PDA

View Full Version : The Studley Workbench



Andrew Joiner
10-13-2011, 1:10 PM
I'm designing my own bench. It will be much nicer than any benches I've ever built. Then I saw this. Click on the second link for a slideshow to all the photos.

My design is wimpy compared to the Studley!

(http://www.flickr.com/photos/lostartpress/sets/72157627709048335/show/)
H.O. Studley’s Workbench (Most of it, Anyway) (http://lostartpress.wordpress.com/2011/10/06/h-o-studley’s-workbench-most-of-it-anyway/)Posted on October 6, 2011 (http://lostartpress.wordpress.com/2011/10/06/h-o-studley’s-workbench-most-of-it-anyway/) by lostartpress (http://lostartpress.wordpress.com/author/lostartpress/)
http://lostartpress.files.wordpress.com/2011/10/studley_bench_img_0307.jpg?w=640&h=480 (http://lostartpress.files.wordpress.com/2011/10/studley_bench_img_0307.jpg)
Henry O. Studley was a piano maker and he had a bench that suited his trade. And though we are still in the initial stages of researching his work, some accounts suggest that he was a craftsman who specialized in building prototype organs and pianos for the Poole Piano Co. before the units went into production.
This fact, if it bears out, helps explain some things we saw while poring over the man’s tool chest and workbench for Don Williams’s forthcoming book “Virtuoso: The Toolbox of Henry O. Studley.”
During our visit, I looked over the workbench that sits below Studley’s tool chest. It bears a family resemblance to the one owned by ironmonger Patrick Leach. Leach’s bench was owned by a piano case maker who lived in the same area and time that Studley worked. See the photos here (http://www.popularwoodworking.com/woodworking-blogs/chris-schwarz-blog/workbenches/patrick-leach’s-awesome-american-workbench).
So I am presenting the following bullet points on the Studley bench without much comment. I am still processing a lot of the data I wrote down, including 41 pages of typewritten notes, so I don’t have answers. I have just data and a sore bottom. But because data is better that a swift kick to… anywhere, here we go.
Some things I know about H.O. Studley’s workbench.
1. The benchtop is original. The base was made by the current owner and is modeled after the chest. The workmanship on the re-creation is excellent, though it is not aged to look like a vintage original.
2. The benchtop was acquired at the same time the owner acquired the chest.
3. The benchtop is made up primarily of three gorgeous pieces of Cuban mahogany. There are additional mahogany pieces on the ends that cover the end grain.
4. The top is banded by ebony that is let into a rabbet in the benchtop. The ebony is 1/2” x 1/2”.
5. Inside the ebony band, the three mahogany pieces measure 15-15/16” wide, 6-15/16” wide and 5-5/32” wide. The top tapers in its overall width. The tail vise end is 1/4” narrower than the face vise end.
6. The top is 3” thick overall, 30” wide (at its widest) and 78” long.
7. The dogs in the benchtop are 1” x 3/4”. The dogs are ebony. They are 4-1/4” long and are held in the holes with brass spring clips. The dogs are held flush to the top of the benchtop by a small metal clip at the bottom of the dog hole. This clip runs in a stopped groove in each dog. It is… remarkable. Every dog hole has a dog. All of the dogs are spaced on 7-1/2” centers, except for one.
8. The vises were plated with nickel when the owner acquired them, but they were rusting and in need. The collector had them re-plated. There was a lot of effort put into masking original surfaces to preserve the smooth action and tolerances of the vises.
9. The sliding dog on the tail vise is… interesting to me. It is a sliding dovetail that runs in ways that are cut in the vise chop. The tolerances on the machining is remarkable. The dog is pushed up and down easily and holds its position. All dogs should be so obedient.
To see a slideshow of my photos, click here (http://www.flickr.com/photos/lostartpress/sets/72157627709048335/show/).
Like all things with H.O. Studley, you should take this data with a pinch of salt. There is a lot of misinformation out there. The first Fine Woodworking poster of the chest discussed the “stonemason” tools inside it. Duh.
So I recommend you enjoy the photos and try not to jump to any conclusions until 2013, which is when Williams’s book on Studley is scheduled to be printed.
— Christopher Schwarz


Posted in Virtuoso: The Toolbo (http://lostartpress.wordpress.com/category/virtuoso-the-toolbox-of-henry-o-studley/)

Jim Matthews
10-13-2011, 1:44 PM
I like the vise layout, on adjacent corners. This allows a large board to be worked on edge, along the front face of the bench.
Say what you will about cabinets beneath a bench, but I like having my regular "users" immediately available.

Note the absence of the shaving catcher *ahem* tool tray. That's the one part of my bench that provides little utility.
I find the brightwork on this restoration a bit much. Tools should look well used, in my opinion.

Tom Walz
10-13-2011, 5:11 PM
Tools are sort of like guns and dogs.

They are fun when they are shiny and new.

They are still fun when they are old and worn.

Each stage has its own thrill and its own beauty.

Chris Studley
12-14-2011, 11:49 AM
Hey hey... where is this located nowadays? I know it was in the Smithsonian, but don't believe it is currently there. I'd Imagine the pictures and Norm Abrams' video don't quite do it justice and would like see it in person...

While never having looked into it more then asking my Dad what his Grandfathers name was (not Henry), being a "Studley" from Massachusetts(originally), I like to tell myself there is some relation there, my family has been in the area long enough for it to work.

Matthew N. Masail
12-14-2011, 12:09 PM
That is very cooll (-: lol I like the feel it seems to give

Neil Brooks
12-14-2011, 12:17 PM
Have you seen his tool box ??

LINK (http://www.phoenixmasonry.org/masonicmuseum/tool_chest_made_by_studley.htm)

http://www.phoenixmasonry.org/masonicmuseum/images/studley_tool_chest_open.jpg

Safe to say ... the man had mad skills.

Van Huskey
12-14-2011, 1:12 PM
Neil, I was just going to say although the bench is awesome I want his toolchest!

Neil Brooks
12-14-2011, 1:21 PM
Amen, Van. Apparently, a book about the man and his works ("Virtuoso") is in the making. In preparing for that book, they pulled the tools out, to examine the chest.

http://lostartpress.files.wordpress.com/2011/10/empty_studley_img_0280.jpg

Van Huskey
12-14-2011, 3:33 PM
Thanks Neil, that is a picture I had not seen. When I look at the chest I see a kindred spirit (but certainly not kindred hands!), I am the kind of person that could spend my life building and refining a shop instead of making anything actually useful, that is if I had the time. He obviously had a deep respect and love for his tools.

David Posey
12-14-2011, 6:40 PM
It's in a private collection. I believe the owner did not want to be identified at this time. The post where Chris talks about it is here:
http://lostartpress.wordpress.com/2011/10/04/obsessed-with-h-o-studley/

Andrew Joiner
12-14-2011, 7:00 PM
Have you seen his tool box ??

Safe to say ... the man had mad skills.

When I posted his workbench I just assumed everyone here would have seen the tool box by now. Yes, it and the bench are both inspiring.

Van Huskey
12-14-2011, 8:23 PM
Does he not have the PERFECT surname to be associated with that bench, particularly the vise. The Studly (sic) Vise: when that puny vise just isn't up to the task get yourself a real mans vise, a Studly vice!

Chris Studley
12-15-2011, 11:32 AM
@ Van: The surname has been fun to grow up with. I'd really like to get a hold of the author and find out what, if any, research he has done regarding H.O.'s decendents. I'm from the same general area and would love to be able to claim that I am his Great-Great-Grand something or cousin #times removed. I'd of course be happy to then provide a quote to the author regarding how woodworking still is a Studley Passion.

george wilson
10-29-2013, 7:00 AM
I wish the lighting in the Abrams video was better. But,at least I was made aware of the tool holders that lifted up to reveal more tools beneath. Studley must have spent several years of ACTIVE spare time building that chest. Even if someone could or would duplicate it (I just don't have the energy any more! Besides,I don't like copying things that much. I was paid to do it for years.),it would be very difficult to find the same tools to put into it, The #1 Stanley plane would be over $1200.00,for example.(I had one for MANY,MANY years,with the decal still on the handle).