Anyone upgrade 2-1/2" dust port on Performax 16/32 sander?

[Gene Takae]

Hello all,
I own an older Performax 16/32 sander with a 2-1/2" dust port. I was considering changing the port to a 4" to make better use of my DC. If anyone has done this I'd like to hear how you did yours.
Thanks,
Gene

[Scott Snyder]

try this
http://lumberjocks.com/kaetamer135/blog/39467

[Bob Falk]

I used a 4" hole saw to enlarge the opening in the plastic guard/dust cover. I then glued in a 4" plastic duct elbow with a gel superglue. worked good and was strong. improved dust collection significantly.
348007

[Mike Henderson]

You can purchase a port at places like Rockler or Woodcraft. Cut the hole bigger and then mount the port with some bolts and nuts.

Mike

[Gene Takae]

try this
http://lumberjocks.com/kaetamer135/blog/39467


Thanks Scott. Gee that guy didn't play around with his 6" port!

[Gene Takae]

I used a 4" hole saw to enlarge the opening in the plastic guard/dust cover. I then glued in a 4" plastic duct elbow with a gel superglue. worked good and was strong. improved dust collection significantly.
348007

Bob, I like the way you pointed the outlet to the side to keep the hose out of the way. Thanks!

[James Baker SD]

This is what I did with a Performax 44/22 dust port. Originally it was 4" and I did not find that adequate to capture dust with a DC. Bigger the better if connected to low pressure DC. This was a 7" cut in from Nordfab.

348044

[Gene Takae]

This is what I did with a Performax 44/22 dust port. Originally it was 4" and I did not find that adequate to capture dust with a DC. Bigger the better if connected to low pressure DC. This was a 7" cut in from Nordfab.

348044

James,
4" is adequate for me but I like the idea of using a tee like that.

[Gene Takae]

You can purchase a port at places like Rockler or Woodcraft. Cut the hole bigger and then mount the port with some bolts and nuts.

Mike


Mike,
I'm familiar with those types of ports but due to the narrow width of the cover on the sander they probably won't work without heavy modification.

[Scott Snyder]

Thanks Scott. Gee that guy didn't play around with his 6" port!

for the record, I'm that guy. works great, maybe too well. with thin sanding projects i have to restrict flow to prevent the belt from being sucked up to the drum between passes.

[Gene Takae]

for the record, I'm that guy. works great, maybe too well. with thin sanding projects i have to restrict flow to prevent the belt from being sucked up to the drum between passes.

DOH! didn't even notice that it was you! My shop area is small so 4" should be sufficient.

[J. Greg Jones]

A few years ago I bought the 4" port cover from Jet and adapted it to the Performax. I did have to do some trimming on the new cover to work with the original hinge, but it was a pretty simple process. The new cover was fairly inexpensive-under $20 plus shipping from Jet. I'm very happy with the conversion and the improved dust collection.

[Pete Staehling]

Not sure about the Performax 16/32, but my Jet 10/20 benefitted from closing in more of the openings that stopped air from being directed correctly to catch dust. I put a removeable end baffle and a swinging baffle on the outfeed side and it made a very noticeable difference. I have to think that just might be even more effective than just throwing more airflow at it by upsizing the duct.

[Gene Takae]

A few years ago I bought the 4" port cover from Jet and adapted it to the Performax. I did have to do some trimming on the new cover to work with the original hinge, but it was a pretty simple process. The new cover was fairly inexpensive-under $20 plus shipping from Jet. I'm very happy with the conversion and the improved dust collection.


That is a great idea-I will look into that!

[Gene Takae]

Not sure about the Performax 16/32, but my Jet 10/20 benefitted from closing in more of the openings that stopped air from being directed correctly to catch dust. I put a removeable end baffle and a swinging baffle on the outfeed side and it made a very noticeable difference. I have to think that just might be even more effective than just throwing more airflow at it by upsizing the duct.

That makes a lot of sense-I'll have to see where I can make improvements.