Kev Williams
07-22-2016, 7:13 PM
One of my long time customers is a family owned mall (and now internet) based clock & watch shop. About once a month they refurbish someone's old watch, which includes the back. They take pics of the original, then sand a refinish the back, removing most or all of the original wording in the process.
Then they bring the pics and refinished back to me. My job is to reproduce the back to as close to original as possible. After working with the text and such to match, normally I'll use my IS400 and a non-rotating diamond tool for the engraving. I have a single line normal block font that doubles-back over itself so the results are pretty good.
So last week they drop off a back, and THIS picture: (I've covered the SN just in case)
341192
Well, this goes a bit beyond what I'd consider 'close to original' that I could accomplish with a diamond tool!
Now, I could reproduce and engrave it with a diamond, outlining the circles and engraving the text to match, and it would look good, and they'd love it that way--
But I thought this would be a good experiment with the new fiber laser...
First thing I did was look up the "Rado" logo, and find out this is a Swiss watch. A little more research found that they're not all that expensive...,
Still, someone cares enough about it to pay to have it refurbished, so --
--That's where the white knuckles come into play. I only get one shot at it, and as of yet, I haven't found a suitable fiber version of painters tape for test runs.
For that matter, I haven't much chance to do many "runs", let alone test runs.
No mistakes. Must be centered up good. Must look as close to the pic as possible when I'm done...
So I grab some smalll pieces of SS and start test running...
Not enough power...
Too much power...
Too dark...
etc etc.. ;) ... part of the fun!
But I hit on some settings that did what I wanted. BUT- the hatch routine was messing things up. Because at certain points the hatch filling changed directions. If running bottom-up, nearl the end it would reverse and move top-down. And the hatch lines caught the light totally different. The one direction would appear glossier than the other. Looked great except for the mismatched lines. Frustrating...
BUT, I finally hit on the right hatching I needed to get what I wanted. :)
Even then, I actually ended up engraving the back about 6 times.
The whole process took me about 3 hours, which I'll never get paid for, but I'm still learning how to use the thing.
And in the end, it turned out better than I ever expected! Amazing machine.... :D
341193
Then they bring the pics and refinished back to me. My job is to reproduce the back to as close to original as possible. After working with the text and such to match, normally I'll use my IS400 and a non-rotating diamond tool for the engraving. I have a single line normal block font that doubles-back over itself so the results are pretty good.
So last week they drop off a back, and THIS picture: (I've covered the SN just in case)
341192
Well, this goes a bit beyond what I'd consider 'close to original' that I could accomplish with a diamond tool!
Now, I could reproduce and engrave it with a diamond, outlining the circles and engraving the text to match, and it would look good, and they'd love it that way--
But I thought this would be a good experiment with the new fiber laser...
First thing I did was look up the "Rado" logo, and find out this is a Swiss watch. A little more research found that they're not all that expensive...,
Still, someone cares enough about it to pay to have it refurbished, so --
--That's where the white knuckles come into play. I only get one shot at it, and as of yet, I haven't found a suitable fiber version of painters tape for test runs.
For that matter, I haven't much chance to do many "runs", let alone test runs.
No mistakes. Must be centered up good. Must look as close to the pic as possible when I'm done...
So I grab some smalll pieces of SS and start test running...
Not enough power...
Too much power...
Too dark...
etc etc.. ;) ... part of the fun!
But I hit on some settings that did what I wanted. BUT- the hatch routine was messing things up. Because at certain points the hatch filling changed directions. If running bottom-up, nearl the end it would reverse and move top-down. And the hatch lines caught the light totally different. The one direction would appear glossier than the other. Looked great except for the mismatched lines. Frustrating...
BUT, I finally hit on the right hatching I needed to get what I wanted. :)
Even then, I actually ended up engraving the back about 6 times.
The whole process took me about 3 hours, which I'll never get paid for, but I'm still learning how to use the thing.
And in the end, it turned out better than I ever expected! Amazing machine.... :D
341193