Derek Cohen
07-02-2013, 9:18 AM
There have been a few posts on the forums about purchasing the KC fretsaw, and one that said that the new version was too heavy. I thought that I would write a note about how I use this fretsaw.
For reference, there is an article I wrote about the development of the KC fretsaw for use in woodworking. This details how it came about and how it evolved: http://www.inthewoodshop.com/ToolReviews/KnewConceptsFretsaw.html
Having been there at the beginning, it is not surprising that I am still interested, although I no longer have input into the design. My good fortune is to have a great friend in Lee Marshall, who sends me saws and asks my opinion.
Here is the new (left) and the original (right) versions of the 5" fretsaw:
http://i13.photobucket.com/albums/a262/Derek50/saws/Knew%20Concepts/KC7_zpsff124b98.jpg
The change in the construction of the titanium model was forced upon Lee by the cost of the material. Lee had to find a better way of using it - a one-piece construction was too wasteful of titanium sheets. The "Birdcage" design came about (my name for it is the "Eiffel Tower" :) ).
http://i13.photobucket.com/albums/a262/Derek50/saws/Knew%20Concepts/KC6_zps8a915075.jpg
I raised concerns (from photos) with Lee even before I had a chance to try it out: the reason why the original fretsaw has been such a hit is partly because the frame is so stiff to create high blade tension, and partly because it is so light to create great control. The new saw design threatened to maintain the stiffness but lose the lightness where it counted, at the back where it affected the balance.
Lee sent me a fretsaw (actually, he sent me the new coping saw as well - more later), and I had the opportunity to put it through its paces. This was quite recently, and it was used in my current project, the kist - there were certainly a good many dovetails to saw out in hard and chewy Curly Marri.
Well I was correct about the back of the saw weighing more and changing the balance of the saw. It must be pointed out that this would likely go unnoticed by those who did not have the opportunity to use the two saws side-by-side. The differences are not great, but are real. I thought that the new saw was not as nice to use as the original version.
Another set of pics:
http://i13.photobucket.com/albums/a262/Derek50/saws/Knew%20Concepts/KC8_zpsdd0d736d.jpg
The other change was a slightly improved blade adjustment mechanism courtesy of a wider knurled knob. I think that the knurled knobs for the blade were made standard a while ago, but they were originally T-bars, which did not look nearly as nice or work as well.
Old above, new below ...
http://i13.photobucket.com/albums/a262/Derek50/saws/Knew%20Concepts/KC9_zpsa2488678.jpg
What was improved was the blade tension. The original saw created high tension. The new version goes a little better. More tension is good tension.
It dawned on me that I could use the saw differently for dovetail waste removal. One of the factors that stirred my thoughts was my preference in handle. The original saw came with a handle that I considered to be too short ... but then I like longer handles in my chisels, so that should not come as a surprise to those who have read my comments on chisel handle design. Lee agreed that the (original) fretsaw handles could be improved, however he saw this as an improvement in looks/materials and not design. If you want a handle made from a more exotic wood, Elkhead Tools make them, and they are indeed stunning!
http://www.knewconcepts.com/img/woodhandles.jpg
There is no doubt that these fretsaw handles are in the same class as the Dave Jeske's Blue Spruce chisel handles, which I consider the best around. But they are not my design of choice.
My preference is for a handle that is longer still. Here you can see the KC handles alongside one I made ...
http://i13.photobucket.com/albums/a262/Derek50/saws/Knew%20Concepts/KC10_zps35301c96.jpg
It was this handle that gave me the idea to use the new fretsaw with two hands rather than one ..
http://i13.photobucket.com/albums/a262/Derek50/saws/Knew%20Concepts/KC2_zps10399746.jpg
http://i13.photobucket.com/albums/a262/Derek50/saws/Knew%20Concepts/KC4_zps3cc1009d.jpg
What a difference! Now the saw was completely rock solid and balanced.
I have used this grip on the KC coping saw as well. Again it creates a solid, balanced saw for great control ..
http://i13.photobucket.com/albums/a262/Derek50/saws/Knew%20Concepts/KC3_zpsef2af462.jpg
The KC saws may be used with the existing handles. They do not need to be changed out. However, the double-handed grip is easier with a longer handle. Easy enough to make if you prefer this. Or get one made (try Elkhead). If others agree, I will work on Lee to offer the longer handle.
Bottom line: if you have the original version, you have a great saw. If you have the new version, you have an improved version of a great saw.
Regards from Perth
Derek
For reference, there is an article I wrote about the development of the KC fretsaw for use in woodworking. This details how it came about and how it evolved: http://www.inthewoodshop.com/ToolReviews/KnewConceptsFretsaw.html
Having been there at the beginning, it is not surprising that I am still interested, although I no longer have input into the design. My good fortune is to have a great friend in Lee Marshall, who sends me saws and asks my opinion.
Here is the new (left) and the original (right) versions of the 5" fretsaw:
http://i13.photobucket.com/albums/a262/Derek50/saws/Knew%20Concepts/KC7_zpsff124b98.jpg
The change in the construction of the titanium model was forced upon Lee by the cost of the material. Lee had to find a better way of using it - a one-piece construction was too wasteful of titanium sheets. The "Birdcage" design came about (my name for it is the "Eiffel Tower" :) ).
http://i13.photobucket.com/albums/a262/Derek50/saws/Knew%20Concepts/KC6_zps8a915075.jpg
I raised concerns (from photos) with Lee even before I had a chance to try it out: the reason why the original fretsaw has been such a hit is partly because the frame is so stiff to create high blade tension, and partly because it is so light to create great control. The new saw design threatened to maintain the stiffness but lose the lightness where it counted, at the back where it affected the balance.
Lee sent me a fretsaw (actually, he sent me the new coping saw as well - more later), and I had the opportunity to put it through its paces. This was quite recently, and it was used in my current project, the kist - there were certainly a good many dovetails to saw out in hard and chewy Curly Marri.
Well I was correct about the back of the saw weighing more and changing the balance of the saw. It must be pointed out that this would likely go unnoticed by those who did not have the opportunity to use the two saws side-by-side. The differences are not great, but are real. I thought that the new saw was not as nice to use as the original version.
Another set of pics:
http://i13.photobucket.com/albums/a262/Derek50/saws/Knew%20Concepts/KC8_zpsdd0d736d.jpg
The other change was a slightly improved blade adjustment mechanism courtesy of a wider knurled knob. I think that the knurled knobs for the blade were made standard a while ago, but they were originally T-bars, which did not look nearly as nice or work as well.
Old above, new below ...
http://i13.photobucket.com/albums/a262/Derek50/saws/Knew%20Concepts/KC9_zpsa2488678.jpg
What was improved was the blade tension. The original saw created high tension. The new version goes a little better. More tension is good tension.
It dawned on me that I could use the saw differently for dovetail waste removal. One of the factors that stirred my thoughts was my preference in handle. The original saw came with a handle that I considered to be too short ... but then I like longer handles in my chisels, so that should not come as a surprise to those who have read my comments on chisel handle design. Lee agreed that the (original) fretsaw handles could be improved, however he saw this as an improvement in looks/materials and not design. If you want a handle made from a more exotic wood, Elkhead Tools make them, and they are indeed stunning!
http://www.knewconcepts.com/img/woodhandles.jpg
There is no doubt that these fretsaw handles are in the same class as the Dave Jeske's Blue Spruce chisel handles, which I consider the best around. But they are not my design of choice.
My preference is for a handle that is longer still. Here you can see the KC handles alongside one I made ...
http://i13.photobucket.com/albums/a262/Derek50/saws/Knew%20Concepts/KC10_zps35301c96.jpg
It was this handle that gave me the idea to use the new fretsaw with two hands rather than one ..
http://i13.photobucket.com/albums/a262/Derek50/saws/Knew%20Concepts/KC2_zps10399746.jpg
http://i13.photobucket.com/albums/a262/Derek50/saws/Knew%20Concepts/KC4_zps3cc1009d.jpg
What a difference! Now the saw was completely rock solid and balanced.
I have used this grip on the KC coping saw as well. Again it creates a solid, balanced saw for great control ..
http://i13.photobucket.com/albums/a262/Derek50/saws/Knew%20Concepts/KC3_zpsef2af462.jpg
The KC saws may be used with the existing handles. They do not need to be changed out. However, the double-handed grip is easier with a longer handle. Easy enough to make if you prefer this. Or get one made (try Elkhead). If others agree, I will work on Lee to offer the longer handle.
Bottom line: if you have the original version, you have a great saw. If you have the new version, you have an improved version of a great saw.
Regards from Perth
Derek