Kim Ford
11-29-2010, 1:30 PM
We had thanksgiving dinner with some good friends who recently completed their new home. The original home and barn burned in a fire last year and they lost everything. But a year of hard work and a good insurance policy and insurance company have put them back to normal. After dinner my host said he had some of the beams from the barn that burnt down that he was cutting up for fire wood because they were badly burned, and asked if maybe I could find a piece to turn a bowl out of. The Wisconsin dairy farm was originally his uncles and he wanted a keepsake of sort because the house and barn were originally built by the family about 1875.
So out to the barn yard we went. He had started cutting up beams and there was a pile of two foot lengths. All of the beams were originally hand cut, about 12” square and we found one with minimal cracks that was a floor joist, flat on two sides. The wood looked like elm but that was just a guess.
I took it home and cleaned it up with the band saw to see what I had and split it down the heart to get two nice slabs about 11” X 3”. Then I looked at it very close and discovered it was either chestnut or beech, not elm and was very tight grain. So we counted the rings. In what must have been a 12” +/- log, the 6” radius we counted had a minimum of 150 growth rings, almost 30 per inch. If a tree gets one growth ring per year that means this tree started its young life around 1725 AD. Don’t know how it will turn, that is tonight but it was just a little humbling to think about the age of this piece.
Oh and by the way, I think it is dry. I shouldn't have to DNA, boil or bag it to get the moisture out. :)
I will post pictures when it is complete.
So out to the barn yard we went. He had started cutting up beams and there was a pile of two foot lengths. All of the beams were originally hand cut, about 12” square and we found one with minimal cracks that was a floor joist, flat on two sides. The wood looked like elm but that was just a guess.
I took it home and cleaned it up with the band saw to see what I had and split it down the heart to get two nice slabs about 11” X 3”. Then I looked at it very close and discovered it was either chestnut or beech, not elm and was very tight grain. So we counted the rings. In what must have been a 12” +/- log, the 6” radius we counted had a minimum of 150 growth rings, almost 30 per inch. If a tree gets one growth ring per year that means this tree started its young life around 1725 AD. Don’t know how it will turn, that is tonight but it was just a little humbling to think about the age of this piece.
Oh and by the way, I think it is dry. I shouldn't have to DNA, boil or bag it to get the moisture out. :)
I will post pictures when it is complete.