Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Photos too large for photo engrave

  1. #1

    Photos too large for photo engrave

    I want to engrave a set of tiles that total to a size of 4'x4'. Photo engrave will not load the pictures, im not sure the exact error message but basically the file size is too large. I wanted to just break up the picture into individual 6"x6" squares and process each one but after i ran two like this i noticed that there was a shade difference. I think that photo engrave brightens or darkens based on the overall color of the photo its working on and each 6"x6" tile was a bit diferent. Either way, my employer thinks we can do something to the computer to make photoengrave handle these larger format photos. Such as more ram, or a new video card. Is this possible, or is it a issue with the time out period of the program? Does anyone out there have a solution for this?
    Kern 150wat HSE 50x52 table.

  2. #2
    From photograv support re phograv 3

    "The current maximum file size limit is around 60 to 100 Mbytes uncompressed. This corresponds to an image size of around 10 to 12 megapixels.

    The only options that we can suggest currently for images larger than this is to see if PhotoGrav version 2.11 can process the large image or reduce the dpi (if possible) or divide the image at appropriate places (if possible"

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Glenelg, MD
    Posts
    12,256
    Blog Entries
    1
    Try to split the photo down the middle, either horizontally or vertically, so that each half has a similar histogram (if this is even possible with the photo). That will help mitigate the difference in brightness.

    For example, if it's an outdoor scene with ground on the bottom and sky at the top, split it down the middle from top to bottom... if you have roughly equal parts sky and ground in both pieces, it should help.
    Hi-Tec Designs, LLC -- Owner (and self-proclaimed LED guru )

    Trotec 80W Speedy 300 laser w/everything
    CAMaster Stinger CNC (25" x 36" x 5")
    USCutter 24" LaserPoint Vinyl Cutter
    Jet JWBS-18QT-3 18", 3HP bandsaw
    Robust Beauty 25"x52" wood lathe w/everything
    Jet BD-920W 9"x20" metal lathe
    Delta 18-900L 18" drill press

    Flame Polisher (ooooh, FIRE!)
    Freeware: InkScape, Paint.NET, DoubleCAD XT
    Paidware: Wacom Intuos4 (Large), CorelDRAW X5

  4. #4
    I see you have a Kern Laser, you might check with them.

    They sell large format lasers and may be able to help you
    with it.

    Just a thought

    Marty
    Martin Boekers

    1 - Epilog Radius 25watt laser 1998
    1 - Epilog Legend EXT36 75watt laser 2005
    1 - Epilog Legend EXT36 75watt laser 2007
    1 - Epilog Fusion M2 32 120watt laser with camera 2015
    2 - Geo Knight K20S 16x20 Heat Press
    Geo Knight K Mug Press,
    Ricoh GX-7000 Dye Sub Printer
    Zerox Phaser 6360 Laser Printer
    numerous other tools and implements
    of distruction/distraction!

  5. #5
    Thanks Dan, that worked great. Histogram huh, didnt know what to call that. I did talk to kern and they told me windows couldnt processes an image that large. This didnt seem right to me, thats why i was asking here. Well project is done now, and i learned something for the future, i also have a new word of the day. My co-workers have been useing it as an insult for past 15 min or so.
    Kern 150wat HSE 50x52 table.

  6. #6
    I have spoken to Photgrav several times regarding this problem. They say they will look at the problem sometime in the future...possibly. Version 2.11 will handle a little larger file than 3.0 but overall, very limiting when it comes to large images. The Gold method is the work around of choice. Separately, if you want do it in chunks, you can turn off all the enhance/adjustment features in Photgrav by clicking on the green dot in each window. If you do this you will need to make the necessary image adjustments in your file editing program such as Photoshop.
    Jack

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Innisfil Ontario Canada
    Posts
    4,019
    I'm not sure what the dpi of the original file was, but you could probably re-sample down to 150, then etch that at 300 to take advantage of the more beam overlap. I doubt very much you would see the difference at the distance you would normally view a 4' x 4' image at..
    Epilog 24TT(somewhere between 35-45 watts), CorelX4, Photograv(the old one, it works!), HotStamping, Pantograph, Vulcanizer, PolymerPlatemaker, Sandblasting Cabinet, and a 30 year collection of Assorted 'Junque'

    Every time you make a typo, the errorists win

    I Have to think outside the box.. I don't fit in it anymore


    Experience is a wonderful thing.
    It enables you to recognize a mistake when you make it again.


    Every silver lining has a cloud around it




Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •