Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 23

Thread: Input Please!!

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Lewiston, Maine
    Posts
    1,506

    Input Please!!

    I've been playing around with a HF, certainly with less than stellar success, and could use some critiques and opinions while it's not too late to make some changes.
    The HF is 2 1/8" tall x 7" diam. The finial is 2" in diam. @ the lowest point & 2 1/2" tall. Figured maple & cherry.
    I turned the tenon and shaped the bottom and reversed it, mounted it in the chuck. I wanted a cherry collar so I shaped the top, cut a 2 3/4" hole with a parting tool & hollowed out the form. Made a cherry plug & glued it on. Started to clean up the collar & found out how weak the bottom was, it took off flying, cussed a bit, scrathed my head, cussed a bit more, sat down with some coffee.
    I got the courage up to search for the flying saucer and found that other than the big-ass hole in the bottom it had survived fairly well. Decided to put a cherry collar in the bottom and it was a HF again. Made the finial and decided there was too much cherry in the bottom, so I tried a foot turned from maple, but I really hate it.
    I'd appreciate some thoughts on what you would do, i.e., toss the foot, is the finial proportional to the HF?, try to reshape the bottom?, etc.

    Thanks
    Attached Images Attached Images

  2. #2
    It looks good to me without the foot. The foot is way too small. If you are going to go this way, make the base about 2 - 2 1/4" in diameter and at least several inches tall. This guy needs lift! Or forget the foot and just leave it as is.
    David DeCristoforo

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    La Grange, IL
    Posts
    1,425
    Roland,

    Sorry to hear about your funnel experience. That is really a nice piece I like the shape, the top and the finial. Not crazy about the foot either. Don't really have any other suggestions other than make a taller pedestal for it. Model it after the finial. I would make it in the same wood as your bottom repair.

  4. #4
    I'd toss the foot, the rest looks great!

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Enid, Oklahoma
    Posts
    6,741
    Sorry to hear about the launch.

    The maple is beautiful, and I like the overall shape of the form... I do find the cherry bottom a little distracting. I think the finial could be a little taller and slimmer, but that's just my preference. One of the spiral finials posted recently might help balance the piece out visually.

    As for suggestions... Have you ever wanted to try dye? Coloring might make the maple pop even more which might lessen the visual impact of the cherry. Of course, if you color the maple, you might want to give the cherry some color, too.

    I'm interested to see what the others have to say.

  6. #6
    drop the foot, if you make it taller it will be bulkly if it is the same scale as final

    you made a good save and probably you will be the only one in the family that knows, artist perogative

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Fort Pierce, Florida
    Posts
    3,498
    I agree with what's been said so far. As to the finial, the stem should llook like the upper ball is pierced by a spear. By that I mean the curve coming in from the bottom should appear to continue through it, The top section is just a little heavy at its base, throwing the line off. Generally a good design and dying might really make it pop - just don't go overboard.
    Retired - when every day is Saturday (unless it's Sunday).

  8. #8
    Roland, as I state at the bottom of my posts "Success is The Sum of Failure and Learning", that said, this work has a number of things going for it. IMHO there is a feeling of being uplifted as I view this work. The form of the vessel and the matching uplift of the collar(Finial Base) add an uplifting strength that is projected. The gentle manor in which the grain presents itself on the vessel gives a complementing symmetry to accentuate that uplift. Your use of the woods you've chosen add to the overall beauty of this work. Personally, I prefer the base you show and would keep it. Great Job on a beautiful and powerful work.
    Last edited by Christopher K. Hartley; 12-02-2010 at 8:13 PM.
    Success is the sum of Failure and Learning

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Vadnais Heights, MN
    Posts
    1,607
    I like it without the foot. Just finish it and call it good!
    Doug Swanson

    Where are John Keeton and Steve Schlumpf anyway?

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Spring City, TN
    Posts
    1,537
    Drop the foot and all is well.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Harvey, Michigan
    Posts
    20,806
    This is a very interesting turning Roland! Lots of options...

    I like the basic form of your HF. The swept up lower curve adds lift to the piece but I also like the small foot as it elevates the piece just enough so that you can appreciate the entire lower curve. I do think the foot would work better if it were reversed but that is a judgment call on my part.

    The finial height works fine but I find it a little on the thick side and like Thom mentioned - the top element makes the piece top heavy. I would also like to see some of the elements of where the finial meets the HF (small up lifted edge) be repeated on the edge just above the donut shape. Feel it would help to tie all the elements together.

    Overall - very nice work! Keep at it!
    Steve

    “You never know what you got til it's gone!”
    Please don’t let that happen!
    Become a financial Contributor today!

  12. Foot is out of proportion.........that being said, if you took and inverted the foot with the small end on the bottom of the form, and put the big end of the foot at the bottom to stand the piece on, it would be better.

    I still needs some lift, and perhaps a less than skinny pedestal, but you have a great form here in my opinion, Roland. I like your idea, but just needs a little refinement.
    Remember, in a moments time, everything can change!

    Vision - not just seeing what is, but seeing what can be!




  13. #13
    I like the first pic just as it is. Although the foot adds some lift I don't think it adds anything overall and even draws the eye away from all the other nice features in the wood and the finial. The finial could be thinner, maybe taller, or both.

  14. #14
    I am with Curt on this one. I don't care for the foot at all, and the finial needs a little more height and less bulk - perhaps a little less going on, too.

    David's dye idea is a thought, as well. That curly maple will really pop with a little dye application - just need to experiment a little as it would be easy to clash against the cherry. I would want the curly maple the same color one could expect the cherry to end up - which won't take long.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Missouri
    Posts
    940
    Roland, what a save!! I would say either do away with the foot or, like Roger suggested, try inverting it. I'm not one for tall pedestals, especially with a shape like this. If you keep the foot I would stay with a short one like you have now, but larger in diameter on the bottom than the top. The more I look at the finial, the more I like it. Might be a little on the thick side, but not bad at all. The nice thing about finials is we can make another till we're happy. Easier to fix than a pedestal that's been glued on and a re-do is in order.(not that I have experienced that) I also don't like the dye idea. Some oil finish will pop that grain and darken the top and bottom for a nice contrast.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •