Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Type 9 variations

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Longview WA
    Posts
    27,347
    Blog Entries
    1

    Type 9 variations

    The type studies found online or in books are an interesting look into the history of Stanley hand planes.

    Often, they become rigid in their interpretation or use. Hand planes were not put out like a new year model of an automobile. Once a type study is put together, it gets distributed and becomes difficult to make changes.

    For my own enjoyment, I modify an old type study. But even that becomes inaccurate as some information is not entered or I may have multiple copies and forget which is the main copy. It is mostly just for fun.

    Here are variations in the type 9's evolution into the type 10.

    From all I can tell, they date from early type 9 to type 10 viewing from left to right. I suspect there are type 9s that look like the type 10 on the right, it is just that I do not have one, yet. The planes are a #4, #6, #5 and a #4. I almost threw my #5-1/2 in the picture, but it had a rib somewhat like the #6. Now I am going to have to go make sure it has the neck around the lateral lever.

    Plane Type.jpg

    Notice the notch at the bottom of the frog and how the rib in the notch goes from low, higher, then the rib has bosses on the side and finally the frog is necked to meet the bosses. The arrangement of the bosses on the rib and the necking of the notch make frog adjustment fairly easy on the Bailey style plane on type 10 and later. This started out with the type 9 to lessen the amount of metal under the frog to help increase the yields from the casting process. The old frog seat had a lot of metal that could cause warping when it was cooling.

    Also notice the changes at the top of the frog around the lateral lever. The first two have the cavity necked, the second two have the cavity open at the top.

    100_2268.jpg

    Finally, the first plane in this group is the only one to still have the 1888 patent date on the lateral lever. It is kind of hard to see on this one, it is a bit worn. Most of the type studies say that this patent date is not on the type 9s. If my memory is serving well, patent dates usually stayed on an item for 15 years. So this date was likely either because of left over parts or was removed in 1903. The blades for type 9 had the 1892 patent date. Type 10 is said to have began around 1907. There is a blade with just STANLEY stamped on it from this time period.

    Lot of room for speculation while lifting a brew with some plane toting friends.

    jim
    "A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty."
    - Sir Winston Churchill (1874-1965)

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Longview WA
    Posts
    27,347
    Blog Entries
    1

    Another variation

    Here is another variation on the type 9. This is a #5 kind of in the cross over between the necked lateral cavity yet still has the small notch.

    No patent date can be seen on the lateral lever.

    Picture 3.jpg

    jim
    "A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty."
    - Sir Winston Churchill (1874-1965)

  3. #3
    Hi Jim,

    I always take type studies with a grain of salt for several reasons, some of which you have already mentioned. I think they are good guide to give a rough idea of the age of a plane within 5-10 years, but I would be very suspicious of trying to nail it down closer than that. Among my prime objections is the fact that the type studies for Bailey planes are all based on the #4 which was, if not their best seller, then pretty close to the top. Different sizes (model numbers) sold at different rates, had many of their castings made by different and and often multiple suppliers, and therefore used up the various parts at varying rates. All this contributes to confusion on accurate dating. Baileys have somewhat of a mix and match character based on when a batch of parts was used up and those of a newer or different supplier phased in. As an aside, I wonder if anyone has ever done a comprehensive study of how well newer "type" parts are backward compatible for fit on the different planes.

    We always also have to take into consideration that Stanley was the 800 pound gorilla of their day in the tool market and was very tightly run in a manner similar to today's conglomerates which are managed and controlled by the bean counters. Stanley was always trying to both improve their product for competitive reasons and at the same time shave costs by simplifying secondary machining processes and lowering the weight of their castings.

    I found your pictures really interesting though and they are a wonderful example of how often suble changes occur in a short period of time.

    Thanks for posting it.
    Dave Anderson

    Chester, NH

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Longview WA
    Posts
    27,347
    Blog Entries
    1
    Dave, you are welcome, I am having fun doing this, it is like a kid with some new toys.

    Thank you for offering a very clear explanation on why these variations naturally occur in the manufacturing process.

    There are bound to be a few more finds in this. The type studies were also originally put together before the internet had the reach and resources we enjoy today.

    As far as accurate dating, the only way that could be done properly is if there was a log of what came off the line at the Stanley facilities. Even that would likely be prone to some errors.

    jim
    "A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty."
    - Sir Winston Churchill (1874-1965)

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Longview WA
    Posts
    27,347
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by Dave Anderson NH View Post
    Among my prime objections is the fact that the type studies for Bailey planes are all based on the #4 which was, if not their best seller, then pretty close to the top. Different sizes (model numbers) sold at different rates, had many of their castings made by different and and often multiple suppliers, and therefore used up the various parts at varying rates.
    Patrick Leach says something to this effect about the #2 makers being off in a world all of their own.

    jim
    "A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty."
    - Sir Winston Churchill (1874-1965)

  6. #6
    As far as the "Early" Type 9's, can the "Later" Type 9 frog be used on it? Or perhaps even a Type 10 frog? I have an "Early" Type 9 with a frog that is broken right below the Lateral Adjustment Lever. Looking for a salvageable frog for it. Thanks.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Longview WA
    Posts
    27,347
    Blog Entries
    1
    Howdy Adolf and welcome to the Creek.

    My guess is a later frog would likely work on an early type 9 casting, though not the other way around. It is something that hasn't been tested with any of my planes.

    jtk
    "A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty."
    - Sir Winston Churchill (1874-1965)

  8. #8
    Hold up here fellers; and bear with me if this question is glaringly ignorant.
    Are you saying that the Type Studies cover a range of different planes rather than
    having Type Studies #1-whatever which are distinct and unique to each Plane?
    If this is the case; Would I be correct in guessing that this situation holds true for the
    Bailey Nos. 1-8 with a separate set of Type Studies for say the #113 Compass Plane
    or a No. 35 transitional?

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    2,534
    John Walter's 2nd Edition (885 pages) covers a type study of all Stanley Planes.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Dickinson, Texas
    Posts
    7,655
    Blog Entries
    1
    How many encyclopedias have been written about Stanley planes?
    I have nine planes including a 604, 605, and 607 Bedrocks.

    If you have a rust bucket plane to clean up, black automotive paint works well.
    It looks a lot like japanning.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Longview WA
    Posts
    27,347
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by Stewie Simpson View Post
    John Walter's 2nd Edition (885 pages) covers a type study of all Stanley Planes.
    And if you hurry you may be able to get a beat up copy for less than $100 on that auction site.

    jtk
    "A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty."
    - Sir Winston Churchill (1874-1965)

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •