PDA

View Full Version : Fettle to the Metal With LA Blocks



Jim Koepke
10-28-2009, 12:41 AM
Low Angle Block Planes of the 060 Size

The three planes shown are all of the Stanley #60 or #60-1/2 design. The real difference between the two is the #60-1/2 has a Japanned or painted lever cap and the #60 has a nickel plated lever cap. Of course, this all changed around 1950. First is a kind of burgundy color. The second is one bought from a hardware store, if my memory is working, in the 1980s. It is made in England. The third is made in USA and was acquired recently at a yard sale for $1. I think that is on the high side for the quality as bought. The planes are kept in this order throughout this writing. They will be referred to as the maroon, the English and the $1 special.

These planes do seem to function OK, but not as well as either my #65 or #65-1/2. I am sure the modern block planes offered by our favorite makers in the U.S. and Canada perform much better than what is shown here.

Patrick Leach says to avoid the maroon colored block planes. I am not sure if he just doesn't like the color or if he feels they are of poor quality. The maroon plane is usually my favorite of this trio. If he does not like them for quality, then an earlier plane of this model should be a really great tool. Maybe one of these days one will come my way, then I can decide. If it has more area for the blade bedding that would explain a lot. Anyone with an older example of these models is asked to post pictures.

131191

The #65 and #65-1/2 are being shown for comparison. There are a few items of interest. Notice the bedding area near the mouth. There is a lot more blade support on the #65 models. Because of the thinness around the mouth area, one should look closely for cracks at the edges of the mouth. Using the plane to take heavy shavings or over tightening the cap can cause fatigue and stress cracks to ruin an otherwise fine plane.

131188131185

The $1 special is compared to a #65 in the photo to again point out the bedding area. Also of note is the finish between the two planes. Also notice the tongue for the mouth adjuster on the $1 special hangs over the side. This gets in the way when trying to use this plane on a shooting board with the mouth closed. Also, the mouth will not close as far as on the other block planes. The sole on the $1 special also had a concave banana shaped sole to the tune of about .005" causing more problems.

Also notice the blades. The 65 models are years apart yet still use the same blades. In fact, that is a fairly common blade from Stanley. It is used on a lot of block planes including the 9-1/2, 18 and 220. The maroon plane has what looks to be an older style blade. The English plane has a blade to allow for a lateral adjuster which has been removed since it does not seem to be more than just another shiny piece of metal to add weight. The $1 special has a blade with little holes in it. They tend to restrict the ability to make much lateral adjustment. More on this in a bit.
There have also been changes to the mouth adjustment components. The plates are different, even the screw threads are different.

131192

A piece of pine was clamped up and the planes were used to take as thin a shaving as possible. The maroon and English plane are pretty much how they came to me. The $1 special at this stage is also pretty much as found. All the blades were sharp for this test.

131187

Notice the blade extension of the three planes. The $1 special has almost no lip at the back of the mouth. Also of note with the $1 special is the blade would not cut on the right side. Using feeler gauges, it was determined that the right side of the bed was a bit thicker than the left side. Before fettling the plane, it was not possible to get a decent shaving the full width of the blade.

The bed near the mouth was not only angled from side to side, there was a little residual casting on one side that limited the blade's lateral movement. An auger file was used to correct the bedding and the mouth. This type of file only has teeth on two opposing sides of the four sides. Filing in this area has to be done with great care and attention. No rocking of the file is allowed! Only a few thousands of an inch of metal are being removed and it comes off fast. Even with this file which is an old one and fairly dull.

131184

Not done at this time was to file open the slot for the mouth plate screw to get a bit more adjustment on the mouth opening. I am also considering bending the tongue on the adjustment harp up so it does not hang over the side when the mouth is closed for shooting board use. The geometries look like it will have to be bent up. If it were bent down, its movement could be blocked by the side of the plane.

The sole was lapped and now for the final tests & results.

This plane actually does pretty good after a tune up. It won't ever surpass my other LA block planes in operation, but it is passible. The blade not extending out of the mouth very much before cutting may have a little advantage on end grain. This is where the LA block planes excel.

131190

On straight grain after being fettled, a shaving can be taken across the whole width of the blade. The finest shaving this plane seems to be able to accomplish is about .0015". Notice how little the blade is extended for the cut.

131189

If you have an older #60 or #60-1/2 I am sure others would appreciate your taking pictures of their blade bedding area, especially if it is different than what is shown in these three later day planes. Alternately, if you have an LV or LN equivalent of these planes if you could post a picture to satisfy my curiosity, there are surely others who would also like to see what the current planes offer in the blade bedding area.

This will have its link added to my fettling thread in Neanderthal wisdonm/FAQs.

Making shavings,

jim

Dave Matson
10-28-2009, 4:09 AM
This little guy is probably nearly the same vintage as your #65 as it has the larger machined bed. It was given to me by a very good friend. The cam lock was missing but a replacement from stanleytoolparts.com rectified the situation. The sliding mouth has a good range of travel and can really close the mouth up tight. It sure would be neat to see a type study for block planes.

John Keeton
10-28-2009, 8:03 AM
Another great thread! Jim, you are a valuable resource.

jerry nazard
10-28-2009, 11:45 AM
Jim,

Read your post first thing this morning and just came back for a second reading. Great stuff and invaluable resource material. I have a bunch of flea market blocks that need work someday, so your post is quite useful to me. On an aside, I recently converted a junker Stanley Handyman into a rabbit block. It's holding it's shape and trimming tenons nicely. I love to save $$$!!!

Thanks for the post!

-Jerry

Jim Koepke
10-28-2009, 12:51 PM
David,

Thanks for the images. That addresses my curiosity and it looks like the earlier block planes did offer better support of the blade. There are type studies of block planes in the John Walter book, but they only cover the #9-1/2 and the #18/#19 series. Some of the information seems to be applicable to the low angle block planes, but then some things are just different. From looking at the formed metal adjuster mechanism, the adjuster knob and the turned up mouth adjuster, I would guess your plane is no later than post war 1940s or the early 1950s. It is also possible that it was made before WW II. I just do not know enough about block plane variations to put an exact date on them.

John,

Thanks for your kind words.

Jerry,

What did you do for a blade for your conversion?


jim

jerry nazard
10-28-2009, 1:55 PM
David,


Jerry,

What did you do for a blade for your conversion?


jim

Jim,

I ground ~3/16 off the left side of the existing blade starting 1/4" behind the bevel. Quick and dirty!

-Jerry

James Scheffler
10-28-2009, 3:39 PM
Jim,

Read your post first thing this morning and just came back for a second reading. Great stuff and invaluable resource material. I have a bunch of flea market blocks that need work someday, so your post is quite useful to me. On an aside, I recently converted a junker Stanley Handyman into a rabbit block. It's holding it's shape and trimming tenons nicely. I love to save $$$!!!

Thanks for the post!

-Jerry

I would love to see some pictures of that!

Jim

Jim Koepke
10-28-2009, 4:17 PM
I would love to see some pictures of that!

Here is a recent thread on such.

http://www.sawmillcreek.org/showthread.php?p=1227011#poststop

jim

jerry nazard
10-28-2009, 6:59 PM
I would love to see some pictures of that!

Jim

Here is a picture, but a bit fuzzy. (???) Might be time for a camera upgrade or some instructions in how to use one. :o Jim K. has already posted a link to the recent wabbit thread.

-Jerry

Jay Maiers
04-11-2011, 4:13 PM
Sorry for ressurecting

Using feeler gauges, it was determined that the right side of the bed was a bit thicker than the left side. Before fettling the plane, it was not possible to get a decent shaving the full width of the blade.

Jim,
Can you expand on this process? I've got a Craftsman LA block (similar to a #65) and I think the bed is uneven. When the blade is parallel to the rear of the mouth, one side will take a shaving and the other side will not. I believe I have squared and sharpened the blade properly, so I don't know what else it could be. Then again, I'm new to planes and may be missing something.
Thanks!

Jim Koepke
04-11-2011, 6:03 PM
Sorry for ressurecting
Jim,
Can you expand on this process? I've got a Craftsman LA block (similar to a #65) and I think the bed is uneven. When the blade is parallel to the rear of the mouth, one side will take a shaving and the other side will not. I believe I have squared and sharpened the blade properly, so I don't know what else it could be. Then again, I'm new to planes and may be missing something.
Thanks!

No problem about the resurrection. That is how questions get answered and new material is added.

If your blade is properly sharpened and the back is flat, then it could be that the mouth bedding is the problem.

A very small portion of out of flat on the underside of a bevel up plane can also cause such a problem. For a little on this see:

http://www.sawmillcreek.org/showthread.php?158373-My-Camber-Blade-Round-Tuit-Finally-Came

If the feeler gauge check does not reveal a difference between the sides of the mouth/bedding, it could be at the frog. Without the cap in place, hold the blade in place aim the plane at a light source and look under the blade for slivers of light. Do this again with the cap in place, only this time look for light between the cap and blade. Another easy check for this is with pieces of paper under the blade or cap on the side you think may have a gap. With the cap tightened, if the paper pulls out, there is a problem. It can also happen that the high side is doing the cutting and the unsupported side is floating and not getting in on the action. If this is the case, the high side still needs to be worked down.

To check with a feeler gauge, the mouth adjustment plate needs to be removed. It will be easier if you can remove the gauges from the pack or have the pack off the edge of your work surface. In the picture the majority of the gauges are being lightly held by my bench vise. The lip on the plane's mouth is .016" all the way across.

191204

Some gauge sets may not have all the sizes. In that case you may need to stack a couple of gauges or make a judgement call. Once it is set up as shown, you can drag the tip of a finger nail on the gauge to the edge of the mouth. When the gage and the edge are the same, you should not feel the transition in either direction. Set this up with the blade on one side of the mouth and then the other. It also doesn't hurt to check it at a few points along the way. Make sure the edge of the plane is not resting on the gauge. The thickness of this step (lip) should be the same all across the mouth.

If there is a difference, carefully remove a little metal from the area that is thicker. The metal comes off real fast. An auger file works well for this.

Hope this helps,

jtk

Jay Maiers
04-11-2011, 9:27 PM
Hope this helps,
jtk

Perfect. Hopefully I'll have a chance to work with it this week. I thought I did a decent job with flattening the blade, but I'll check that again just to make sure.
Thanks!
Jay

Johnny Kleso
04-11-2011, 10:19 PM
Hey Jim,
Very nice tutorial..

The only part I am unsure about is filing the the bed..
I like to use a razor or new screwdriver to scrape paint after refinishing so not to alter the bed..
I guess it is was just a casting flashing it is OK

I due like to file the back of the mouth's V blunt so it cant catch a knot and cause it to chip out..

Jim Koepke
04-12-2011, 1:59 AM
The only part I am unsure about is filing the the bed..

I guess the other option is trying to build up the low side if you have a bed that is sloping to one side.

A couple of my later planes have had a problem like Jay describes. There are a few causes. In my case it was caused by a bed that "leaned" to one side.


I like to use a razor or new screwdriver to scrape paint after refinishing so not to alter the bed..

I like to mask off the areas that don't get painted. What ever works best for the one doing the work, I guess.

jtk

Ron Petley
04-12-2011, 8:31 AM
Great info, here is what I have, Lee Vally Block plane, it is the newer looking black one, A record 60 1/2 1980's vintage the blue one , a older Miller falls with the cracked wood knob, no adjustable mouth, and a Stanly #18 type 9 1907 vintage.
Most surprising is the bed of the Record, does not look like the blade would fit well on the small painted bed.
Cheers Ron. 191254191255191256191257

Jim Koepke
04-12-2011, 11:53 AM
Ron,

That is an interesting pictorial displaying the evolution of block planes.

It is interesting that the 1907 and the Lee Valley have the same feature of a large bedding area.

I think the Record shows the "winner" in what is often called the race to the bottom. I wonder if the area was even machined under the paint. During this period of plane making, it is my opinion the manufacturers were not making tools for the professional wood workers but instead for the home market that wanted to take a few shavings off of a door that was sticking or the bottom of a leg on a wobbly piece of furniture. The buyer would wander into a hardware store and buy the cheapest tool they could find for the one time use. The user was not worried about a glass like surface or sub-thou shavings.

It would not surprise me though that the Record could make great shavings. Like they say, sometimes without any intent, the moon and stars all align to make something happen with a happy result.

We are fortunate that a few people saw a market in high quality woodworking tools and started making tools like Lee Valley's Veritas line or Lie-Nielsen's line of fine tools. Others in the tool making field who had been making fine tools have become better known to many seeking a better mousetrap.

Just imagine if you were in the 1970s looking for quality tools. A person would have to scour all kinds of yard sales and do a completely different kind of search than we are blessed with today. In the 1970s, there wasn't an internet with ebay and Craig's List. How would we find people like Brass City, Rose Tools, Patrick Leach?

We may have been able to find a used tool dealer in the Popular Mechanics or other magazines of the day. For some of us, these may be the good old days.

jtk

Ron Petley
04-13-2011, 12:42 AM
Jim:
Your comments ring truer than some may think.
I bought that record back in the early 80"s as in 1900 + 80, I was starting out as a full time furniture maker and that was my block plane. I wore the paint off of it planing many miles of oak.
Not until I became interested in this form did I become interested in planes as planes and not just another tool. This resulted in me buying a half dozen Stanley block planes and fetteling them for fun, and giving most of them away to friends. I treated myself to the Lee Vally, but it was a toy like the Stanley's and I would still use the record to make a piece of furniture.
I was shocked to see the bed of the record as I never really examined it I would sharpen the blade and use it. I had flattened the sole when I bought it and that was about it.
I have been using the Lee Vally some and just now finding it a better tool than the record.
It is ironic I used the "winner" when I was woodworking daily and using that plane daily, it does make thin shavings but it might be from familiarity. Now with a quality plane I go to my shop and make a few unhurried Saturday afternoon shavings. Cheers Ron.