PDA

View Full Version : MOPA fiber laser, where to start?!



Scott Watson84
05-07-2018, 11:20 AM
Hello all,

I run an engraving business for the last 25 years, we have been laser engraving for the last 15, in that time we have only ever used Trotec Speedy C02 machines. I have been toying with the idea of adding a fiber engraver to mark on stainless steel and clear anodized aluminum. I spoke to Trotec about a machine and they recommended a MOPA laser, they said it's the only way to get a black mark on these materials consistantly, I was quoted $55,000 for the machine, now being a Trotec user for the past 15 years I understand the value in their machines, However after checking with a few Chinese manufactures, There is a significant price difference,

Our use for the machine would be mostly to engrave on industrial tags and such, we currently use stainless steel with cermark, or use a black anodized aluminum. however we are getting more and more requests for aluminum tags with black text. Add to that, we don't have the ability to sheer stainless steel in house and rely on an outside vendor which at times have caused us to miss deadlines.

After doing quite a bit of reading online, including these forums, I'm still confused, is it correct that a MOPA laser is the way to go to get a nice consistent black mark on stainless and clear anodized aluminum? My idea is to purchase a well reviewed Chinese machine to test the waters, if I find that it is helpful to my business I can look at replacing it with a Trotec machine in the future.

Does anyone have any insight into the world of MOPA?

Kev Williams
05-07-2018, 12:56 PM
Best advice against buying a $55,000 Trotec Mopa is supplied by Trotec themselves:
Watch this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uJnufscnAMs

fast forward past the nonsense to the 3:20 mark and hit play... watch the machine in action. Looks like it's moving along pretty good-- that is, until he removes the plate from the machine, at which point you'll see how small the plate is compared to his hands... The Achilles Heel of Mopa lasers is, doing colors is excruciatingly SLOW... Now, just as the timer hits the 3:49 mark, HIT PAUSE-- And give close scrutiny to, and this is my opinion, the light, inconsistent engraving.

I have 2 better ways to get black on aluminum, one of which may not work ;) ...

1st option: get some outdoor black aluminum from Johnson's, both sides are engraveable, it's intended to engrave to silver, but here I 'relief engraved' this, burnt off the entire plate, leaving black lettering:
385474
now, this isn't perfect because the silver is a little on the dark side because of the UV resistant coating, it more resembles SS than anodized aluminum. Took my 40w Gravograph exactly 1:02 to do this. I would wager the MOPA would take longer than that to engrave just the black. And anodized aluminum isn't particularly weather resistant, this stuff is!

2nd option, which I've been going to try but haven't yet-- Cermark engraving raw aluminum, which I do a lot of with my Triumph, THEN having it clear anodized after the engraving. What I'm not sure is, is if the Cermark will tolerate the anodizing process... but, I'm not sure why not either...

Anyway, I love Trotec machines, but I'm not a fan of MOPA fibers, and personally, I think the engraving in that video is atrocious-- I couldn't sell that to anyone...


.

Bert McMahan
05-07-2018, 6:07 PM
FYI on Youtube, you can move to a point in the video then right click on it and select "Copy URL at current time" to get this link:

https://youtu.be/uJnufscnAMs?t=200

that takes you right to 3:20 :)

Scott Watson84
05-07-2018, 8:36 PM
Thank you for the very informative reply! I have tried cermark on raw aluminum and gotten mixed results at best.

I like your idea of relief engraving the black aluminum, however I don't know how it would hold up in an industrial environment, which is where most of our tags end up, power plants, water treatment facilities, naval ships etc.

With a standard fiber laser, is it possible to engrave aluminum and stainless to a depth deep enough to allow paint filling? If so would the edges be smooth enough to allow easy clean up after the paint dries?

Kev Williams
05-07-2018, 11:59 PM
If you're willing to paint fill aluminum, just tool engrave it. It's faster and cleaner, much better suited for paint filling. And aside from aluminum AB, Cutler-Hammer etc legend plates, virtually all of my 'industrial environment' customers use stainless or Rowmark Lasermax. And for truly indestructible tags, Rowmark Ultramatte (or equivalent) is what your customers should buy from you... But there is a catch with Ultramatte, the top cap is so thick it must be tool engraved :)

That outdoor black is very good at repelling the weather, but it's not particularly scratch resistant... however, any acids that will attack these plates will likely attack raw and anodized aluminum too.

As to Cermarking aluminum, only my 80w Triumph will do this consistently, my 40w machines just plain won't, and fwiw 6061 is all I've ever used Cermark on... 70 series should work, but 50 series bleeds so badly I'm not sure Cermark will fuse to it...

Scott Watson84
05-08-2018, 9:02 AM
Thanks Kev.

Is it possible to get a nice black mark on stainless with a standard 30 watt Galvo fiber laser without the use of cermark or similar?

Bill George
05-08-2018, 9:33 AM
Thanks Kev.

Is it possible to get a nice black mark on stainless with a standard 30 watt Galvo fiber laser without the use of cermark or similar?

It depends on the stainless. Most of my marks are brown or dark brown. I just purchased something new and the markings on it were fiber lasered and brown. looked pretty nice. Have you asked your customer if they really want black or would the brown work?

Kev Williams
05-08-2018, 1:29 PM
Like Bill says, depends... I've hit on a nice annealing setting that gives me consistent results, which means consistent within a particular batch of material. Sometimes the mark is quite black, most times it's more of a dark gray, and there's always the 'hologram' effect, different lighting angles show a lighter mark, and sometimes in a variety of colors, like this plate- This is the same plate, just took pics at different angles. The first pic, you'd swear a MOPA did it, but the second pic reveals the truth ;)
385524385523

But the problem with annealing is, it's the same process as a MOPA getting colors: tight hatch fill, low power and slow speeds, emphasis on SLOWWWWW..

If you go the faster-hotter route with a fiber, as Bill says you usually get a brown charred/burnt mark, sometimes you get lucky and not so brown, sometimes you good results, always a crap shoot...
One of my marketing customers brings me these not cheap titanium bracelets that I Cermark engrave on the top sides. The insides come with the name and logo already fiber lasered ( WASN'T ME!! :D)
385522
The top bracelet is a satin finish, bottom is polished-
Top is annealed, and to the naked eye looks pretty good, but (ahem) it could be better ...
But the bottom has been hit hard and IMO, even though it's black, the char makes it look terrible, and it's worse to the naked eye...

As for the lucky times, a young guy brought me a handful of these SS bottle openers (groomsmen gifts),
385520385519
and I swear, this is NOT Cermark, my fiber did this! -- But I've never been able to quite duplicate it; this is as close as I've gotten:
385525
-this is thick-walled SS tube, top is fiber, bottom is Cermark. I think part of the reason it came out good is the material thickness was able to absorb much of the heat that chars thin stock. But even as good as it looks, it's dark brown, not black... I'm not sure what grade SS these are, or the bottle openers, could be that has something to do with it? But 99.9% of the stainless I engrave is 304 or 316...

Now this is an extreme case of all things fibering SS gone wrong! :D
-rotary wouldn't line up, and I kinda had the speed a bit too slow I think! SHOULD be black, but nope!
385527
not this extreme obviously, but this is typical of the color when fibering SS, brownish-grayish, not so black-ish...

Fibers are wonderful, but putting black markings on stainless nicely and quickly, not their suit. BRIGHT markings on stainless, oh yes :)
385526

--I've convinced several customers to try bright rather than black etching, most of them like it, but some will always want black!

Neville Stewart
05-08-2018, 10:49 PM
I’d have to differ on stainless. I haven’t found any I can’t get a really good black mark with no surface marring and very quickly too. Id say about 20 seconds each on those openers.
385590385591385592

Kev Williams
05-09-2018, 2:30 AM
MOPA or the Raycus?

Darren Wilson
05-09-2018, 7:32 AM
Hello Scott,
MOPA will produce a beautiful black mark on anodised alumnium, such as iPad.

385609The marks are indistinguishable from the factory marks, and smooth to the touch. As far as I know they are durable as the anodised finish.

Darren Wilson
05-09-2018, 7:39 AM
I have found that making a black mark on anodised ali, is a very repeatable process. Color marking is another story, slightest change to the material will change the color of the mark. If you plan on marking materials provided by the customer you will have to take on a sacrificial sample to dial in settngs for color marks. Focus is critical and I have found that 254mm lens works best for me.

Scott Watson84
05-09-2018, 9:47 AM
Thanks for the info, I have no interest in colour marking, only in black.

Kev Williams
05-09-2018, 12:18 PM
interesting learning experience, need to experiment :)

Neville Stewart
05-09-2018, 9:53 PM
Q switch raycus

MOPA or the Raycus?

Neville Stewart
05-10-2018, 12:15 AM
Hi Scott, mind sharing your settings for black on Anodized?

Hello Scott,
MOPA will produce a beautiful black mark on anodised alumnium, such as iPad.

385609The marks are indistinguishable from the factory marks, and smooth to the touch. As far as I know they are durable as the anodised finish.

Darren Wilson
05-10-2018, 1:38 AM
Settings as follows:

160mm lens

2000S
25P
800kHz
4PW
.010 hatching

focus is slightly off 1/4 to 1/2 turn near

you may have to play around with s/p as your source is 50w to my 20w.

Have a crack and let me know how it works for you...

Rodne Gold
05-10-2018, 2:41 AM
55k is a horrendous price...you can get a 30w fibre door to door in 5-7 days for 10k or less...5k for a 20w ...

John Lifer
05-10-2018, 9:13 AM
I agree Rodney, I typed in a comment the other day and deleted as I tend to 'push' Chinese lasers a bit more than I might should, but my comment was to buy a 20 or 30 watt Chinese direct for less than 20% of his price quoted, use for a bit as a trial, and if it failed, sell for 95% of what he paid for it.

And no wonder my semi Mopa won't do black on Aluminum, I can only go to 400kHz..... not 800.

Neville Stewart
05-10-2018, 11:18 PM
4PW, waveform 4?

Settings as follows:

160mm lens

2000S
25P
800kHz
4PW
.010 hatching

focus is slightly off 1/4 to 1/2 turn near

you may have to play around with s/p as your source is 50w to my 20w.

Have a crack and let me know how it works for you...

Eric Sooy
05-12-2018, 6:11 AM
I have an XT Laser Mopa laser engraver, 20W that comes from China. Excellent machine and the transaction went very smoothly. I highly recommend this company. In fact I am waiting on delivery of a C02 laser from them. If you go to alibaba.com and search for XT Laser you can find them. Let me know if you have any questions. No I'm not a sales guy, just a happy customer and new member of Sawmill Creek.

Jeff Watkins
05-12-2018, 2:00 PM
4PW, waveform 4?

@Neville MOPA lasers have adjustable pulse width in Nano Seconds. So his 4PW setting would be a Pulse Width of 4ns (Nano Seconds).

I have a JPT 30w MOPA (M6+-L series) and it's adjustable from 2-250ns pulse width, and a frequency range of 2-2000kHz. Different sources have different ranges, some SPI which will go to 500ns. It's in steps so not completely variable but it is adjustable. Q-Switches laser on the other hand have a fixed pulse width that ranges usually from 100-200 depending on the fiber source.

Neville Stewart
05-12-2018, 9:13 PM
Thanks Jeff. I’m using Scaps too so it has a little different nomenclature.
Your mopa range goes up to 2gig?

Darren Wilson
05-13-2018, 2:41 AM
Sorry Neville... what Jeff said.

My software is MAXMarking 2, looks like a cloned/stripped down EZCad. I don't have wave forms just a pulse width setting. Would love to have some type of conversion chart Waveform to PW if anyone out there has one...

Matthew Stellas
05-14-2018, 10:34 AM
I have an XT Laser Mopa laser engraver, 20W that comes from China. Excellent machine and the transaction went very smoothly. I highly recommend this company. In fact I am waiting on delivery of a C02 laser from them. If you go to alibaba.com and search for XT Laser you can find them. Let me know if you have any questions. No I'm not a sales guy, just a happy customer and new member of Sawmill Creek.

I recently purchased a 60W MOPA through Jason at XT Laser and could not be happier. I currently have a 300mm lens on it but need to swap in the 100mm to give some deep engraving a shot. They included a USB drive with screenshots of the settings for each lens, but I'm still a bit confused as to how to calibrate the red indicator laser. Hopefully I can mess with it a bit more this week, I'm just hesitant to make changes to something that currently works flawlessly.

John Lifer
05-14-2018, 11:45 AM
Assuming here you have an Internal LED through the lens and an external mounted on head (or close to it) that will intersect.
Internal isn't usually calibrated, you use Ruler to check height and move the external mount to make them line up.
If you have different system, I'll say contact XT Laser....

Jeff Watkins
05-16-2018, 2:44 PM
Sorry Neville... what Jeff said.

My software is MAXMarking 2, looks like a cloned/stripped down EZCad. I don't have wave forms just a pulse width setting. Would love to have some type of conversion chart Waveform to PW if anyone out there has one...

@Neville Yes, my RayFine JPT MOPA goes to 2000kHz. I did a lot of research before buying it. Not all of the fiber sources go that high, in fact most don't. There are things out in that range that will be nice to have but many people will never use. I did the JPT YDFLP-30-M6+-L because it has a higher mJ joule output than most other mopa of the same power. Mine is right at 1mj like most Q-switched of the same power and the majority of 30 watt mopa's I looked at were .5-.6mJ output. Be sure and ask for the fiber source being used and/or go directly to their website, JPT in my case, and get their specs to compare models. I ruled out a couple companies right out of the gate because they wouldn't supply the -L model I asked for.

Now... wait for it... I found a Waveform reference sheet. These waveform settings come from the StellarMark IFII and SPI series fiber literature. The SPI image doesn't give specific ns pulse width except in the graph, which isn't very useful, but it shows that they both use the same settings. It make me wonder if the StellarMark is using a SPI source. I think other companies using the Waveform nomenclature are using similar settings.

What users with Waveform settings can garner from this is that if I say I'm using a setting of 90 power, 30 khz, 250ns to deep engrave or cut metals, you would choose Waveform 0 which shows 35kHz and 250ns. Likewise if I say I'm Annealing at 25 power, 200khz, 13ns, you could choose the closest settings which would be Waveform 28 at 250khz 9ns. If you look at the 20HHS and 40HHS columns you'll notice there are some differences between the two sources but they are close enough to get you similar results. There are times that a several NS (nanosecond) difference will have a totally different effect so you still have to experiment but hopefully this will get you in the ballpark. My JPT source uses NanoSecond NS instead of Waveform and both NS and KHZ can be set separately. I can set any frequency between 2 to 2000kHz the NanoSecond value is a little different. Any NS value can be set but it defaults to the closest value of 2,4,6,9,13,25,35,45,60,80,100,150,200,250. If I set a value of 50ns I'm assuming it rolls back to 45, or whatever the closest value us.



385930 385931


Enjoy,

Neville Stewart
05-17-2018, 1:10 PM
Great info Jeff thank you. Do you have a website or FB page?

Darren Wilson
05-20-2018, 5:05 AM
@ Jeff...Thanks for the chart!!