PDA

View Full Version : What can I do to restore 2 Disston Tri-Squares?



Doug Hobkirk
04-21-2017, 7:14 PM
I would like to make these useful. I don't do much precise work - kitchen drawers or restoring a dresser are typical projects. How often do you use a tri-square?



Is there anything I can treat the metal with that would ever make the inch markings visible?
Is there any way to improve the wood and brass look? They are OK now, but they could look better.


Thanks!

I'm attacking my endless pile of "stuff." Each item seems to turn into another project These don't seem to have much value on eBay, so I figure I will just keep them to use in my workshop. Looking beautiful is good, being readable is good.

358653 358654 358655 358656

lowell holmes
04-21-2017, 7:18 PM
I would remove the grunge and polish them, wood and steel. I would start with steel wool. I personally think old tools look better polished rather than new varnish.

steven c newman
04-21-2017, 8:04 PM
There is a paste at a sporting goods store...Gun Blue Paste. I apply a layer to the metal, allow it to sit a bit, and wipe off the excess. Then some fine sandpaper on a flat block of wood, sand the metal down. Etches being lower than the surrounding steel will stay "blued". Numbers on a steel square can be the same.

As for the wood...usually it is a rosewood. Any finish applied to it, will turn it black.

lowell holmes
04-21-2017, 11:19 PM
That's why I said polish. Waxed is a better word.

george wilson
04-22-2017, 8:13 AM
I couldn't make out any markings. Are you sure they ever had any? Well,the lower one in pic.#1 sees to have some under the rust. My suggestion is to use a SQUARE JACK. Put the old square under the jack. Jack it up and pit a newer ,more legible square under it!!:)

lowell holmes
04-22-2017, 9:46 AM
I don't measure with squares, I square with squares. I measure with rulers. I use the extension on my 72" folding carpenter's rule.
I had a 96" rule at one time. I will look for another one.

I found one, but they want $30 for it. Oh Well:(

Pete Taran
04-22-2017, 10:29 AM
The #1 did indeed have markings, the #5 did not. Those are early squares, likely civil war era. The later #1s had a trifoil brass piece instead of the 4 way affair you have. I would take a sharp, new, single edge razor blade and work at it at an angle. Go at an angle to the markings or it will dig in and mar the razor blade edge and scratch the square. You should quickly see some marks emerge. You should also see Henry Disston in an arch on the blade on the side with the blade facing to the left as you hold the stock. Once you have all the rust off with the razor you can get, you can move to using some silicon carbide sand paper, a block and mineral spirits. I wouldn't get too ambitious with it. Its never going to look new, and trying to make it look new will likely destroy the square.

Having said all that, before you start, you may want to check to see if it's square with a reference square. If not, might be a big waste of time. There are ways you can tap the spot where it is fixed to the wood part of the stock to bring it into square, but, it's not easy and yields variable results.

Check it out and report back back with your progress.

Pete Taran
04-22-2017, 11:15 AM
What it looked like new. :)

358680358681

steven c newman
04-22-2017, 1:01 PM
And what Mine look like now..
358688
Large square is still readable....
358689
Right down to the patent date...
358690
Handle seems to be Rosewood...brass plate is held in place with screws
358691
Smaller one has no numbers ( and i have a smaller one, yet)
358692
Brass extension on the 72" folder Lufkin...
358693
Rosewood, and Brass, steel leg has a Made in USA stamp. This is the small one...there is a 12" one in the shop, as well.
358696
Yes, the shop has a marking knife...hand forged, by Super Dave Bardin....