PDA

View Full Version : Renovating an Infill Shoulder Plane



Derek Cohen
01-20-2007, 8:45 PM
Renovating an Infill Shoulder Plane


A few years ago I bought an infill shoulder plane that was advertised on an Internet site as a Norris. It certainly had the lines of a Norris, and it was cheap enough to take a chance. Well, it duly arrived, and it turned out to be shop-made.

Who ever made it – there was no manufacturers name or any identification, other than the single word “steel” printed on the front lip – certainly knew his stuff. The shoulder plane was beautifully dovetailed, the (Mahogany?) infill a perfect fit, the mouth was small and the sides were square. Someone suggested it might be a Slater. Anything is possible – Slater certainly made planes under different disguises, however there usually was some inscribed information that it was one of his. This plane had nothing, nada, zip.


http://i13.photobucket.com/albums/a262/Derek50/Restoration/Infill%20shoulder%20plane/IMG_2294a.jpg

There were a few negative features – such as the pitting, poorly fitted screws (as if someone had replaced them at some stage (which might suggest that the infill had been replaced as well), the wedge was quite chewed up, and the iron was short.

http://i13.photobucket.com/albums/a262/Derek50/Restoration/Infill%20shoulder%20plane/IMG_2293a.jpg

It was the short iron that bothered me the most since this made it very difficult to adjust for projection. The iron’s blade was a little over 30mm (1 ¼”), which is a reasonable length. It was a thick 3/16”. The problem lay with the stalk, which was short by about 75mm (3”).


http://i13.photobucket.com/albums/a262/Derek50/Restoration/Infill%20shoulder%20plane/IMG_2291a.jpg

I spent some time checking out the prices of a replacement, but this was actually more than the price I paid for the plane! So I put it off and just made do. With a sharp iron, this shoulder plane performed very well.

I also liked the size: 30mm (1 ¼”) wide, 201m (8”) long, and 65mm (2 ½”) high at the center. It had heft and authority.

So time went by, and finally I decided to do something about that iron….

Repairing the iron

The solution was simply to lengthen the stalk. Unfortunately I do not own a welder. So I decided to rivet on an extra piece. Also, while I was about it, I thought that I would create a snecked rear end.

The first step was to cut and roughly shape a length of mild steel (taken from an offcut of angle section).

A lap joint was then ground and filed and sanded onto both the stalk and the extension.


http://i13.photobucket.com/albums/a262/Derek50/Restoration/Infill%20shoulder%20plane/Makingtheextensioncombo.jpg

The tools I used were very basic: files, small angle grinder, disk sander and belt sander combo.

The plan now was to add to join the two pieces with rivets. I had some 5mm brass rod that should work. So the first step was to drill a 5mm hole in each piece, then chamfer the inside for the rivet.

http://i13.photobucket.com/albums/a262/Derek50/Restoration/Infill%20shoulder%20plane/IMG_2346a.jpg


A small piece of the brass rod was cut ….

http://i13.photobucket.com/albums/a262/Derek50/Restoration/Infill%20shoulder%20plane/IMG_2353a.jpg


….. and the end peined.

http://i13.photobucket.com/albums/a262/Derek50/Restoration/Infill%20shoulder%20plane/IMG_2354a.jpg

This was placed in the holes, trimmed shorted, then peined to complete the rivet at one end.

http://i13.photobucket.com/albums/a262/Derek50/Restoration/Infill%20shoulder%20plane/IMG_2359a.jpg

Before the other side could be done, the rivet first had to be filed flush. Then the procedure was repeated for the second hole.

http://i13.photobucket.com/albums/a262/Derek50/Restoration/Infill%20shoulder%20plane/IMG_2362a.jpg


A little filing and smoothing with a deburring wheel, and it came up really well.

Cosmetics

I trust what follows does not upset anyone. The plane is an unknown make but well made. I felt that it would be respectful to the maker to try and return it to a state in which it might also be appreciated for its looks.

While the pitting of the steel body did not affect its performance, the walls were not flat – in places they curved inward very slightly. I decided to lap the sides until they were flat, which would also take care of the pitting.

The sole was left as-is as this was flat. The pitting was minimal, with the steel only discoloured.

http://i13.photobucket.com/albums/a262/Derek50/Restoration/Infill%20shoulder%20plane/Mouth.jpg

Initially I planned to replace the screws with fresh steel screws and then file these flush with the body, thereby enabling them to disappear. However I discovered that the ones I had were too narrow and so used some brass ones that were the correct size. I had done this before with a Spiers smoother and liked the effect.

Lapping was done (less screws and less iron) on a belt sander, beginning with 80 grit and working through to 240 grit. At this point the screws were replaced, ground down flush with the body, and the lapping recommenced with 240 and then 400 grit belts.

The chips on the wedge were sanded out. This did not alter the dimensions. All other wood was just cleaned as I wanted to retain as much of the patina as possible. While this was removed on the wedge, polishing with a mix of shellac and waxes created a very close colouring. I am confident that the wedge will quickly regain patina through use.

(continued in Part 2)

Derek Cohen
01-20-2007, 8:46 PM
The finished plane

The end result looks like this:

http://i13.photobucket.com/albums/a262/Derek50/Restoration/Infill%20shoulder%20plane/IMG_2378a.jpg

http://i13.photobucket.com/albums/a262/Derek50/Restoration/Infill%20shoulder%20plane/IMG_2397a.jpg

http://i13.photobucket.com/albums/a262/Derek50/Restoration/Infill%20shoulder%20plane/IMG_2391a.jpg

Regards from Perth

Derek

Jim Becker
01-20-2007, 9:06 PM
Very instructive, Derek!

Ryan Cathey
01-20-2007, 9:53 PM
Very nice!! How much did that diamond in the rough cost you, if you don't mind me asking?

-Ryan C.

Derek Cohen
01-20-2007, 10:46 PM
Ryan

I can only guess as it was about 3 (or more) years ago. The vendor had the plane for sale on his website. Long spiel about it being a Norris, etc. Asking (I think) $60 and selling it behalf of another. At this price I could not lose since even No Name shoulder planes sold for more on eBay. When I received it I could now see the details more clearly, most especially the short iron which was almost unusable, and contacted the vendor that it was not a Norris, etc. He was terrific and asked if I wanted to return it for a full refund. I made an offer - and kept it along with a refund of about $25 or $30. So, long story at an end, it might have been about $30 (excluding shipping costs).

Regards from Perth

Derek

Jim Dunn
01-20-2007, 11:30 PM
Derek that's a beautiful job of restoring the plane, but I have a question. You said in the first post that the dovetails were just perfect. I don't see them at all. Where are they exactly?

Thanks Jim

Derek Cohen
01-20-2007, 11:42 PM
Derek that's a beautiful job of restoring the plane, but I have a question. You said in the first post that the dovetails were just perfect. I don't see them at all. Where are they exactly?

Thanks Jim

Jim

When steel-on-steel dovetail are perfect, there are no gaps and filing/sanding them flush makes their lines disappear. You can only see them if you look very carefully. This is a case where good work is not seen.

Regards from Perth

Derek

Ryan Cathey
01-21-2007, 1:35 AM
Wow!! Thats a nice price looking at it now! I've been looking for a shoulder plane since I first started collecting to no avail. Forgive me if I sounded rude earlier.

-Ryan C.

Tom Sontag
01-21-2007, 1:52 AM
Nicely done and told Derek. Put me solidly in the camp of polishing up users to look good; I like the effect.

I do not own any infill shoulders so please tell me about the new iron length. I take it the "snecked rear end" gives you something to tap against to move the iron out and up a bit. Does it need to stick out that far? Does sticking out that far get in the way of your hands at all?

Other than stability, mahogany strikes me as a curious infill choice. Maybe it was used a lot, I don't know, but I always thought mass was an important criteria.

It's a real beauty.

Dave Anderson NH
01-21-2007, 8:11 AM
Nicely done Derek. Personally, I see nothing wrong with rehabbing a plane which doesn't have a reliable provenance. It lacks collector value so it isn't depriving anyone of a chance to add to their collection. I particularly like your solution to the short iron problem. It is innovative and has potential use for many other folks with the same difficulty. Thanks for posting.

John Schreiber
01-21-2007, 11:07 AM
Nice work and a beautiful outcome. Shaping that plane blade and its extension for riveting must have been a tough job. It looks great, but I think I would have taken it to a welder.

Russ Massery
01-21-2007, 11:56 AM
Thanks, Derek. Very informative.

Ryan Cathey
01-22-2007, 7:19 PM
Anyone ever wonder how people will react when they find some of Derek's tools in a flea market or antique store many years from now. Maybe(since I'm probably the youngest member) I'll be able to set some young whippersnapper straight at the age of 98 or so; I'll just smile and say "Naw, that ain't no custom factory made job 'ol Derek Cohen made that back when I was your age." Hehehe just a thought.

-Ryan C.

Ken Werner
01-22-2007, 8:47 PM
Hey Ryan,
Or maybe Derek's great grandson will videophone your granddaughter and compare his GGpa's shoulder plane with her Grandpa's.
;)
Beautiful work ol' Derek.

Bob Oehler
01-22-2007, 9:11 PM
Very nice restoration. Use it in good health

Bob Oehler

Derek Cohen
01-22-2007, 11:17 PM
You guys are the end :)

Thanks.

Regards from Perth

Derek (the compulsive modifier)

Derek Cohen
01-23-2007, 10:03 AM
One more picture: here are the last three infill renovations-modifications I have done.

http://i13.photobucket.com/albums/a262/Derek50/Planes/Threeplanes2.jpg

Regards from Perth

Derek