Wes Billups
01-22-2022, 10:19 PM
So I've got a Steff 2034 CI power feeder which has belts instead of wheels. I don't use it much as I'm not a production shop but today I could not get the belts to grip the wood to pull it through the shaper.
I bought the shaper and feeder used 14 years ago and never replaced the belts as they are in very good shape still but I'm wondering if there is any option other than replacing to give them better grip. I've thought about trying to grind/sand the existing belts to give them a fresh surface in order to better grip the wood. Has anyone done this or tried belt dressing to give their belts better grip? I'd hate to have to spend the $180 ($60 per belt) to replace the three belts if there was a less expensive option for a hobbiest shop.
Another option I've thought about for years is to look into converting this feeder into a conventional wheel based feeder. It appears I can do this for about $60 ($20 per wheel). I've never felt like the belt feed was necessary for the type of work I do so would love to get some input by those more experienced in shaper and feeder operation than I.
Here is what I've got versus what I'm looking at:
472174 472175
Thanks,
Wes
I bought the shaper and feeder used 14 years ago and never replaced the belts as they are in very good shape still but I'm wondering if there is any option other than replacing to give them better grip. I've thought about trying to grind/sand the existing belts to give them a fresh surface in order to better grip the wood. Has anyone done this or tried belt dressing to give their belts better grip? I'd hate to have to spend the $180 ($60 per belt) to replace the three belts if there was a less expensive option for a hobbiest shop.
Another option I've thought about for years is to look into converting this feeder into a conventional wheel based feeder. It appears I can do this for about $60 ($20 per wheel). I've never felt like the belt feed was necessary for the type of work I do so would love to get some input by those more experienced in shaper and feeder operation than I.
Here is what I've got versus what I'm looking at:
472174 472175
Thanks,
Wes