Peter Ulmanis
06-25-2005, 9:13 AM
I have been lurking for sometime on SMC and recently registered. At the Shaker Viilage Wood Days last year, Dave Andersen sugeested suggested that I give it a look and I have been reading your threads ever since.
I have been very impressed with two things, the supportive nature of threads (Important to me because I am a newby in hand tools), and the way threads stay on topic, something that drove me crazy on another forum.
OK, time for my question: I bought a Stanley 42X sawset on the Bay and the seller included an extra, A brass card, slightly lager than a credit card with holes in it. My first thought was a guage to measure round stock.
What has me puzzeled is the numbers. The largest hole is marked 13 and is about 3/4 inch in diameter the smallest is marked 5 over O with what I would say is a fraction line. One hole is marked O. The hole next to it , slightly smaller, is marked 32 with no fraction line. The next is 0 1/2, followed by a 2 over O with a fraction line. Between 2 1/2 and 3 there is a hole marked 35 (no fraction line).
This numbering system has me baffled. Anyone have any ideas? BTW I don't expect any antique value in this device, just curious.
Peter
I have been very impressed with two things, the supportive nature of threads (Important to me because I am a newby in hand tools), and the way threads stay on topic, something that drove me crazy on another forum.
OK, time for my question: I bought a Stanley 42X sawset on the Bay and the seller included an extra, A brass card, slightly lager than a credit card with holes in it. My first thought was a guage to measure round stock.
What has me puzzeled is the numbers. The largest hole is marked 13 and is about 3/4 inch in diameter the smallest is marked 5 over O with what I would say is a fraction line. One hole is marked O. The hole next to it , slightly smaller, is marked 32 with no fraction line. The next is 0 1/2, followed by a 2 over O with a fraction line. Between 2 1/2 and 3 there is a hole marked 35 (no fraction line).
This numbering system has me baffled. Anyone have any ideas? BTW I don't expect any antique value in this device, just curious.
Peter