. IIRC the frame rust issue was resolved a few years ago. I have had this truck for almost 4 years, 48K and plan to drive it until it won't go any more. Much more comfortable than the 2 F-150's I owned previously.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Appleton, WA
    Posts
    148
    Dave ..... I had an 05 Tundra Limited, all the bells and whistles with leather seats. Very nice truck. However I could not find the right adjustment in the seat that I was comfortable with. I drive down to California to see my daughter and family and it was just uncomfortable. So I traded it in on a new Dodge Ram(2008) 5.7 liter and am very happy with it. I have made two trips back to Missouri(5000 miles round trip) and get respectable gas mileage. Sometimes around 20 MPG. First thing I did when I got the Dodge was to have dual exhaust put on. I think that has helped. Its a little loud sometimes when I pull my camping trailer and I'm going uphill. But it works for me. Now the newer Tundras may have more comfortable seats.

    Rod<---in Appleton, WA

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    NE Oklahoma
    Posts
    391
    I have a 2001 Tundra with (IIRC) the 4.7L V8 and get 15 MPG in town and no better than 18 MPG on the road. Overall, great truck and no regrets during the 120K+ miles driven. I do have a big problem now though -- O2 sensor has failed and according to the dealer -- unable to remove the O2 sensor from the exhaust manifold so repair estimate is $1600 to replace both the exhaust manifold and the O2 sensor. $300 sensor replacement actually costing $1600 is a bummer. I've read I may be able to saturate with pentrating oil and free it but haven't tried it yet.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    UP of MI
    Posts
    38
    I have a 2003 with a 4.7L v-8. I get about 16 mpg - about 80% of my driving is county or state roads. I have 108K on it and it still is a very nice ride. It's pretty dinged up 'cause it's my grouse hunting vehicle. The only things I don't like about it are the big turning circle and the 6 foot bed. I really miss the 8 footer I had on my F-150. It also took me a while to learn how to drive an automatic transmission - never had one before this truck.

    Again, a nice comfortable ride for me (I'm 5'-10' and ~200lbs)

    Archie

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Elizabeth City, NC
    Posts
    190
    Quote Originally Posted by Jim McFarland View Post
    I have a 2001 Tundra with (IIRC) the 4.7L V8 and get 15 MPG in town and no better than 18 MPG on the road. Overall, great truck and no regrets during the 120K+ miles driven. I do have a big problem now though -- O2 sensor has failed and according to the dealer -- unable to remove the O2 sensor from the exhaust manifold so repair estimate is $1600 to replace both the exhaust manifold and the O2 sensor. $300 sensor replacement actually costing $1600 is a bummer. I've read I may be able to saturate with pentrating oil and free it but haven't tried it yet.
    Sounds like we have a similar truck. I have a 2000 5.7(i think) V8, with 175K+ on it, O2 sensor has been on for about a year. One problem I was told is there is 3 sensors, and a dealer would have to check which one. I just have ignored the "check" engine light. Only maintenance I have done is oil/filter change, it has had one set of spark plugs. I now have the valves making a louder tapping noise and I am looking into if they need to be adjusted.
    Overall it's been a great truck and when she dies, I would look at another.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    A suburb of Los Angeles California
    Posts
    644
    I have the 2005 Tundra with the V6 (I don't tow anything). I seem to get 22 city/25 hwy. I've got 80k miles on it and am quite happy.

    The one gotcha is the Tundra has a gross turning radius. Consumers Report warned about it, and they were right.
    AKA - "The human termite"

  10. #10
    I have an 05 and love it. about the same milage as everyone else, mostly depends on speed. turning radius is terrible, but that is the only downside. will drive it untill it won't go
    "Time flys like an arrow........ Fruit flies like a bannana."

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Cincinnati Ohio
    Posts
    4,734
    Quote Originally Posted by Andy Haney View Post
    I have an '05 Tundra (last/smaller body style) with over 60K miles. The only thing I've done is change the oil. It has a V8 (4.7L I think) and gets in the neghborhood of 20 mpg hwy at speed limit. Don't know anything of a rusted frame issue. I'll watch this thread to learn more.

    Andy
    http://usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/cars-trucks/daily-news/091009-Toyota-Tundra-Investigated-For-Severe-Frame-Rust-Problems/
    "Remember back in the day, when things were made by hand, and people took pride in their work?"
    - Rick Dale

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Seabrook, TX (south of Houston)
    Posts
    3,093
    Blog Entries
    3
    Not trying to dissuade you but check this site: http://www.ford.com/trucks/f150/gall...eos-and-demos/
    A series of videos comparing the F150 to Dodge Ram, Chevy Silverado, and Tundra. Of course, it is a Ford site so have your skeptic glasses on but still some good info.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Cincinnati Ohio
    Posts
    4,734
    Quote Originally Posted by Jim Rimmer View Post
    Not trying to dissuade you but check this site: http://www.ford.com/trucks/f150/gall...eos-and-demos/
    A series of videos comparing the F150 to Dodge Ram, Chevy Silverado, and Tundra. Of course, it is a Ford site so have your skeptic glasses on but still some good info.
    Thanks for the link, I will have a look.

    Like I said before, I love my Ford F-150 but having to put a new engine in it at 74K put a bad taste in my mouth. I purchased that truck new and had the 1997 engine issue from day one. Had it to the dealer many times for it. I put little miles on my truck so 74K took 11-12 years.( I did not know what the big issue was at the time, only problems I was having related to it) I've been looking at trucks and can't walk onto a Ford lot without the salesman looking at my truck and saying "Put a new engine in it yet?" Yes, Toyota had an issue with the Tundra with frames rusting but they are replacing frames free 7 or 8 years after purchase.
    After my problems I still feel Ford has the better quality truck. Just trying to decide if Ford deserves my $$$$$
    Last edited by Dave Lehnert; 01-11-2011 at 9:36 PM.
    "Remember back in the day, when things were made by hand, and people took pride in their work?"
    - Rick Dale

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Rutledge, GA
    Posts
    129
    For what little its worth, here's my experience with several truck manufacturers...

    My brother in law drove a 2001 for a few years until the gas cost got prohibitive - he's got about 1.5 hours of commuting each day. He was sad to see it go. The times I drove it, I liked everything about it except that blasted turning radius.

    From what I heard from my Dad (recent truck shopper) they got that fixed. He bought a 2009 Tacoma after looking at Ford/Chevy/Toyota. The Tundra was a bit much (too tall/wide/etc.) because he doesn't have a big boat, camper, or anything else. I like the Tacoma, except for the short windshield. He bought a 2005 F150 Crew Cab 4WD that he only kept for about 8 months, it had a suspension shudder that developed at about 45mph that Ford couldn't fix, and they bought it back. Kudos to Ford for good business, but he hasn't been fond of Ford since. He still has his 1992 F150 2WD 5.0L, its pretty solid and it rides good at over 130,000 miles.

    My boss has a 2005 Dodge Crew Cab 4wd 5.7L; I'm not overly impressed but its been pretty reliable. To me its big and a bit cumbersome, but that's just my preference as my eventual truck needs will involve dirt roads/trails with limited turnaround space. Also known as log/tree retrieval...

    One of our work trucks is a 2010 F150 Extended Cab 4WD with the smaller V8. Only 2000 miles on it so I can't comment as to reliability. I am NOT impressed, however, with the body panels and how they seem pretty thin and "cheap". I have a feeling they'll get dented pretty easily and don't contribute to an overall "solid" feel. The interior is ok, I just wish they would get rid of their wiper controls that haven't changed since at least 1992 (my dad's old for has the same control as my boss's 2010). The bed is also very deep, which is a bit of a pain in our field (parks and recreation). The "cheap" seats that it has aren't bad, and the headlights do a pretty good job at night, at least compared to the older trucks we have.

    Nope, my comments aren't worth a whole lot, but I'd give everything a good test drive (or two) and once you narrow it down, find someone who uses that truck similar to how you intend to. Personally I like our 2006 Rav4 (270hp makes for a fun drive), but its not a truck and I won't ever try to say that it is a substitute. One of these days I'll be look at 4wd (or AWD) with a 6 foot bed, but not real soon. I'll start at Toyota and go from there due to past experience and current ownership (Rav4 and 1993 Camry), but I won't rule out Ford as they've been doing some hard work on their stuff lately.

    Good luck!

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    SE PA - Central Bucks County
    Posts
    65,875
    I owned a 2000 Tundra Limited and it was a wonderful truck. The only reason I sold it was because after adopting the girls, we needed a vehicle that didn't have "suicide doors" for the back seats. (The four door version was not yet available back then) I'd buy another Tundra in a second if I ever went back to a pickup. I managed nearly 20 mpg on the highway (good at that point in time) and it was a very comfortable ride. Yes, the turning radius wasn't steller, but many full size pickups suffer from that.
    --

    The most expensive tool is the one you buy "cheaply" and often...

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •