Kim Malmberg
10-30-2013, 5:59 PM
This post might not impress everybody so I'm calling it an interesting find instead of a gloat.
I've always been fond of the smaller tool makers. So when I spotted an Aussie hand plane on a "Online auction site near you™, I had to make a run for it.
After a battle with another curious and probably equally uncertain buyer, I won the auction and a few days later arrived a Turner no 4 smoothing plane.
I won't show you any pictures before you have read far enough, as some of you might turn your eyes away in disgust. But I can assure you, there's no need for parental guidance.
Yes, it has plastic handles. Yes, it has a frog made of aluminum.
While you let this sink in I will tell you the plane also has a very solid and well made body, the handles are translucent (á la MF permaloid) and that the plane is fitted with a Erik Anton Berg cutter made specifically for the Turner tool company.
I will not try to steal the know how part of this as all I know about this company is borrowed from the Village Woodworker (http://thevillagewoodworker.blogspot.com/2012/11/turner-hand-planes-small-review.html) down under.
What I can add is that I agree with his review. This is a very well made hand plane. The celluloid acetate handles feels good in my hands and bring a light smile to my face, much needed in the dark era of Finnish autumn awaiting the even worse. The aluminum frog is of course a slight concern. Will it hold up against had use? But as long as I remember not to tighten either the lever cap or the frog screws too much I ought to be OK. And I just love having a Berg cutter made specifically for metal hand planes which can be used not in only in this plane but also my MF no 9.
So here's my plane. (http://www.flickr.com/photos/finnberg68/sets/72157637135883683/)
It was purchased from an Englishman who says his father worked in Australia for a few years and who thinks his dad must have bought the plane during his stay. From what I know it hasn't been used very much. It's not unused but the scar tissue on the surface has more to do with being stored away improperly than hard use. The plane has some shallow pitting on both sole and cheeks and I discovered rust on the handle bolts as well as the bolt housing inside the handles. By the look of the bleached and very tatty box and the mildew stench coming from it, I would guess the plane has been stored in a outside shed but succumbed to sunshine and varying temperatures, which would very well explain why the plane has been sweating and corroding.
The handles are intact and I hope that adding some wax might help them to stay sound. Luckily they not been subjected to direct sunlight.
There's also a very nice addition to the fastening of the front knob. The raised knob housing has a recess cut into it at the front side. The knob has a mating little toe which fits into the recess. This will keep the front knob from rotating and prevent the user from over tightening the knob. An ingenious invention.
The plane has only been taken for a short spin on some ash, but it does feel promising. The cutter had been resharpened but not across its full edge so it needs a proper resharpening before I can provide a verdict.
What I can say is that I have compared the weight of this plane with a MF no 9 (Type 2) and a Stanley low knob no 4.
The Turner is the decidedly heaviest of them all, even considering this plane has plastic handles and a frog made of aluminum. It weighs in at 1750 grams. Forgive me but you have to do your scale conversion yourself.
The MF no 9 weighs 1680 grams and the Stanley no 4 a mere 1610 grams.
The difference are not mind blowing and might be moot for most users, but it does say something about the solidity of this plane.
I've always been fond of the smaller tool makers. So when I spotted an Aussie hand plane on a "Online auction site near you™, I had to make a run for it.
After a battle with another curious and probably equally uncertain buyer, I won the auction and a few days later arrived a Turner no 4 smoothing plane.
I won't show you any pictures before you have read far enough, as some of you might turn your eyes away in disgust. But I can assure you, there's no need for parental guidance.
Yes, it has plastic handles. Yes, it has a frog made of aluminum.
While you let this sink in I will tell you the plane also has a very solid and well made body, the handles are translucent (á la MF permaloid) and that the plane is fitted with a Erik Anton Berg cutter made specifically for the Turner tool company.
I will not try to steal the know how part of this as all I know about this company is borrowed from the Village Woodworker (http://thevillagewoodworker.blogspot.com/2012/11/turner-hand-planes-small-review.html) down under.
What I can add is that I agree with his review. This is a very well made hand plane. The celluloid acetate handles feels good in my hands and bring a light smile to my face, much needed in the dark era of Finnish autumn awaiting the even worse. The aluminum frog is of course a slight concern. Will it hold up against had use? But as long as I remember not to tighten either the lever cap or the frog screws too much I ought to be OK. And I just love having a Berg cutter made specifically for metal hand planes which can be used not in only in this plane but also my MF no 9.
So here's my plane. (http://www.flickr.com/photos/finnberg68/sets/72157637135883683/)
It was purchased from an Englishman who says his father worked in Australia for a few years and who thinks his dad must have bought the plane during his stay. From what I know it hasn't been used very much. It's not unused but the scar tissue on the surface has more to do with being stored away improperly than hard use. The plane has some shallow pitting on both sole and cheeks and I discovered rust on the handle bolts as well as the bolt housing inside the handles. By the look of the bleached and very tatty box and the mildew stench coming from it, I would guess the plane has been stored in a outside shed but succumbed to sunshine and varying temperatures, which would very well explain why the plane has been sweating and corroding.
The handles are intact and I hope that adding some wax might help them to stay sound. Luckily they not been subjected to direct sunlight.
There's also a very nice addition to the fastening of the front knob. The raised knob housing has a recess cut into it at the front side. The knob has a mating little toe which fits into the recess. This will keep the front knob from rotating and prevent the user from over tightening the knob. An ingenious invention.
The plane has only been taken for a short spin on some ash, but it does feel promising. The cutter had been resharpened but not across its full edge so it needs a proper resharpening before I can provide a verdict.
What I can say is that I have compared the weight of this plane with a MF no 9 (Type 2) and a Stanley low knob no 4.
The Turner is the decidedly heaviest of them all, even considering this plane has plastic handles and a frog made of aluminum. It weighs in at 1750 grams. Forgive me but you have to do your scale conversion yourself.
The MF no 9 weighs 1680 grams and the Stanley no 4 a mere 1610 grams.
The difference are not mind blowing and might be moot for most users, but it does say something about the solidity of this plane.