Page 5 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 61 to 75 of 76

Thread: mm vs inches

  1. #61
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Princeton, NJ
    Posts
    7,298
    Blog Entries
    7
    Curt, that is typical of hardware store pricing on most things. I usually buy from McMaster Carr, except recently I decided to buy some bolts at the BORG and paid $2.80 for two bolts, not much until you consider that McMaster sells a pack of 50 of the same rated (8.8 4mm bolts) with a detail on COI for $8.50. If I bought 50 at the BORG I'd pay $70 for the same qty of bolts.
    Bumbling forward into the unknown.

  2. #62
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Michiana
    Posts
    3,079
    I've used decimal inch for 40+ years. I'll take that to my grave.
    Sharp solves all manner of problems.

  3. #63
    Join Date
    Nov 2021
    Location
    Mid West and North East USA
    Posts
    2,943
    Blog Entries
    2
    These little rulers are very helpful. Now if I can learn to keep track of my glasses. I need to find a metric ruler and metric tape measure. A poster size cheat sheet would be nice to have too.

    Screen Shot 2024-02-09 at 7.00.18 AM.pngScreen Shot 2024-02-09 at 6.59.38 AM.png Screen Shot 2024-02-09 at 6.58.38 AM.pngScreen Shot 2024-02-09 at 7.13.13 AM.jpg Screen Shot 2024-02-09 at 7.18.11 AM.jpg
    Last edited by Maurice Mcmurry; 02-09-2024 at 8:23 AM.

  4. #64
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    SE PA - Central Bucks County
    Posts
    65,898
    Maurice, both dual scale rulers and tapes are readily available as are metric only. For the tape, I like the FastCap (yellow label) as it actually stays out until you hit the button to retract. My dual scale rulers are from Lee Valley and are excellent. I acquired replacement metric rules for my squares from Lee Valley, too. I find having dual scale to be very helpful, even though I primarily work in metric. Not only does it mean the same measuring tools can be used regardless it also helps with visualizing the odd longer lengths which are "less natural". It's like learning a language when one didn't grow up speaking it (which is the case for many of us in the US, despite metric being heavily used in industry and science for a very long time now)...you learn a whole bunch of language up front but some of the more advanced grammar takes longer.
    --

    The most expensive tool is the one you buy "cheaply" and often...

  5. #65
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Newtown, ct
    Posts
    53
    I think in inches so decimal inches have worked for me as I don’t have to deal with fractions.

  6. #66
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Helensburgh, Australia
    Posts
    2,711
    Quote Originally Posted by Jim Becker View Post
    Maurice, both dual scale rulers and tapes are readily available as are metric only. For the tape, I like the FastCap (yellow label) as it actually stays out until you hit the button to retract. My dual scale rulers are from Lee Valley and are excellent. I acquired replacement metric rules for my squares from Lee Valley, too. I find having dual scale to be very helpful, even though I primarily work in metric. Not only does it mean the same measuring tools can be used regardless it also helps with visualizing the odd longer lengths which are "less natural". It's like learning a language when one didn't grow up speaking it (which is the case for many of us in the US, despite metric being heavily used in industry and science for a very long time now)...you learn a whole bunch of language up front but some of the more advanced grammar takes longer.
    When Australia went metric visualising the measurement was the hardest thing to do but I found using familiar items helped. A 6" rule is 150mm and a 12" is 300mm, a yard is very close to 39" etc. I was dragged into metric when the plans for my workshop arrived and by the time I finished I was convinced that metric was the way to go.
    Chris

    Everything I like is either illegal, immoral or fattening

  7. #67
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    SE PA - Central Bucks County
    Posts
    65,898
    Quote Originally Posted by Chris Parks View Post
    When Australia went metric visualising the measurement was the hardest thing to do but I found using familiar items helped. A 6" rule is 150mm and a 12" is 300mm, a yard is very close to 39" etc. I was dragged into metric when the plans for my workshop arrived and by the time I finished I was convinced that metric was the way to go.
    Yes, that's how I've managed the migration over the past 4+ years. It's only the "long lengths" that remain challenging, but it's not a concern because I measure things.
    --

    The most expensive tool is the one you buy "cheaply" and often...

  8. #68
    Join Date
    Nov 2021
    Location
    Mid West and North East USA
    Posts
    2,943
    Blog Entries
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by Jim Becker View Post
    Maurice, both dual scale rulers and tapes are readily available as are metric only. For the tape, I like the FastCap (yellow label) as it actually stays out until you hit the button to retract. My dual scale rulers are from Lee Valley and are excellent. I acquired replacement metric rules for my squares from Lee Valley, too. I find having dual scale to be very helpful, even though I primarily work in metric. Not only does it mean the same measuring tools can be used regardless it also helps with visualizing the odd longer lengths which are "less natural". It's like learning a language when one didn't grow up speaking it (which is the case for many of us in the US, despite metric being heavily used in industry and science for a very long time now)...you learn a whole bunch of language up front but some of the more advanced grammar takes longer.
    The FastCap looks perfect! Thanks, I ordered 3, one for me and 2 for the young men. Hoo-ray for Acme Tools!
    Best Regards, Maurice

  9. #69
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    SE PA - Central Bucks County
    Posts
    65,898
    Quote Originally Posted by Maurice Mcmurry View Post
    The FastCap looks perfect! Thanks, I ordered 3, one for me and 2 for the young men. Hoo-ray for Acme Tools!
    I really like the FastCap tapes. I don't use tapes for critical work, but they still have a place for sure. And the dual scale version covers all the bases for me. I'll likely get another for in the house/garage at some point and donate a few of the old tapes that have seen better days. I bought my FastCap tape on Amazon.
    --

    The most expensive tool is the one you buy "cheaply" and often...

  10. #70
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    642
    Just to deviate bit from inches vs mm, what I love about the metric system has to do with weight/volume units perhaps more useful in the kitchen than the shop but still applicable to mixing shop things too.
    In Canada, we are probably sitting on the fence (pickets, actually) because of our proximity to the US.
    Add 5 ounces of x, is that liquid 5 ounces or weight ounces - this vagueness is not a metric issue alone, but using metric makes it go away.
    Mix a gallon of banana oil into the dry ingredients - is that a US gallon (3.8 liters) or an Imperial gallon (4.54 liters)
    Pour in 1 cup of water - is that a US cup (1/2 US pint, 236ml) or an Imperial cup (250ml)

    While I'm at it, another source of major confusion here is date format.
    In US, the common form is Month-Day-Year so today (Feb 12) is 02-12-2024
    In Canada, what is sort of the common form is Day-Month-Year or 12-02-2024 although officially we are supposed to use the metric form.
    So when we see a numeric only date there is uncertainty unless the day is 13 and up because we get information both within Canada and the US.
    If everybody standardized on the metric form of YYY-MM-DD it would help a lot but...

  11. #71
    Join Date
    Dec 2019
    Location
    The old pueblo in el norte.
    Posts
    1,904
    Quote Originally Posted by Bill Howatt View Post
    Just to deviate bit from inches vs mm, what I love about the metric system has to do with weight/volume units perhaps more useful in the kitchen than the shop but still applicable to mixing shop things too.
    In Canada, we are probably sitting on the fence (pickets, actually) because of our proximity to the US.
    Add 5 ounces of x, is that liquid 5 ounces or weight ounces - this vagueness is not a metric issue alone, but using metric makes it go away.
    Mix a gallon of banana oil into the dry ingredients - is that a US gallon (3.8 liters) or an Imperial gallon (4.54 liters)
    Pour in 1 cup of water - is that a US cup (1/2 US pint, 236ml) or an Imperial cup (250ml)

    While I'm at it, another source of major confusion here is date format.
    In US, the common form is Month-Day-Year so today (Feb 12) is 02-12-2024
    In Canada, what is sort of the common form is Day-Month-Year or 12-02-2024 although officially we are supposed to use the metric form.
    So when we see a numeric only date there is uncertainty unless the day is 13 and up because we get information both within Canada and the US.
    If everybody standardized on the metric form of YYY-MM-DD it would help a lot but...
    DD-MM-YY is far more common world wide. I don't think people want to deal with years first. Since I work in an industry in which timestamps are a thing, I'd just like them to be the same. I guess we could just use Epoch, in which case it is currently ​1707749123
    ~mike

    happy in my mud hut

  12. #72
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Toronto Ontario
    Posts
    11,278
    Quote Originally Posted by mike stenson View Post
    DD-MM-YY is far more common world wide. I don't think people want to deal with years first. Since I work in an industry in which timestamps are a thing, I'd just like them to be the same. I guess we could just use Epoch, in which case it is currently ​1707749123
    Hi Mike, I thought the ISO standard was YYYY/MM/DD?

    Regards, Rod.

  13. #73
    Join Date
    Nov 2022
    Location
    Northern Colorado
    Posts
    1,138
    Quote Originally Posted by mike stenson View Post
    DD-MM-YY is far more common world wide. I don't think people want to deal with years first. Since I work in an industry in which timestamps are a thing, I'd just like them to be the same. I guess we could just use Epoch, in which case it is currently ​1707749123
    As a programmer I much prefer YY-MM-DD/YYYY-MM-DD as it will always naturally sort. As of this post current time is 1707751826

  14. #74
    Join Date
    Dec 2019
    Location
    The old pueblo in el norte.
    Posts
    1,904
    Quote Originally Posted by Rod Sheridan View Post
    Hi Mike, I thought the ISO standard was YYYY/MM/DD?

    Regards, Rod.
    It is, however, ISO standards are not really what is in common use. We're still humans, and working in a completely international environment I've found that two things make things clearer in terms of day/date.

    Using the more common DD/MM/YY format, and also using a 24 hour clock.

    logs being consistent? if I ever see that it's time to retire.
    Last edited by mike stenson; 02-12-2024 at 12:42 PM.
    ~mike

    happy in my mud hut

  15. #75
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    New Westminster BC
    Posts
    3,017
    Yeah, the date format can be confusing, I recall decades ago I was at customs in London Heathrow airport. When I presented my passport the agent wished me happy birthday, when I looked confused he said yeah you colonials use a different date format. The date was Nov 3rd and my birthday is March 11th. Maybe alpha numeric format is the way to go, much less chance for confusion.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •