PDA

View Full Version : Dog/Holdfast hole size tolerance



Ryan McKenna
02-22-2015, 9:06 PM
Hi All,
I am working on a workbench with a 2x4 top. The top will end up about 3" thick. I am at stage to start drilling my dog holes and need your guys' advice on drill bit size tolerances. My plan had been to use my brace and #12 auger bit for the holes. I have bought a pair of Gramercy hold fast and drilled a hole in the bench top to use one when working on the apron dovetails. Granted I was only using one holdface but I did not find it held that great. i roughed up the shaft a but using sandpaper like i have seen recommended before but it did not help much. I noticed there was a bit of space between the holdfast and the hole when inserted so I measured the auger bit and it is 0.755. So this week I stopped at Lee Valley and picked up a 3/4 auger bit but when I went to use it tonight realized the drill I had that I thought could use 1/2" shanks was actually only 1/4".

So before I exchange this bit for something else I thought I would check with you guys to ask if my original bit too big to use with the holdfasts? Should I try roughing up the holdfast shaft more? Or should I get a different bit from Lee valley?

Thanks for your advice.
Ryan

ken hatch
02-22-2015, 9:16 PM
Three inch thick slab should be no problem.....that said, holdfasts are a little black magic and some times one will give problems for no apparent reason. The #12 should work fine, what wood is the slab?

ken

Jim Koepke
02-22-2015, 9:30 PM
What is the measure on the holdfast shafts?

My recollection is mine are ~5/8" and work fine in a 3/4" hole.

When abrading the hold fasts, go around the shaft, not the length.

jtk

Matt ONeill
02-22-2015, 10:16 PM
Ryan,

I've got a number of the gramercy holdfasts, and sandpaper never worked for me.. I tried counterboring my holes (4" thick bench), using sandpaper on the holdfasts, nothing would work. Someone somewhere suggested using a center punch on the shaft instead of sandpaper, and boy did that do the trick. I just used one of those cheapo spring loaded center punches, and went up and down the shafts real quick. Now they grip like the dickens. It made such a difference, I think Joel should change his instructions on the TFWW website.

- Matt


Hi All,
I am working on a workbench with a 2x4 top. The top will end up about 3" thick. I am at stage to start drilling my dog holes and need your guys' advice on drill bit size tolerances. My plan had been to use my brace and #12 auger bit for the holes. I have bought a pair of Gramercy hold fast and drilled a hole in the bench top to use one when working on the apron dovetails. Granted I was only using one holdface but I did not find it held that great. i roughed up the shaft a but using sandpaper like i have seen recommended before but it did not help much. I noticed there was a bit of space between the holdfast and the hole when inserted so I measured the auger bit and it is 0.755. So this week I stopped at Lee Valley and picked up a 3/4 auger bit but when I went to use it tonight realized the drill I had that I thought could use 1/2" shanks was actually only 1/4".

So before I exchange this bit for something else I thought I would check with you guys to ask if my original bit too big to use with the holdfasts? Should I try roughing up the holdfast shaft more? Or should I get a different bit from Lee valley?

Thanks for your advice.
Ryan

Richard Hutchings
02-23-2015, 7:09 AM
I have the the exact bench top as you. 3" thick made from 2X4s, and gramercy holdfasts. I used a 3/4" auger bit and I never even cleaned or rough sanded the holdfasts as many suggest. I wanted to see how the work right out of the box. Perfect everytime.

Bob Snyder - Austin
02-23-2015, 9:19 AM
I have the the exact bench top as you. 3" thick made from 2X4s, and gramercy holdfasts. I used a 3/4" auger bit and I never even cleaned or rough sanded the holdfasts as many suggest. I wanted to see how the work right out of the box. Perfect everytime. I have this experience also. However my Veritas dogs needed a slightly larger hole.

Ryan McKenna
02-23-2015, 12:18 PM
I'm not sure what the wood 2x4 are up here. I believe it is either spruce or a type of pine.

Ryan McKenna
02-23-2015, 12:32 PM
Thanks for the replies everyone. Sounds like my original auger bit should work. I will try roughing up the holdfasts a bit more. I think last time I sanded in a spiral down the shaft, this time I will go around it more.

Thanks for the tip Matt, if sanding doesn't work will try the centre punch on one of them. I haven't seen that tip before.

Marc Seguin
02-24-2015, 4:52 PM
I'm in the process of making a bench right now as well. I used one of my flea market #12 auger bits without checking it first and found that it measured 0.770" after I had most of the holes drilled. The grammercy holdfasts I have come in at 0.717". At first I was pretty worried about the sloppy fit, but after trying them out there hasn't been a problem. My bench top is only 2" thick Douglas Fir though.

Even though my holdfasts worked well from the get go, I did do the sandpaper thing to them. It didn't seem to make a massive difference. What DID make a world of difference was epoxying some leather onto the pads. They grip much more tenaciously with the leather face, and it's friendlier to the work pieces.

I'd try the leather upgrade with your existing brace holes before trying another bit.

lowell holmes
02-24-2015, 7:28 PM
Auger bits are 1/64" oversize according to the booklet that came with my Irwin bits. I would suggest you drill the holes with a forstner bit.
Check the inserts here in this link.

http://www.leevalley.com/US/wood/page.aspx?cat=1,41637&p=72602

Jim Koepke
02-25-2015, 1:36 AM
Auger bits are 1/64" oversize according to the booklet that came with my Irwin bits.

There are different types of auger bits. The common types for the construction trades are oversize. Dowelling bits will be very close to exact size.

Here is a post of mine where eight 1/2" auger bits are compared:

http://www.sawmillcreek.org/showthread.php?131238-A-Bit-About-Augers

jtk

Stephen Clement
02-25-2015, 6:50 AM
I had great success with my gramercy holdfasts in my 3" bench (Douglas fir) using a #12 auger and sandpaper on the shafts. I have found they hold better if you put your thumb on the pad while you strike the crook. This keeps the holdfast from bouncing instead of setting.

ian maybury
02-25-2015, 7:31 AM
Even our esteemed mag writers treat the topic of holdfasts gripping as though it's a 'mystery'. It isn't...

There are two primary variables involved - the clearance/diameter difference between the shank of the holdfast and the dog hole in the bench, and the thickness of the bench top. (= effective depth/length of the dog hole). These combine to determine the angle the holdfast can lean out of vertical by when forced to tilt by the action of the clamping force under the pad that bears on the work. This angle in turn determines how effectively the end of the shank protruding out of the bottom of the dog hole can hook under the lower surface of the bench top to resist its lifting out.

If the angle is too little, then the clamping force (having caused the shank to deflect a hair) will result in its sliding upwards in the hole and letting go. Roughening the shank will delay this effect/permit a grip at a somewhat shallower tilt angle, and any trace of oil or wax on the shank will likewise reduce the grip - but these are secondary factors. The real fix is to ensure enough tilt angle.

While mild roughing up is a good idea, heavy roughening of the holdfast shank is probably not - in that it's likely to lead to heavy wear of the dog hole. It's in effect barking up the wrong tree as this is not the primary means by which a holdfast grips.

The mechanism is described in alternative language in post no. 8 here: http://www.sawmillcreek.org/showthread.php?225374-Thinnest-and-thickest-surface-for-holdfasts-to-work&highlight=holdfast Follow the link from it to post no. 20 in a previous thread for a more engineering based explanation and drawing.

The Grammercy hold fasts pop up (:) accidental pun!) in this sort of discussion more often than others because they are made from bright steel bar - the normal tolerance of which is just a hair under nominal. Which means that they end up being a pretty close fit in a hole drilled by anything that produces a close to nominal size hole - so the tilt angle ends up too small in the thicker bench tops most are going for now. Leading to poor grip. The problem isn't the hold fast, but the hole diameter - they fairly clearly work very well in holes drilled with a brad point bit in tops up to a little over 2in.

It's counter intuitive (how can a holdfast grip better in a sloppier hole?), but as Richard/Jim/Marc/Bob the answer for thicker tops is almost certainly to use a bit or drill type that delivers a larger diameter hole/greater clearance/more tilt angle. Try some test holes first though just in case.

Thicker bench tops reduce the tilt angle for a given hole diameter, so thicker tops need larger diameter dog holes/more clearance over the shank of the holdfast - or alternatively counter bore the dog hole from underneath to reduce the effective thickness the holdfast sees to one that works. This also makes available more clamping height/capacity - and as above don't expect a holdfast to grip properly unless the end of the shank protrudes from the lower end of the dog hole...

ian

lowell holmes
02-25-2015, 7:48 AM
There are different types of auger bits. The common types for the construction trades are oversize. Dowelling bits will be very close to exact size.

Here is a post of mine where eight 1/2" auger bits are compared.

jtk

Where is the post? It didn't make the trip.:confused:

I don't doubt at all that there are different diameters in auger bits. However, I wouldn't know where to find auger dowelling bits. I've never seen any bit manufacturing company other than Irwin post such information.

Brian Holcombe
02-25-2015, 8:43 AM
My holdfasts sort of made their own clearance.

ian maybury
02-25-2015, 11:44 AM
This is what an adjustable engineering hand reamer for tuning the tolerance of holes in metal (e.g. the bore of bronze bearing bushes after they are pressed into place) looks like: http://www.newmantools.com/reamer/expanding.htm Much cheaper these days than used to be the case, but still well over $100.

One key feature is that the cutters form a long enough cylinder for the tool to remain properly aligned with the axis of the starting hole.

I wonder if a low cost version of any such tool for use on wood exists?

ian

Jim Koepke
02-25-2015, 12:52 PM
Where is the post? It didn't make the trip.

Oops, it has been added to the post.

It can also be found by its title here or through Google, "A Bit About Augers."

jtk

Jim Koepke
02-25-2015, 1:00 PM
I wonder if a low cost version of any such tool for use on wood exists?

I think it is called, "a bigger drill bit." :D

I recall buying a an expandable reamer back in the early 1970s for about $20. It was needed to ream the bushings for my VW buss's steering pivot pin. My recollection was finishing the job a little after 2:00 am with frost in my mustache. The improvement in the steering was worth the effort and the ream was sold at cost to a friend who wanted to do his.

More recently another larger one was acquired from my brother who picked up a bunch at scrap metal prices.

Oink! Oink! The tool pig moniker should be worn proudly!

jtk

ian maybury
02-25-2015, 3:04 PM
That rings a few bells Jim, only in my case it was the small end bushing on a Triumph Tiger Cub motorcycle back in the late 60s.

A bigger drill bit is one route :) - but running a slightly larger one through a previously drilled hole isn't always ideal given the risk of grabbing. Guess i was just thinking that something adjustable and less aggressive would be nice - it'd allow a sneaking up on the ideal dimension for a given holdfast. Probably not robust enough, but there's definitely a tapered variety about with a wooden body and an adjustable blade....

Jim Koepke
02-25-2015, 4:16 PM
Probably not robust enough, but there's definitely a tapered variety about with a wooden body and an adjustable blade....

Sounds like a project for a day when one finds an old bandsaw blade and a dowel...

jtk

ian maybury
02-25-2015, 6:35 PM
Exactly. The thought was in the context of how to set up to test just what hole diameter and hole length works best for a given holdfast. It'd be interesting to run the issue to ground and produce some fact rather than relying on hearsay. I've started my (very slow moving) bench - I'll probably run a few trials and report in due course .

Matt ONeill
02-25-2015, 10:40 PM
Well, I can only give you my personal experience. I've got 4 of the grammercy holdfasts, and a 4" thick ash bench. At first, they worked great out of the box. After a couple years, they barely worked at all (and I counter bored my holes from the bottom). However, I purchased some lie-Nielsen holdfasts, and they worked great. The difference? The LNs are cast, and have a rough shaft. My opinion is that the holes get burnished over time, and a rougher shaft overcomes this.

- Matt