PDA

View Full Version : Jet Lathe HP?



Tom Caldwell
11-27-2011, 8:42 PM
Thinking of making the plunge for the 16-in EVS. Is it worth the extra $300+ to get the 2HP instead of the 1.5? I mostly turn bowls and boxes with an occasional spindle. The 1.5 has some appeal because it is 115 V and would allow more fexibilty in placing it in the shop without additional 230V wiring. Opinions welcome.

Bernie Weishapl
11-27-2011, 8:46 PM
I don't have the Jet but my Nova DVR is 115 V and 1.5 hp. I haven't had or noticed any need to have bigger. I turned some awful big 16" chunks with no problems.

John Keeton
11-27-2011, 8:54 PM
I have the 2hp and don't regret it, but I suspect for what I do the 1.5 would do just as well. I think it depends largely on how much you like to "hog off" wood on a roughout. If you think you want to take a 3/4" ribbon that is 1/4" thick, then you might want to consider the 2hp!

Jason Silva
11-27-2011, 8:55 PM
I have the same DVR XP and love every second of it. It is a direct drive vs a pully so i dont know if that matters but the 1.5 is just fine. The 2hp might be bigger and heavier which would be a plus when it comes to the lathe vibrating.

Richard Allen
11-27-2011, 9:04 PM
Whatever you get you are going to love that lathe. You will become accustom to whatever power you get and you will never know (or care) what the other power would be like.

With that said I would go with 2 HP.

Gary Max
11-27-2011, 9:06 PM
That extra hp sure comes in handy some days.

Reed Gray
11-27-2011, 9:50 PM
For production purposes, you need the 2 hp. More torque. If you aren't concerned about time, the 1.5 hp is fine. I have demonstrated on one and found it to be way under powered for the way I turn.

robo hippy

Dale Miner
11-27-2011, 9:59 PM
For production purposes, you need the 2 hp. More torque. If you aren't concerned about time, the 1.5 hp is fine. I have demonstrated on one and found it to be way under powered for the way I turn.

robo hippy

What Reed said.

Cary Falk
11-27-2011, 10:30 PM
I don't post much in the turning forum because I don't have much to show yet. I moved from the HF gem to a 2hp 1642. I wanted it to be my last lathe. Since I'm not a hard core turner 1.5 would probably have been enough. I put a long heavy duty cord on it so I didn't have to run another outlet.

Steve Schlumpf
11-27-2011, 10:34 PM
Tom - if you can afford it, then get the 2 hp. Better to have the power and not need it, than to need it and not have it. That and as long as I have been on this site, I have never once heard someone complain that their lathe had too much power!

Bob Bergstrom
11-27-2011, 11:21 PM
If this is not your first lathe, think of why you are upgrading in the first place. If you were stalling the previous one and wished for a little more power, the same will likely occur with 1 1/2 hp. Of course it won't be quite as often. I have a 3520 and wish it was a 3hp. but I do quite a few bowls over 16". The horsepower comes in handy in the roughing out stage. The larger the diameter the easier it is to stall it. When finishing a bowl, it is all about light cuts and avoiding vibration on thin and large bowl. They can become like a drum and like to resonate.:eek:

Jim Burr
11-27-2011, 11:25 PM
Or you can just enjoy a bigger better lathe and have fun with it! If you don't know it ain't broke...why ask if it needs fixing! 1642 1.5 will be here on wednesday.

Michelle Rich
11-28-2011, 6:52 AM
Isn't it funny, that everyone thinks that more hsp is better? I made a living, turning for over 25 yrs on 3/4 hsp machines. I even had to move the belt for speed change by hand. For many years I made chair parts on a homemade springpole lathe.. one leg power! Somehow i produced tons of stuff. Keep your tools sharp & think the process thru before you start, and get whatever lathe you think will work best for you.

Dan Hintz
11-28-2011, 7:00 AM
Also consider your plans to upgrade in the future. No sense in spending the extra money for the extra HP if you'll end up replacing the lathe with something bigger (and more powerful) a year down the road).

If the bug has truly bitten you, the vortex will suck you in and an upgrade is definitely in your future.

Greg Just
11-28-2011, 7:07 AM
I have the Jet 1.5 HP mainly because of power limitations in my shop. I have had the lathe for 8 months and it has worked well for me. For what I have been turning, I'm satisfied.

Bob Espy
11-28-2011, 8:01 AM
My 1.5 HP Jet 1642 handles 16" bowls and the McNaughton coring system. It may be slower than a 2 HP but how much. I guess if your in the production business you'ld want something bigger than even the 2 HP, but how many of us do this for a living? If it takes me ten minutes longer to produce three bowls who cares?

steven carter
11-28-2011, 9:41 AM
I have the 1.5 hp model and have turned some very large and heavy blanks without any problem. I do put the belt on the lower range for roughing though, it has less speed and more torque. I'm sure that if I had the 2 hp I would like it, but in over 3 years I haven't had the occasion to rue the fact that I have the 1.5 hp version.

Thom Sturgill
11-28-2011, 10:02 AM
I have the 1.5 hp model and recently had it bog down with a 12" cherry bowl - but then realized that I had not set the belt into the lower range. Probably would have been fine. OTOH, having turned on a 2hp powermatic I find that I lust for one!!!

charlie knighton
11-28-2011, 10:07 AM
i have the 1.5 and unless i win the lottery i am not considering an upgrade, the $ difference between 2.0 and 1.5 went for outboard turning stand

Tom Caldwell
11-29-2011, 2:24 PM
Thanks for all the great input. I placed an order today for 2HP model. I figure this will be my last lathe purchase so go for all the budget can stand. There will be a nice Woodfast lathe on the market soon.

Steve Schlumpf
11-29-2011, 2:39 PM
Congrats on your new lathe Tom! You will love it! Looking forward to seeing the photos!!

Richard Jones
11-29-2011, 3:28 PM
Tom,

Hard to go wrong with more power. I've had my Jet several years now and just love it.

Wilmington, huh? In a former life, I used to work at a boatyard down in Masonboro.......small world.....

And, of course, photos are not optional....

Rich

Tom Caldwell
11-29-2011, 3:53 PM
Tom,

Wilmington, huh? In a former life, I used to work at a boatyard down in Masonboro.......small world.....

Rich
Sadly, the old Masonboro Boat yard is strictly a marina and private club now. No more craftsmen there.