Glenn Crocker
02-20-2005, 11:56 PM
Hello there-
I've visited this site for a while and like the exchange here, so I'm joining in. Here goes-
I acquired a Stanley 40-1/2 at an auction as part of a lot of 6 planes for $30.
I've researched it both in John Walter's 1990 edition and on the web, and still am not sure about date, type, etc. Given the following description, (no pics yet) what do I likely have?
Sweetheart logo on iron
backside of iron is stamped with a "+" about an inch from the edge (test for hardness?)
"B" cast in the body where the frog would normally be (I'm not sure what you call that area if there is no frog)
Beech tote and knob
no evidence of japaning on the outside of the body (one website said Stanley japaned the entire body except the sole)
1-1/2" wide cap iron works well but has been broken and welded (not brazed - it's rusty) and the weld barely shows through the face of the cap iron
no cross or tee ribbing under the frog(less) area unlike the description of a #40 I found on another website - Walter's book indicated that the 40-1/2 was the same as a 40 except in size.
Thanks in advance,
Glenn
I've visited this site for a while and like the exchange here, so I'm joining in. Here goes-
I acquired a Stanley 40-1/2 at an auction as part of a lot of 6 planes for $30.
I've researched it both in John Walter's 1990 edition and on the web, and still am not sure about date, type, etc. Given the following description, (no pics yet) what do I likely have?
Sweetheart logo on iron
backside of iron is stamped with a "+" about an inch from the edge (test for hardness?)
"B" cast in the body where the frog would normally be (I'm not sure what you call that area if there is no frog)
Beech tote and knob
no evidence of japaning on the outside of the body (one website said Stanley japaned the entire body except the sole)
1-1/2" wide cap iron works well but has been broken and welded (not brazed - it's rusty) and the weld barely shows through the face of the cap iron
no cross or tee ribbing under the frog(less) area unlike the description of a #40 I found on another website - Walter's book indicated that the 40-1/2 was the same as a 40 except in size.
Thanks in advance,
Glenn