PDA

View Full Version : Weekly Woodturning Photography Tips 1 & 2



Brian Brown
05-10-2007, 12:10 PM
Several forum members indicated interest my photographic tips, so here goes. I will try to post these tips as my work schedule permits, approximately weekly. To get on the same schedule as the other forum these are posted to, I will post the first two this week. When I can I will post pictures to help illustrate the topic. What I write here refers specifically to digital images, but most everything I suggest in these posts is applicable to film images as well. Film is not dead…just on life support. I have been a commercial photographer for 20 years but I am certainly not the end all authority on the subject. These tips are certainly not the only way to do things, but are techniques that seem to work under most circumstances. I have tried to simplify things as much as possible so that specialized and expensive equipment is not necessary. Everything I describe here should be readily available at fabric stores and hardware stores for a minimum expense, and I’ll try to give the anticipated cost where applicable. Sometimes I forget and use terminology that only a photographer would understand. Feel free to reply asking for a definition or clarification if necessary. I am not a software guru, and really only use one image editing package (Adobe Photoshop), so I don’t have any advice or answers to software or image manipulation related issues. I use real computers; Macintosh for those who don’t know (Ouch, just got myself in real trouble didn’t I?). For this reason I don’t know much about the bazillions of Windows compatible products available. Please Please Please someone else who is familiar with software volunteer to take this job. I am a firm believer that an image should be shot correctly in the first place so I can go home to make a pile of sawdust instead of fooling around with an image for hours on end trying to fix with a computer what I should have done right in the first place.

My objective in posting these tips is to help wood turners prepare quality images to use for juried shows, and in some cases for web pages or printed pieces. These tips will help with images for all purposes, but are primarily intended to create better quality images for jury presentation. During my career I have shot many thousand juried show images for artists working in dozens of media. I hope I have learned something about the process, and what it takes to get selected for a show. In a few cases, the requirements for the show may conflict with my advice. If this is the case, obviously you should follow the show rules. It is really tragic when the artists work is worthy of acceptance but the image submission quality caused the work not to be reviewed. Because of the number of juried shows I have worked with, I have determined some of the most common problems that keep an artist from being accepted into a show.

Some of the specifics I will cover are:
Exposure
Focus
Lens choice
Lighting
Backgrounds
Angle of view
File formats, and why image quality suffers with some

If anyone has other areas of interest or specific questions, please let me know, and I’ll do my best to address them. If I’m too much of a windbag, you’re sick of me wasting forum space, or this is too far off topic, just say so, and I’ll stop.

So enough of this Blah Blah, let’s start with the most obvious tip. Read your camera manual. This may seem oversimplified, or sarcastic, but I assure you it is not. It gives lots of information about using the camera, and how to find and set certain helpful functions. A manufacturer often uses the same software and functions for inexpensive consumer cameras as those that are used in their professional cameras. It is just harder to access. The manual will often give specific examples that make certain setups much easier. It will also define terms I will use in future posts, and most importantly it will help you navigate the deep menu items that can be so hard to find. Such items as manual flash settings, jpeg quality, manual ISO settings, exposure modes, and exposure compensation will all be helpful for the upcoming tips. OK, so it seems like such a simple tip to read the book. But, it is important. If you have lost your manual, most are available on the web in PDF format at the manufacturers website. There are so many camera models out there, I simply cannot try to explain where to find settings in them all. Next time I will tackle exposure problems. Pardon me now while I go read my camera manual.



Week 2

Proper Exposure

If you are having difficulty getting correct or consistent exposures in your pictures (images too light or too dark), here are some ideas that may help. Camera meters are designed to create a correct exposure from an average scene. An average scene is one where there are equal amounts of dark and light toned areas. When this situation occurs, modern cameras do an excellent job of creating a correct exposure. If a scene consists of predominately light areas or primarily dark areas, these scenes will fool the camera, yielding a poor exposure. For example, if a scene is mostly light areas like a light toned bowl on white, the camera will think there is more light than there really is, and give you an image that is too dark. If the scene is predominately dark areas, like a darkish vase on a black background, the camera will think there is not enough light and make the image too light. So how do you fix this? Here are 5 ways to do this.

1. Move closer to your subject to make the subject portion of your scene approximately equal (percentage wise) to the background portion of your scene. Now if you have a light bowl on a dark background with each occupying about 50% of the scene, you have a nearly average scene. Light doesn’t overpower dark, and vise versa. By moving in close, you’ll get the added benefit of seeing the details of your wood project rather than a boring background. Your camera may have a close up feature some where in it’s menu. Activating this setting may be necessary for you to move in and focus closer. Remember that “read the manual” thing from last week?

2. Change your background to a medium tone background. If you can’t do a close-up and the background occupies a large amount of real estate in your image, a medium toned background is an average between light and dark. Your camera will now do a better job of exposing your image correctly.

3. Your camera may have an exposure compensation feature. It usually looks like +/-. Or some variation with the + and – symbols. This feature works only if you are using an automatic exposure mode on your camera, such as Auto, Program, etc. It does not work in manual exposure mode. If using an automatic exposure mode, professionals use this feature constantly when they encounter a non average scene that is going to throw the camera off. It is not difficult to use this feature. If your images are always too dark, you will adjust to the + side. If the images are always too light, adjust to the – side. Read your manual to see how to use this. Every camera will be a bit different in how to access this feature, and to what degree it will allow adjustment. This method requires some trial and error to determine exactly what degree of compensation is necessary. But we are supposed to spend our time making sawdust instead of pictures, right? The good news is that once you have determined how much compensation to use, as long as you use the same background, and the same lighting setup every time, the amount of exposure compensation should never change.

4. Be careful about light sources in the area where you are working if they are not intended to light your subject. For example, a window behind or to the side of your subject, can severely affect the cameras ability to correctly measure the light. If you can see these lights in your viewfinder, they can have a tremendous effect on the exposure. Even if you can’t see these light sources through your viewfinder, they can still have an effect on your exposure. In addition to the exposure problems, these lights will usually cause a lens flare. A lens flare can appear as a light area often in one corner, colorful circular "UFO’s" alone or in a linear pattern, or most commonly, a low contrast or milky looking image. None of these effects will help your images.

5. When a scene challenges your cameras abilities, a good solution is to bracket your exposures. Some professional photographers refer to this as the WAG method of exposure (wild a** guess) however bracketing is not guessing. It is a method to obtain insurance exposures (over and under exposed, relative to the exposure chosen by your camera). Bracketing is a simple procedure if you are using your camera in manual exposure mode. Take one image at the exposure recommended by the camera, then adjust the shutter speed one step up from the recommended exposure and take a second image. Set the shutter speed to one step down from the recommended exposure and take a third image. If you want to be more precise, most modern cameras allow exposure increments in 1/2 or 1/3 steps. Now you have at least 3 image exposures to choose from.

It is only slightly more difficult with an automatic exposure camera. Take one picture using the exposure chosen by your camera. Then to bracket your exposure, fool your camera by adjusting the exposure compensation (+/-) by one step + and taking a picture. Then change to one step - and take another picture. Again, you now have three pictures all exposed differently. Simply choose the one you like best, and discard the others. This process can also be done in 1/2 or 1/3 steps. If necessary, you can use a bracketing range of as much as ± 2 steps.

Remember, digital images are much less costly than film images, and you are out very little by taking more pictures. Practice makes perfect. Just like your wood working skills were developed over a period of time, your picture skills will be developed (pun intended) the same way. I hope this is helpful.

Brian

Raymond Overman
05-10-2007, 12:58 PM
On your 5th point Brian, going back and reading the manual may show that you have an automatic bracketing feature on your camera so it takes 3 shots each time automatically. I have this on my Nikon D50 and use it to make sure I get the correct exposures.

Good information by the way Brian. Keep it coming and thanks.

John Hulett
05-10-2007, 1:24 PM
Nice job, Brian. Not too assuming... Right down the middle. Folks can benefit from your experience. Might be better in the Off Topic or Support forums, but a worthy series.

Personally, I'd like to see your take on white balance in future, more advanced installments.

- John

Bill Wyko
05-10-2007, 1:41 PM
So if my picture looks like this, what am I doing wrong?:)

Paul Engle
05-10-2007, 1:51 PM
uh , the thing belongs on my mantle , dats whats wrong...:eek: :D

Brian Brown
05-10-2007, 2:23 PM
Bill,

I agree with Paul Engle, Id like to have that piece on my mantle. As for what your doing wrong, I assume that the light colored wood is maple or holly, and you are taking this picture with incandescent lighting (light bulbs like in your house fixtures...picture Thomas Edison standing over a glass globe with a burning filament). . If that's the case, the orange color (photographers refer to it as red) color would most likely go away by changing your white balance. Film users change to a tungsten balance film, very hard to find. Change the white balance to...(here are the differences in all the camera models so look at your manual) an incandescent white balance. This may show up as a 3200 K, 3400 K, a picture of a light bulb with rays around it (when did we all forget how to read?) or any number of other ways to denote the color balance. Your manual will tell you. This may not be the perfect solution, but should be very close. Stay tuned, next week, white balance and the start to lighting.

Brian

Brian Brown
05-10-2007, 2:31 PM
On your 5th point Brian, going back and reading the manual may show that you have an automatic bracketing feature on your camera so it takes 3 shots each time automatically. I have this on my Nikon D50 and use it to make sure I get the correct exposures.

Good information by the way Brian. Keep it coming and thanks.
Raymond,

You make a good point about the auto bracketing. Your camera is a lot more advanced than some, but even some of the inexpensive point and shoots may have this feature. My cameras all have it, but I never use it because if I forget to turn it off, it really can make a mess. The less buttons on a camera, the harder the feature is to find in the menu, but if you need this feature, it is worth looking for.

Brian

Bill Wyko
05-10-2007, 2:57 PM
I'm using a Cannon EOS-20 if that helps. The lighting is what came with the photo tent which is l.e.d.'s but I had the florecent garage lights on too. When I finish my new shop I'm going to try to build an area just for photography. BTW Thanks for offering your knowledge in this field. It can really make or break the look of a piece.

Brian Brown
05-10-2007, 4:07 PM
Bill,

I'm not sure what to tell you. Most LED lights with photo tents are daylight balanced. Use the sun picture or as close as you can set the camera to 5500K white balance. It is possible the camera is getting confused if the white balance is set to auto. You can bracket your white balance just like you do your exposure. Just take one image with each white balance, and see which one works best with your lights. Post a picture of your set up, including one way back, so I can see what else may be influencing the color.

Brian

Steve Schlumpf
05-10-2007, 4:33 PM
Thank you for all the info Brian! I look forward to your next segment as I have a lot to learn about photos!

Bill Wyko
05-10-2007, 4:46 PM
I'll have to wait until I get the new shop built. When I tore down the old shed everything had to go into my previous work area. I sure appreciate any advice you can offer. Thanks again.

Patrick Taylor
05-10-2007, 5:15 PM
I think this is a fantastic addition to the forum! Thanks for taking the time to share your knowledge.

Philip Duffy
05-10-2007, 6:20 PM
OK, Brian, but what about the fact that the piece is a vertical presentation and the picture is oriented horizontally? It would seem to me that the crop should cut off the sides of the picture. True? What if he just shot the pic with the camera rotated to the vertical? - -just a thought or 2. Phil

Brian Brown
05-10-2007, 6:54 PM
Phillip,

You are right about the camera orientation in Bill's picture. Turning the camera might help the image immensely, but some (not all) jurried shows require the entries to be horizontal only. This is so that the images can be projected with the maximim size for detail, without the worry of the top or bottom being cut off. If it is not for a jurried show, then by all means turn the camera. If it is for a jurried show, then follow the submission rules of the show, or they are likely to disqualify your entry.

Brian

Bernie Weishapl
05-10-2007, 7:15 PM
Thanks Brian. I appreciate the info. Keep it coming.

Bill Huber
05-10-2007, 10:50 PM
I put this together a few years ago for doing macro work and have had many people make them of the last few year. get very good comments on it.

Its not a big thing but it could be made larger if needed.


The complete gallery of how to.

http://www.pbase.com/wlhuber/light_box_light_tent

Vic Damone
05-11-2007, 3:17 AM
Brian thanks for giving your time.

Some years back I needed to take very detailed photographs of a prototype product and someone suggested I set the shot up, tripod the film camera, turn out all the lights (total darkness), open the lens, and pop the strobe from many different angles. The results were amazing. Can this technique be done with a digital camera.

Vic

Jamie Donaldson
05-11-2007, 11:50 AM
... that can be made to improve your vessel image. The dark background robs light and reduces the amount of shadow detail we would like to see. Multiple light sources create multiple problem highlights, resulting in the "headlights" on this example. Using a single light source with bounce boards gives much more control over both highlights and shadows, and this technique is illustrated in the Phrugal Photo tutorial posted here onsight.

Brian Brown
05-11-2007, 1:25 PM
Vic,

The technique you are referring to is sometimes called painting with light, and can be a very successful technique. I used to use it all the time with film, and it made life much easier. If you view my website www.brownforimages.com, in the food section, bottom row, center, the image of the fruit on the table was done entirely with this technique. I have done whole building exteriors, and still do most interior spaces this way. This technique is absolutely magic for fixing shadow problems, and those bright spots from light reflections, and best of all, it is dirt cheap.

In theory it will work fine with digital images (I have tried it with marginal success), but there are some problems. The biggest problem with it was determining the proper exposure. I have heard all kinds of methods to calculate it, but “Guess and Test” works best. You also have to be very consistent in your flashes and angles. In order to do this technique, you need to leave the shutter open for an extended period of time. When the light (photons) enters the camera, it hits the sensor chip, and is converted to electrons in each of the millions of photosites (pixels) on the chip. The more electrons that strike a single photosite, the brighter that pixel will be in the final image. On a digital sensor, when power is applied to the chip, it begins to heat up. As the chip heats, random electrons are generated. These random electrons "pollute" the good electrons from the photons coming in. This creates what we refer to as noise. This noise manifests it self as colored graininess or static snowiness like on a TV. The more noise, the poorer the quality of the image. This problem is usually worst in the shadows. The longer the shutter is open, the warmer the chip gets and the worse the noise becomes. (This is a penny explanation of a thousand dollar technical issue.) Newer cameras are getting better at fixing this problem all the time. My first digital camera (1992) was horrible at any shutter speed longer than 1/30 sec. My newest camera (2005) does well at 8 sec, and I have even pushed to 30 sec, although it starts becoming a problem. So the short answer to your question, is do it , but do it quickly. How much image degradation an individual can tolerate is a subjective matter. So try it, and if the results are acceptable, then it is a great technique. However if you find the darker areas of the image are looking grainy, have bad color, or have an overall muddy look, it's time to try something else. I thought about including this technique as on of my tips, but the explanation is very involved. Maybe I’ll tack it on at the end. I hope this helps.

Brian

John-Paul Murphy
12-31-2007, 5:53 PM
Hi Brian
thought I would bump the topic to see if you had anything new
thanks
John-Paul

robert hainstock
12-31-2007, 8:36 PM
Thank you very much. :)
Bob

Pat Salter
12-31-2007, 8:57 PM
another sugguestion from someone who has no idea what he's talking about (and has his wifes permission to say so) would be to take notes. What lights, what ISO, what appature (?) setting, what speed, how far from camera lens to object, anything else that might effect it.
I only shoot about once every two months and i will forget if I don't write it down.

Bill Huber
12-31-2007, 9:04 PM
another sugguestion from someone who has no idea what he's talking about (and has his wifes permission to say so) would be to take notes. What lights, what ISO, what appature (?) setting, what speed, how far from camera lens to object, anything else that might effect it.
I only shoot about once every two months and i will forget if I don't write it down.

If you are shooting digital then 99% of that information is in the EXIF data with each image.

Brian Brown
01-05-2008, 9:26 AM
In a few days, I'll try to add some new information to this thread. This is clean it up, and throw it out week at work... kind of a spruce it up for the new year time. SWMBO keeps me very busy doing this. When I get a minute to breathe, I am going to consolidate the previous tips, and add some new information.

Brian

Chris Fierro
01-05-2008, 10:03 AM
I have no affiliation with this website, but I can strongly recommend it:

http://strobist.blogspot.com/

Lots of stuff on photography solutions from a pro--often with a low-cost / DIY approach.

Ben Gastfriend
01-05-2008, 11:27 AM
Thanks for the insight! I have to find the bracketing feature on my digital camera, I know it's in there somewhere. I do that on the SLR 35mm and it ensures that you get a good exposure each time.